FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1152 - Failure:
Check console output at
https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1152/ to view the results.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
On 04/21/15 12:34, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:05:00PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
Final pkg 1.5.0 has been released.
Hi,
Is there a way the external SAT solver functionality can be memory
optimised? When trying to use this feature having +750
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:36:14PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 04/21/15 12:34, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:05:00PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
Final pkg 1.5.0 has been released.
Hi,
Is there a way the external SAT solver
FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1153 - Fixed:
Check console output at
https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1153/ to view the results.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
I'm trying to figure out how a driver is supposed to shut down its
interrupt-handling taskqueue when it detaches. taskqueue(9) recommends
disabling interrupts, draining each task and then freeing the taskqueue.
The problem that I have is the interrupt-handling tasks will sometimes
re-enable
But if you've disabled interrupts why would an interrupt-handling task
even run??
Jack
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how a driver is supposed to shut down its
interrupt-handling taskqueue when it detaches. taskqueue(9)
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
But if you've disabled interrupts why would an interrupt-handling task
even run??
Jack
There's a race. The task could have already have been scheduled by a
previous interrupt and could be running while I am trying to
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
But if you've disabled interrupts why would an interrupt-handling task
even run??
Jack
There's a race. The task could have already have been scheduled by
Or like, taskqueue_enqueue_if_not_draining() ? :p
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
But if you've disabled
Dear FreeBSD Community,
The deadline for the next FreeBSD Quarterly Status update is July 14,
2015, for work done in April through June.
Status report submissions do not have to be very long. They may be
about anything happening in the FreeBSD project and community, and
provide a great way to
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you mean, you want some KPI like
boolean taskqueue_is_draining(struct taskqueue *p);
so that e.g. executed task could see if it is executing in the
shutdown state ?
I'd prefer a KPI that stops a
Ya, that seems elegant.
Jack
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you mean, you want some KPI like
boolean taskqueue_is_draining(struct taskqueue *p);
so that e.g.
Ryan Stone wrote this message on Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 15:44 -0400:
I'm trying to figure out how a driver is supposed to shut down its
interrupt-handling taskqueue when it detaches. taskqueue(9) recommends
disabling interrupts, draining each task and then freeing the taskqueue.
The problem
13 matches
Mail list logo
