I've tried to update hwpmc by adding support for xeon class of Ivy
bridge processors.
Thanks Jim for pointing me to the correct document. (325462-045US Jan 2013)
I do not have a reference machine to test with. Any help in that
regard would be appreciated.
Here are the diffs against head (245927)
I.
It seems that linker_preload checks a module for being a duplicate module only
if the module has MDT_VERSION.
This is probably designed to allow different version of the same module to
co-exist (for some definition of co-exist)?
But, OTOH, this doesn't work well if the module is version-less
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:58 AM, hiren panchasara
wrote:
> I've tried to update hwpmc by adding support for xeon class of Ivy
> bridge processors.
>
> Thanks Jim for pointing me to the correct document. (325462-045US Jan 2013)
>
> I do not have a reference machine to test with. Any help in that
>
on 25/01/2013 18:08 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 25/01/2013 15:51 John Baldwin said the following:
>> On Friday, January 25, 2013 3:43:33 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
>>> If you have ACPI suspend/resume working, if it used to work but stopped
>>> working
>>> at some time, if it never worked
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:19:44PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2013-01-25 04:26:02 -0500, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:18:48PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek
> > wrote:
> >> One is when I leave laptop idle for some tim
Keeping sbruno in the chain.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:58 AM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
>> I've tried to update hwpmc by adding support for xeon class of Ivy
>> bridge processors.
>>
>> Thanks Jim for pointing me to the correct document.
Can people that use PPP please review the following FAQs
What do we care about?
Is it factually correct?
Does it use deprecated functionality?
Is it completely outdated to the point we should remove it?
Does it need better examples?
Is it clear and concise?
Does it have typos or spelling mi