[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2012-09-27 04:40:22 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-27 04:40:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: [PATCH] unbreak imake build when clang set as base compiler

On 9/27/12, Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 9/26/12, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Oliver Pinter >> wrote: >>> On 9/26/12, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote: > Hi all! > > This patch fixed the problem, when bu

Re: [PATCH] unbreak imake build when clang set as base compiler

On 9/26/12, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Oliver Pinter > wrote: >> On 9/26/12, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Oliver Pinter >>> wrote: Hi all! This patch fixed the problem, when buildig imake on a machine where clang is

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2012-09-26 16:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-09-26 16:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: [PATCH] unbreak imake build when clang set as base compiler

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 9/26/12, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Oliver Pinter >> wrote: >>> Hi all! >>> >>> This patch fixed the problem, when buildig imake on a machine where >>> clang is the base the compiler (WITH_CLANG_IS_CC). >>

Re: [PATCH] unbreak imake build when clang set as base compiler

On 9/26/12, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Oliver Pinter > wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> This patch fixed the problem, when buildig imake on a machine where >> clang is the base the compiler (WITH_CLANG_IS_CC). > > (Picking a random message to reply to) Why not create PRs and

Re: r240825 -current fault with backtrace

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > Gleb Smirnoff wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:13:58PM -0400, Kim Culhan wrote: >> K> serial terminal not available, backtrace is a screen pic: >> Why didn't you make dump? >> >> db> call doadump > > I reliably get this panic on my route

Re: r240825 -current fault with backtrace

Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:13:58PM -0400, Kim Culhan wrote: > K> serial terminal not available, backtrace is a screen pic: > Why didn't you make dump? > > db> call doadump I reliably get this panic on my routers when I reboot the carp backup. Shortly after the syncdev: igb

[PATCH] Add locking to dpt(4)

I have patches to add locking to dpt(4) and make it MPSAFE (along with some other fixes). I would appreciate any testing folks are able to do. The patches are against HEAD but should apply to 8 or 9. Please ensure you have INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT enabled for any initial testing that

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

schrieb Harald Schmalzbauer am 25.09.2012 20:24 (localtime): > schrieb Attilio Rao am 21.09.2012 02:22 (localtime): >> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao : > 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao : >> As

Re: zpool can't bring online disk2 ----I screwed up

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:50:28PM -0700, Jose A. Lombera wrote: > This is the error I got when I run the failover script. > > > > Sep 24 06:43:39 san1 hastd[3404]: [disk3] (primary) Provider /dev/mfid3 is > not part of resource disk3. > > Sep 24 06:43:39 san1 hastd[3343]: [disk3] (primary)