Re: The kern.ipc.somaxconn limit revisited.

On 2015-10-10 02:47, Adrian Chadd wrote: I think it's worth upping to an int type, so we can eventually up it to > 64k. Please do submit diffs for revie.w :) I'll work on the patch this week, thank you. -- White Knight I'm not from 2ch.net, I just work there.

A quick poll

Greetings, The topic of including /usr/local in the paths for compilers, linkers, etc has come up again. I’ve started a poll to judge sentiment in the community about what the default policy of FreeBSD should be in this regard. This topic has been much debated in the past. Those against it

r288669 breaks ports building with USE_GCC=yes

The default ports gcc for USE_GCC is still 4.8, which does not support -fstack-protector-strong. This breaks several ports including (from my poudriere run): libfpx and qt4-sqlite3-plugin. - Justin ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: r288669 breaks ports building with USE_GCC=yes

Hello; On 12/10/2015 02:56 p.m., Justin Hibbits wrote: The default ports gcc for USE_GCC is still 4.8, which does not support -fstack-protector-strong. This breaks several ports including (from my poudriere run): libfpx and qt4-sqlite3-plugin. - Justin r288669 only applies to base. It was

Re: r288669 breaks ports building with USE_GCC=yes

Hi again; On 12/10/2015 03:16 p.m., Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; On 12/10/2015 02:56 p.m., Justin Hibbits wrote: The default ports gcc for USE_GCC is still 4.8, which does not support -fstack-protector-strong. This breaks several ports including (from my poudriere run): libfpx and

Re: r288669 breaks ports building with USE_GCC=yes

Hi Pedro, On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hi again; > > On 12/10/2015 03:16 p.m., Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> >> Hello; >> >> On 12/10/2015 02:56 p.m., Justin Hibbits wrote: >>> >>> The default ports gcc for USE_GCC is still 4.8, which does not support >>>

Re: r288669 breaks ports building with USE_GCC=yes

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; > > On 12/10/2015 02:56 p.m., Justin Hibbits wrote: >> >> The default ports gcc for USE_GCC is still 4.8, which does not support >> -fstack-protector-strong. This breaks several ports including (from >> my poudriere

Re: r288669 breaks ports building with USE_GCC=yes

(CCing Gerald as this may involve a g++ bug as well.) Hello; On 12/10/2015 03:33 p.m., Justin Hibbits wrote: Hi Pedro, On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi again; On 12/10/2015 03:16 p.m., Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; On 12/10/2015 02:56 p.m., Justin

Re: r288669 breaks ports building with USE_GCC=yes

Hi Pedro, On Oct 12, 2015, at 7:23 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 10/12/2015 3:33 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote: Hi Pedro, On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi again; On 12/10/2015 03:16 p.m., Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; On 12/10/2015 02:56 p.m., Justin

Re: r288669 breaks ports building with USE_GCC=yes

On 10/12/2015 3:33 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote: Hi Pedro, On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi again; On 12/10/2015 03:16 p.m., Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; On 12/10/2015 02:56 p.m., Justin Hibbits wrote: The default ports gcc for USE_GCC is still 4.8,