On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Robert_Burmeister <
robert.burmeis...@utoledo.edu> wrote:
> While base iconv replaces libiconv in FreeBSD 10,
> base iconv doesn't do utf-8 -> wchar_t,
> which is required by glib20, thus impacts thousands of ports.
>
> An entry in the FreeBSD 10 Errata stating th
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 13:46 -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 18:35 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > > on a freshly checked out HEAD,
> > > > "make toolchain" foll
.. and now with file:line information:
http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/netflix/20140218-pmcstat-callgraph-annotate-2.diff
It doesn't yet correctly handle klds - the address calculation stuff
isn't taking the load addr into account.
-a
_
if you
want to see what actually called it and where it called it from, in
order to trace things like "where's that memcpy actually coming from?"
http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/netflix/20140218-pmcstat-callgraph-annotate.diff
Thanks!
-a
_
Hi,
This patch binds the per-CPU timeout swi threads to the CPU they're on.
The scheduler may decide that a preempted kernel thread that's still
runnable and this can happen during things like per-CPU TCP timers
firing.
Thanks,
Index: sys/kern/kern_timeout.c
While base iconv replaces libiconv in FreeBSD 10,
base iconv doesn't do utf-8 -> wchar_t,
which is required by glib20, thus impacts thousands of ports.
An entry in the FreeBSD 10 Errata stating that iconv is now in the base
system,
however, that it does not include all the functionality of libico
Hello, Aleksandr.
You wrote 18 февраля 2014 г., 2:23:26:
AR> can you please test same setup but w/o vt(9). I understand you will not
AR> see kernel output, but Xorg should show up if problem related to vt(9).
AR> Or at least you can do ping test.
AR> But way with connected serial cable is best :)
..blah, the "filesystem code is all blocking.."
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 18 February 2014 10:28, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, February 17, 2014 6:24:21 am David Chisnall wrote:
>> P.S. If aio() is creating a new thread per request, rather than scheduling
> them from a pool, then that is also likely a bug. The aio APIs were designed
> so that systems with DMA co
root@pcbsd:/dev # stat /dev/ada0
1895890688 97 crw-rw-rw- 1 root operator 97 0 "Feb 18 10:52:11 2014" "Feb 17
09:36:43 2014" "Feb 17 09:36:43 2014" "Dec 31 17:59:59 1969" 4096 0 0 /dev/ada0
root@pcbsd:/dev # stat /dev/ada0p2
1895890688 103 crw-rw-rw- 1 root operator 103 0 "Feb 18 10:52:05 2014" "
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 13:46 -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 18:35 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > on a freshly checked out HEAD,
> > > "make toolchain" followed by "make buildkernel" fails at this stage:
> > >
> > >
On 18/02/2014 18:16, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:31:15 pm Michael Butler wrote:
>> Seems the old package management went EOL *way* before September .. none
>> of the docbook ports install now :-(
>>
>> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 183 packages
>> found (-1 +0
On Monday, February 17, 2014 6:24:21 am David Chisnall wrote:
> P.S. If aio() is creating a new thread per request, rather than scheduling
them from a pool, then that is also likely a bug. The aio APIs were designed
so that systems with DMA controllers could issue DMA requests in the syscall
an
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:31:15 pm Michael Butler wrote:
> Seems the old package management went EOL *way* before September .. none
> of the docbook ports install now :-(
>
> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 183 packages
> found (-1 +0) (...) done]
Hmm, does this mean you are usin
On Friday, February 14, 2014 1:42:05 pm Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 18:35 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > on a freshly checked out HEAD,
> > > "make toolchain" followed by "make buildkernel" fails at this stage:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:28:16 -0800
Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:10:25PM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
> > Is anyone else seeing firefox failing to install after the clang-3.4
> > merge? As in xpcshell dumping core ..
>
> Yes. Exact same error.
