On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:22:54AM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:52:07PM +0200, Roger Pau Monn? wrote:
On 26/05/13 22:20, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
Instead of a pause() that may be too short or too long, how about
waiting for the necessary lock? In other words,
From: Alexander Fedorovalexander.fedo...@rtlservice.com
Date: 24 maja 2013 03:51:58 GMT-07:00
To: curr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NAND Framework ONFI chip detection
Hi, current!
I received a positive feedback from Grzegorz Bernacki (semihalf).
He said that my patch is ok. Can anyone
Hi,
when I try to build ports on -CURRENT, I've been seeing tons of these messages
since the past week or so:
make: /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk line 1633: warning: Couldn't read shell's
output for if /sbin/sysctl -n compat.ia32.maxvmem /dev/null 21; then echo
YES; fi
The amd64 kernel I'm
On 27/05/13 08:07, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:22:54AM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:52:07PM +0200, Roger Pau Monn? wrote:
On 26/05/13 22:20, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
Instead of a pause() that may be too short or too long, how about
waiting
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:19:51AM +0200, Roger Pau Monn? wrote:
On 27/05/13 08:07, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:22:54AM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:52:07PM +0200, Roger Pau Monn? wrote:
On 26/05/13 22:20, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On 27/05/13 12:23, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:19:51AM +0200, Roger Pau Monn? wrote:
On 27/05/13 08:07, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:22:54AM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:52:07PM +0200, Roger Pau Monn? wrote:
On
Hello Lev,
to be precise, I disabled serial ports 3 and 4 and
swapped ports 1 and 2 to the back panel in the
machine's BIOS.
Then I added a test to the ioapic_config_intr function
to detect the trig == INTR_TRIGGER_EDGE and
pol == INTR_POLARITY_LOW case and to rewrite it to
INTR_TRIGGER_EDGE
Thanks Eric, in case of HP Proliant DL120 G7 server, BIOS's configuration needs
to be OS Control Mode.
The similar would apply to other systems.
Cheers,
- Michio
On May 18, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 05/18/2013 10:09 AM, Michio Honda wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to experiment
Hi,
I heard a rumor that the 10.0 code freeze will be in the end of July.
Is that true?
Can anyone tell me when does it plan to be?
Regards,
Oded Shanoon
Ofed-FreeBSD team
Mellanox Technologies, Raanana
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On May 27, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Oded Shanoon wrote:
Hi,
I heard a rumor that the 10.0 code freeze will be in the end of July.
Is that true?
No.
The release engineering team will shift focus to 9.2-R after the current focus
of 8.4-R.
Can anyone tell me when does it plan to be?
10 will
There is no cc executable in the path (eg., there is no /usr/bin/cc) and the CC
make-variable is set to an absolute path to the C compiler (Clang) in
/etc/make.conf. Then, for example,
cd /usr/ports/www/seamonkey make config
results in the following output:
make: /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.qt.mk
On 05/27/2013 02:28, Super Bisquit wrote:
building shared library libc.so.7
/usr/bin/ld: warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in a shared object.
I have run into this issue multiple times in the past -- its occurrence seems to be
correlated with header updates. As an instant workaround, you can add
On May 27, 2013, at 19:21, d...@gmx.com wrote:
On 05/27/2013 02:28, Super Bisquit wrote:
building shared library libc.so.7
/usr/bin/ld: warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in a shared object.
I have run into this issue multiple times in the past -- its occurrence seems
to be correlated with
From observation:
volt% amttool-tng k5 rem_control info
## 'k5' :: AMT Remote Control
FAULT: 500 Can't connect to k5:16992 (Invalid argument)
(1)
k5% sudo ifconfig em0
em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
Hi,
say a process P1 wants to use the kernel to copy the content of a
buffer SRC (in its user address space) to a buffer DST (in the
address space of another process P2), and assume that P1 issues the
request to the kernel when P2 has already told the kernel where the
data should go:
P1
On 5/27/13 4:38 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
say a process P1 wants to use the kernel to copy the content of a
buffer SRC (in its user address space) to a buffer DST (in the
address space of another process P2), and assume that P1 issues the
request to the kernel when P2 has already told the
On 5/27/13 4:56 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 5/27/13 4:38 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
say a process P1 wants to use the kernel to copy the content of a
buffer SRC (in its user address space) to a buffer DST (in the
address space of another process P2), and assume that P1 issues the
request to
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:38:01AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
say a process P1 wants to use the kernel to copy the content of a
buffer SRC (in its user address space) to a buffer DST (in the
address space of another process P2), and assume that P1 issues the
request to the kernel when P2
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
say a process P1 wants to use the kernel to copy the content of a
buffer SRC (in its user address space) to a buffer DST (in the
address space of another process P2), and assume that P1 issues the
request to the kernel
19 matches
Mail list logo
