On 7/22/12 9:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jul 22, 2012, at 9:12 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:22:33 -0600
Scott Long sco...@samsco.org wrote:
On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Is anyone looking at PCIe hotplug support?
I'm especially interested if
Hello.
I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that pkg2ng is involving
the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be
the tool completely dependend on system's toolsets, isn't it?
I know that
On 23 Jul 2012 09:44, Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Hello.
I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that pkg2ng is involving
the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be
On 07/23/12 11:07, Chris Rees wrote:
On 23 Jul 2012 09:44, Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Hello.
I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that pkg2ng is involving
the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
also for usage with
On 23/07/2012 09:43, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Hello.
I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that pkg2ng is involving
the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be
the tool completely dependend
On 23/07/2012 09:43, Hartmann, O. wrote:
I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that pkg2ng is involving
the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be
the tool completely dependend on
On 23/07/2012 10:31, Hartmann, O. wrote:
portmaster now is not recognizing anymore the format of the /var/db/pkg
folder - for those considered the knowledged no surprise, for me simply
the indication that portmaster usage isn't usable as usual.
You need to patch portmaster separately from
On Jul 23, 2012, at 1:45 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 7/22/12 9:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jul 22, 2012, at 9:12 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:22:33 -0600
Scott Long sco...@samsco.org wrote:
On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Is anyone looking
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 09:01:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
[Why don't you bother to configure your mail client properly ?
Answering to email with 500+ long lines is not trivial]
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 06:18:12PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 21 Jul 2012, at 22:16, Konstantin
On 23 Jul 2012, at 20:18, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Longer description is that pc_curthread is offset 0 if %gs-based.
The dereferenced pointer point to the struct thread, which contains
td_proc pointer at offset 8. Instead, clang seems to dereference
td_proc from offset 8 based on %gs, or
10 matches
Mail list logo