No UDP/TCP IPv6 connectivity (only) to router using gif interface - maybe ARM related

Hi, I tried to set up my raspberry PI as an ipv6 router. As a tunnel broker I use sixxs. Now I observed an interesting behavior: Every host from my network can reach the ipv6 world. The ipv6 world can also reach every host in my network. However - the router itself is unable to make udp or tcp co

[PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendmsg(2))

Please check in this patch: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181741 Please MFC into 9.X Description of the problem is within PR. Thanks, Yuri ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-curr

Re: how do i cross build world/kernel with clang?

Adrian Chadd wrote this message on Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 19:30 -0700: > How do i cross-build a mips world/kernel with clang? > > ie, how do I tell the build system to build a mips targetted clang instead > of gcc and use that to build everything? I finally figured out why my advice didn't work for

Re: 2013 MacBook Air Project

This is the info OSX gives me about the 11" 2013 MacBook Air. --- Software Versions: CoreWLAN: 3.4 (340.18) CoreWLANKit: 2.0.2 (202.11) Menu Extra: 8.1 (810.11) configd plug-in: 8.5 (850.252) System Information: 8.3 (830.5) IO80211 Family: 5.3 (530.5) Diagnostics: 2.1 (210.

Re: Question about socket timeouts

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Vitja Makarov >> wrote: >>> 2013/8/23 Davide Italiano : >>> >>> I think that for socket's timeouts it's ok to have a HZ-precision. It >>> would be much more important to implement high-precision timeouts fo

Re: Question about socket timeouts

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:03 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:05:06 pm John Baldwin wrote: >> On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:23:44 pm Davide Italiano wrote: >> > Please consider the following patch: >> > http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/review/socket_timeout.diff >> > I've tes

Re: GCC withdraw

On Sep 1, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:41:18AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >> So my take away from this is that you have no plans to support any platform >> that doesn't support clang as you just expect ia64 and sparc64 to die and >> not be present in 11.0.

Re: GCC withdraw

On 1 Sep 2013, at 19:03, Mark Linimon wrote: > If this is the case, IMHO: I was going to quote the whole mail, but actually this is enough. As I have already said in this thread, there is no such plan. I repeat, for those who missed it the first time: On 30 Aug 2013, at 16:11, David Chisnal

Re: 2013 MacBook Air Project

did you contribute this stuff back up to the linux driver? -adrian On 31 August 2013 21:30, Jason Birch wrote: > > Yup. I hope I get some positive responses from Broadcom. I really don't >> want to port the Linux driver(s), it's just plain silly. >> > > I've noticed a hell of a lot of problem

Re: GCC withdraw

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:41:18AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > So my take away from this is that you have no plans to support any platform > that doesn't support clang as you just expect ia64 and sparc64 to die and > not be present in 11.0. That may be the best path, but I've certainly not > seen

minor breakage with GCC after SVN r255112?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A missing quote inside a disabled code-section seems to upset GCC, i.e. *** sys/dev/virtio/network/if_vtnet.c~ Sun Sep 1 09:50:28 2013 - --- sys/dev/virtio/network/if_vtnet.c Sun Sep 1 10:54:06 2013 *** *** 1531,1537

Re: GCC withdraw

On 1 Sep 2013, at 02:53, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > I am worried about the definition of "polished". I held my tongue in Ottawa > in 2011 when Kirk wanted to turn SU+J on by default, since I figured he knew > what was going on much better than I did. Then, we discovered the bad > interactions b