[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-09 07:41:53 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-09 07:41:53 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

panic during transition to multi-user mode @r249303 [i386]

2013-04-09 Thread David Wolfskill
I saw this first on my laptop; backtrace mentioned something about iwn(4), so after I saved the crash dump, I flippe dthe wireless switch off and tried again... and got a different (but undoubtedly related) panic, which I also saved. Then, after my build machine finished, that also got a panic (us

Re: panic during transition to multi-user mode @r249303 [i386]

2013-04-09 Thread Manfred Antar
At 09:21 AM 4/9/2013, David Wolfskill wrote: >I saw this first on my laptop; backtrace mentioned something about >iwn(4), so after I saved the crash dump, I flippe dthe wireless switch >off and tried again... and got a different (but undoubtedly related) >panic, which I also saved. > >Then, after m

Re: panic during transition to multi-user mode @r249303 [i386]

2013-04-09 Thread Manfred Antar
More info Break to debugger starts here: add net default: gateway 192.168.0.1 add net :::0.0.0.0: gateway ::1 add net ::0.0.0.0: gateway ::1 add net fe80::: gateway ::1 add net ff02::: gateway ::1 Waiting for bge0 to have link. Waiting for 192.168.0.1 to respond to ICMP Fatal trap 12: page

Re: panic during transition to multi-user mode @r249303 [i386]

2013-04-09 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:26:53AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote: > > > More info > Break to debugger starts here: > > add net default: gateway 192.168.0.1 > add net :::0.0.0.0: gateway ::1 > add net ::0.0.0.0: gateway ::1 > add net fe80::: gateway ::1 > add net ff02::: gateway ::1 > Waiting fo

Re: panic during transition to multi-user mode @r249303 [i386]

2013-04-09 Thread Manfred Antar
At 10:59 AM 4/9/2013, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >This is hopefully fixed by r249314. > Yes r249314 works fine Thanks || n...@pozo.com || || || -- This message has been scanned for viruses

Re: panic during transition to multi-user mode @r249303 [i386]

2013-04-09 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:59:39PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > ... > This is hopefully fixed by r249314. After hand-applying that change, re-building & re-installing the kernel on my build machine, it is able to make the transition to multi-user mode without issue. Now running: FreeBSD f

Re: Intel D2500CC motherboard and strange RS232/UART behavior

2013-04-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday, April 07, 2013 5:46:34 pm Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 7 April 2013 13:15, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <1428566376.20130407234...@serebryakov.spb.ru>, Lev Serebryakov writ > > es: > > > >>It doesn't look so. And uart1 and uart3 doesn't have interrupt > >>according to `v

Re: Intel D2500CC motherboard and strange RS232/UART behavior

2013-04-09 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, John. You wrote 10 апреля 2013 г., 0:08:09: >> .. did we really break shared interrupt handling on ISA? JB> When did it ever work? sio has special hacks to make it work, and in my experience, it worked around FreeBSD 4 (or even 3? I've started with 2.2.2, but it was later), when I had

Re: Intel D2500CC motherboard and strange RS232/UART behavior

2013-04-09 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, John. You wrote 10 апреля 2013 г., 0:08:09: JB> When did it ever work? Problem is, that every uart device now is independent from each other in good "OOP" style, and it looks like interrupt sharing we need one interrupt handler per irq (not per device), which will now about several

Re: Intel D2500CC motherboard and strange RS232/UART behavior

2013-04-09 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <105818341.20130410004...@serebryakov.spb.ru>, Lev Serebryakov write s: >JB> When did it ever work? > Problem is, that every uart device now is independent from each > other in good "OOP" style, and it looks like interrupt sharing we > need one interrupt handler per irq (not per devi

Re: Intel D2500CC motherboard and strange RS232/UART behavior

2013-04-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 4:44:51 pm Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, John. > You wrote 10 апреля 2013 г., 0:08:09: > > JB> When did it ever work? > Problem is, that every uart device now is independent from each > other in good "OOP" style, and it looks like interrupt sharing we > need one

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-09 18:06:07 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-09 18:06:07 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on armv6/arm

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-09 21:20:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-09 21:20:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-09 21:20:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-09 21:20:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-09 21:20:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-09 21:20:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-09 21:20:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-09 21:20:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-10 00:20:03 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-10 00:20:03 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-10 00:52:33 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-10 00:52:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-10 00:12:21 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-10 00:12:21 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: Problems with axe(4) and checksum offloading

2013-04-09 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:45:58PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote: > Hi YongHyeon, > > output from verbose boot > > ugen3.2: at usbus3 > axe0: on usbus3 > axe0: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x10 > miibus1: on axe0 > ukphy0: PHY 16 on miibus1 > ukphy0: OUI 0x007063, model 0x0008, rev. 1 > ukphy0: none, 10baseT, 10bas

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-10 00:03:05 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-10 00:03:05 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-10 01:59:11 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-10 01:59:11 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-10 01:22:54 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-10 01:22:54 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-04-09 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-04-10 01:54:40 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-04-10 01:54:40 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: Intel D2500CC motherboard and strange RS232/UART behavior

2013-04-09 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, John. You wrote 10 апреля 2013 г., 0:58:22: >> Problem is, that every uart device now is independent from each >> other in good "OOP" style, and it looks like interrupt sharing we >> need one interrupt handler per irq (not per device), which will now >> about several UARTs. Somethin

Re: Intel D2500CC motherboard and strange RS232/UART behavior

2013-04-09 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Poul-Henning. You wrote 10 апреля 2013 г., 0:52:04: >> Problem is, that every uart device now is independent from each >> other in good "OOP" style, and it looks like interrupt sharing we >> need one interrupt handler per irq (not per device), which will now >> about several UARTs. Some