TB --- 2013-12-16 08:03:49 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 08:03:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-12-16 07:26:58 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 07:26:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
Hi Kohji,
A regression issue has been reported when using the CHAIN-BIT patch. Can
you verify this additional patch on you hardware and report back?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/259462
Thank you!
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org ma
[ This message is cross-posted between x11@, current@ and ports@ for
maximum coverage. Please please PLEASE respect reply-to: ]
The xorg stack has been switched to use what has been dubbed new xorg in
CURRENT. This means new xserver, new MESA (dri/libGL) stack and in some
cases new versions.
If
From: Hans Petter Selasky
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:53:31 +0100
> Hi Kohji,
>
> A regression issue has been reported when using the CHAIN-BIT patch. Can you
> verify this additional patch on you hardware and report back?
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/259462
>
> Thank you!
>
> --
On 15.12.2013 22:22, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
FreeBSD gravity.local 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #7 r259286:
Fri Dec 13 00:33:37 EST 2013
eitan@gravity.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EADLER amd64
Complete textdump here: http://people.freebsd.org/
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
0n Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:16:52PM +1100, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:21:09PM -0800, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>C> > KERNCONF:
>C> >
>C> > options VIMAGE
>C> >
>C> > makeoptions DEBUG=-g
>C> >
>C> > device pf
>C> >
The second RC build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and
sparc64 architectures.
The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images
are av
Is it ok in kernel code to use __builtin_prefetch() and assume that
all supported compilers will do the right thing for all architectures ?
I am asking is because I need to use prefetch() in a small number
of places in my netmap code, and nothing in our kernel sources uses
__builtin_prefetch() dir
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 11:10:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
/usr/src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpdump/../../../contrib/tcpdump/addrtoname.c:36:10:
fatal error: 'libcapsicum.h' file not found
#include
I have, notably, WITHOUT_CAPSICUM=1 in /etc/src.conf.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
TB --- 2013-12-16 16:49:40 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 16:49:40 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
The following is a proof-of-concept patch to make system builds
less chatty.
It also has the nice side effect of showing more clearly
which rules are used during the build and possibly help
debugging the share/mk files and the individual Makefiles.
The logic is the following:
the environment/make
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> The following is a proof-of-concept patch to make system builds
> less chatty.
>
> It also has the nice side effect of showing more clearly
> which rules are used during the build and possibly help
> debugging the share/mk files and the indivi
TB --- 2013-12-16 19:08:08 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 19:08:08 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-12-16 18:33:18 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 18:33:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On 16 Dec 2013, at 19:46, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> The following is a proof-of-concept patch to make system builds
> less chatty.
>
> It also has the nice side effect of showing more clearly
> which rules are used during the build and possibly help
> debugging the share/mk files and the individual Ma
Hi guys!
I've investigate problem a bit. And can say that callout initialized with
callout_int(), w/o mpsafe flag:
callout_init(&vw->vw_proc_dead_timer, 0);
[sys/dev/vt/vt_core.c:1714]
And callout_init did not set CALLOUT_RETURNUNLOCKED flag, and assign it's
lock object to Giant, but where Giant l
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
>
> Hi guys!
>
> I've investigate problem a bit. And can say that callout initialized with
> callout_int(), w/o mpsafe flag:
> callout_init(&vw->vw_proc_dead_timer, 0);
> [sys/dev/vt/vt_core.c:1714]
> And callout_init did not set CALLOUT_RE
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:34:35 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:34:35 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:12:57 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:12:57 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
My bad, lemme go figure out what the hell causes this to break on
these platforms.
-a
On 16 December 2013 17:34, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PR
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-16 22:00:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:07:50 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-17 01:07:50 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-12-17 04:25:48 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-17 04:25:48 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-12-17 02:57:09 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-17 02:57:09 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
31 matches
Mail list logo