>
> > Executing
> > /usr/ports/ww
Seems the old package management went EOL *way* before September .. none
of the docbook ports install now :-(
[Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 183 packages
found (-1 +0) (...) done]
---> Installing the new version via the port
===> Staging for docbook241-2.4.1_2,1
===> docbook241-2.4.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:10:25PM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing firefox failing to install after the clang-3.4
> merge? As in xpcshell dumping core ..
Yes. Exact same error.
> Executing
> /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-i386-portbld-freebsd11.0/dist/bin/xpc
Is anyone else seeing firefox failing to install after the clang-3.4
merge? As in xpcshell dumping core ..
===> firefox-27.0.1,1 depends on shared library:
startup-notification-1.0 - found
===> firefox-27.0.1,1 depends on shared library: pulse.0 - found
gmake[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports
Hello, Aleksandr.
You wrote 18 февраля 2014 г., 2:23:26:
AR> can you please test same setup but w/o vt(9). I understand you will not
Ok, I'll do it tonight.
AR> see kernel output, but Xorg should show up if problem related to vt(9).
AR> Or at least you can do ping test.
AR> But way with connect
Dear Andriy and FreeBSD community,
No checksume errors or any other errors found for now.
Andriy Gapon wrote:
AG> on 18/02/2014 15:38 Vitalij Satanivskij said the following:
AG> > Dear Andriy and FreeBSD community,
AG> >
AG> > I'm testing you patch for sometime and looks like everything is ok.
on 18/02/2014 15:38 Vitalij Satanivskij said the following:
> Dear Andriy and FreeBSD community,
>
> I'm testing you patch for sometime and looks like everything is ok.
>
> At last for 5 day of working any notisible memory leak wos not found.
Vitalij,
thank you very much for testing!
What abou
on 18/02/2014 15:39 Jeremie Le Hen said the following:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:31:53PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> So, VV_ROOT is indeed set in v_vflag.
>> Thank you.
>
> So there's no need for me to reboot with kib's patch, right?
You better ask kib. I do not see any misbehavior in ZF
on 15/02/2014 22:02 Konstantin Belousov said the following:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:12:40PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 14/02/2014 21:18 Jeremie Le Hen said the following:
>>> I've just got another occurence of the exact same panic. Any clue how
>>> to debug this?
>>
>> Could you pleas
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:31:53PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> So, VV_ROOT is indeed set in v_vflag.
> Thank you.
So there's no need for me to reboot with kib's patch, right?
--
Jeremie Le Hen
Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Mor
Dear Andriy and FreeBSD community,
I'm testing you patch for sometime and looks like everything is ok.
At last for 5 day of working any notisible memory leak wos not found.
AG>
AG> I've been able to spend some time on this issue.
AG> Could you please try the following patch?
AG> http://people
on 18/02/2014 15:18 Jeremie Le Hen said the following:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:12:40PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 14/02/2014 21:18 Jeremie Le Hen said the following:
>>> I've just got another occurence of the exact same panic. Any clue how
>>> to debug this?
>>
>> Could you please obtai
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:12:40PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/02/2014 21:18 Jeremie Le Hen said the following:
> > I've just got another occurence of the exact same panic. Any clue how
> > to debug this?
>
> Could you please obtain *vp from frame 12 ?
Sure:
$1 = {v_tag = 0x81501
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 10:02:59PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:12:40PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 14/02/2014 21:18 Jeremie Le Hen said the following:
> > > I've just got another occurence of the exact same panic. Any clue how
> > > to debug this?
> >
> >
Disregard - pilot error. (It's not Feb 4...)
Lars
On 2014-2-18, at 9:50, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-2-16, at 21:06, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> I have just upgraded our copy of llvm/clang to 3.4 release, in r261991.
>
> I just done a "git pull" followed by a buildworld. Shouldn't I b
Hi,
On 2014-2-16, at 21:06, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> I have just upgraded our copy of llvm/clang to 3.4 release, in r261991.
I just done a "git pull" followed by a buildworld. Shouldn't I be having
version 3.4?
root@six:~ # dmesg | grep clang
FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183
31 matches
Mail list logo
