Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!

2013-02-28 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Freebsd-fs. My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS. It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck says Unexpected SU+J inconsistency (Inode mode/directory tyme mismatch) and requested full check (which will take more than hour on such FS). All drives

Re: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!

2013-02-28 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Lev. You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 12:06:30: LS Hello, Freebsd-fs. LS My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS. LS It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck LS says Unexpected SU+J inconsistency (Inode mode/directory tyme LS mismatch) and requested

Re: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!

2013-02-28 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
How about tell us 9.1-STABLE from which date you run? Do you use any dumps/snapshots in this FS? In past, that could broke things. -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!

2013-02-28 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Alexander. You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 13:07:35: AY How about tell us 9.1-STABLE from which date you run? r244957 AY Do you use any dumps/snapshots in this FS? Nope. -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org ___

Re: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!

2013-02-28 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Lev. You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 12:33:25: LS My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS. LS It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck LS says Unexpected SU+J inconsistency (Inode mode/directory tyme LS mismatch) and requested full check (which will

Re: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!

2013-02-28 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
2013/2/28 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org Hello, Lev. You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 12:33:25: LS My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS. LS It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck LS says Unexpected SU+J inconsistency (Inode mode/directory tyme

Re: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!

2013-02-28 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Alexander. You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 14:22:59: AY Could you afford reproducing this? :) After half a day of memtest86+ :) I want to be sure, that it is not memory problem first. AY Also, would be nice to know how look your setup (CPUs, how much disks, how AY they connected, is it

Re: Response of *.freebsd.org websites are very slow

2013-02-28 Thread Fbsd8
Peter Wemm wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Niclas Zeising zeis...@daemonic.sewrote: On 2013-02-27 20:25, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: I have installed snapshot

Panic in ffs_valloc (Was: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!)

2013-02-28 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Lev. You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 14:13:23: LS My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS. LS It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck LS says Unexpected SU+J inconsistency (Inode mode/directory tyme LS mismatch) and requested full check (which will

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-02-28 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-28 13:09:36 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-28 13:09:37 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!

2013-02-28 Thread Ivan Voras
On 28/02/2013 11:31, Lev Serebryakov wrote: WD disks are in software RAID5 with geom_raid5 (from ports, but I'm active maintainer of it). Disks are in Default configuration: WC and NCQ are enabled. I know, that FS guys could blame geom_raid5, as it could delay real write up to 15

Re: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!

2013-02-28 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Ivan. You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 18:19:38: Maybe, it is subtile interference between raid5 implementation and SU+J, but in such case I want to understand what does raid5 do wrong. IV You guessed correctly, I was going to blame geom_raid5 :) It is not first time :( But

Re: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!

2013-02-28 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Ivan. You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 18:56:47: LS There was commit r246876, but I don't understand exactly what it LS means, as no real FS or driver's code was touched. And, yes, barriers are much stronger than sync writes, as they should flush all previous writes, even that is

Re: Response of *.freebsd.org websites are very slow

2013-02-28 Thread Peter Wemm
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: [..] From cleveland ohio and www.freebsd.org is un-reachable again. It comes and gos. To me it's acting like someone high up is making dns changes. Some freebsd official better contact yahoo and put a stop to what ever there

Re: Fixing X220 Video The Right Way

2013-02-28 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:15:46 am matt wrote: On 02/27/13 12:27, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:35:43 pm matt wrote: On 02/27/13 09:00, John Baldwin wrote: If that is true, it's because your BIOS is lying. Do you have a URL to your ASL lying around already?

Re: Panic in ffs_valloc (Was: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!)

2013-02-28 Thread Don Lewis
On 28 Feb, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Lev. You wrote 28 февраля 2013 г., 14:13:23: LS My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS. LS It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck LS says Unexpected SU+J inconsistency (Inode mode/directory tyme LS

Re: Panic in ffs_valloc (Was: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS!)

2013-02-28 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Don. You wrote 1 марта 2013 г., 9:11:32: DL The fact that the filesystem code called panic() indicates that the DL filesystem was already corrupt by that point. That's a likely reason DL for fsck complaining about the unexpected SU+J inconsistency. DL Incorrect write ordering that