TB --- 2012-06-07 05:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-07 05:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 21:59:49 O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 06/06/12 16:15, Chris Rees wrote:
> > On 6 June 2012 14:48, Erich Dollansky
> > wrote:
> Those "minor" issues are, having the recent mess in front of my eyes, a
> simple "negative exaggeration". What is that "price worth", if the
> system is
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Mark Linimon wrote:
It's not particularly easy to see this on cvsweb. But let's take a look
at a random Mk/bsd.*.mk file via 'cvs log':
RCS file: /home/FreeBSD/pcvs/ports/Mk/bsd.apache.mk,v
Working file: bsd.apache.mk
head: 1.36
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
sy
On 06/06/12 16:15, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 6 June 2012 14:48, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 06 June 2012 9:21:22 Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
>>>
>>> Overall I see it as packages are flat stable at the cost of being out of
>>> date, and ports are current but not guaranteed to compile without
>>>
On 2012-06-06 18:51, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> Worked a treat, now it barfs on libelf
...
> /usr/src/lib/libelf/elf_scn.c:198:41: error: equality comparison with
> extraneous parentheses [-Werror,-Wparentheses-equality]
> if (((&e->e_u.e_elf.e_scn)->stqh_first == ((void *)0))) {
> ~
On 6 June 2012 11:49, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> This is because clang suppresses a number of warnings for specific
> patterns in macros. Since ccache passes clang the preprocessed file,
> those suppressions will not work, and some additional warnings can be
> triggered.
>
> See also the following t
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 15:15:24 Chris Rees wrote:
> On 6 June 2012 14:48, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 06 June 2012 9:21:22 Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> >>
> >> Overall I see it as packages are flat stable at the cost of being out of
> >> date, and ports are current but not guaranteed to com
> In parallel is the discussion why so little people are using FreeBSD.
>
> Do you understand what I want to say?
>
> Erich
I would say there are 3 main things.
1) the 3rd party apps, which has already been covered of how overpowering it
can appear to newbies. Not going into depth anymore
2)
On 6 June 2012 14:12, Erich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06 June 2012 8:48:10 Chris Rees wrote:
>> On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, "Erich" wrote:
>> >
>
>> No it doesn't. It states clearly that you shouldn't use tags unless you
>> know what you are doing, as several of us have explained more than once.
>>
> is my
On 6 June 2012 14:48, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06 June 2012 9:21:22 Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
>>
>> Overall I see it as packages are flat stable at the cost of being out of
>> date, and ports are current but not guaranteed to compile without
>> intervention. The Maintainers do give a very g
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 9:21:22 Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
>
> Overall I see it as packages are flat stable at the cost of being out of
> date, and ports are current but not guaranteed to compile without
> intervention. The Maintainers do give a very good shot to make them stable
> but sometimes one perso
TB --- 2012-06-06 11:40:01 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 11:40:01 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Kalchev
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 2:46 AM
> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?
>
>
>
> On 06.06.12 05:31, Er
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 8:48:10 Chris Rees wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, "Erich" wrote:
> >
> No it doesn't. It states clearly that you shouldn't use tags unless you
> know what you are doing, as several of us have explained more than once.
>
is my English really this bad?
>From the handbook:
Hi,
let me rite the answer on top before my mouse scrolling down.
I am fully aware of what you are writing. I am saying this from the point of
view people have when they start with FreeBSD.
This little help would make them feel much much saver.
I know that it would not change much in real life
On 06/06/12 10:41, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * "O. Hartmann" [2012-06-03 22:55 +0200]:
>> ... I spent now two complete days watching my boxes updating their
>> ports. Several ports do not compile anymore (inkscape, libreoffice,
>> libxul, to name some of the very hurting ones!).
>
> Do you have
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:50:02 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:50:02 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On 2012-06-06 00:07, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> Buildworld completes successfully with ccache switched off, it fails
> otherwise, system was built WITH_CLANG_IS_CC previously.
...
> In file included from /usr/src/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.c:1:
> /usr/src/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.c:467:15: error: ex
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:16:24 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:16:24 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:56:07 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:56:07 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-06-06 07:05:57 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 07:05:57 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, "Erich" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 05 June 2012 7:13:47 Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:23:01PM +0700, Erich wrote:
> > > But is this true for apache only or for the whole ports tree?
> >
> > Entire tree.
>
> my problem with this is that the documentation stat
On 06.06.12 05:35, Erich wrote:
Warning: Be very careful to specify any tag= fields correctly. Some tags are
valid only for certain collections of files. If you specify an incorrect or
misspelled tag, CVSup will delete files which you probably do not want deleted.
In particular, use only tag
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
27 matches
Mail list logo
