I use gbde.
Can switch to geli, if required,
but please provide detailed instructions
for switching before removing gbde.
Anton
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 01:52:05AM -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
> Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
> > I use gbde.
> > Can switch to geli, if required,
> > but please provide detailed instructions
> > for switching before removing gbde.
>
> Such instructions would presumably be
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I use gbde.
> Can switch to geli, if required,
> but please provide detailed instructions
> for switching before removing gbde.
Such instructions would presumably be included in the UPDATING
entry.
An additional consideration: If there is no
Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 01:52:05AM -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
>
> > Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >
> > > I use gbde.
> > > Can switch to geli, if required,
> > > but please provide detailed instructions
> > > for switching before removing gbde.
>
On 19 October 2015 at 16:50, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> O. Hartmann wrote this message on Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:19 +0200:
>> For me, I'd like to know what is the benefit/performance of each technique
>> and
>> a clear preparation of each ones advantages over the other. That
Hi, Reference:
> From: John-Mark Gurney
> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:50:08 -0700
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> So, one thing that the docs talk about is that geli uses the crypto(9)
Interesting.
O. Hartmann wrote this message on Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:19 +0200:
> For me, I'd like to know what is the benefit/performance of each technique and
> a clear preparation of each ones advantages over the other. That would make
> the
> decission process much easier and hopefully would not scare
Hi all.
I recently added my own patch to bug
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187081
Can anyone take a look?
--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi Martin, thanks, that raises some interesting points. After reading PHK's
paper on GBDE, I can see enough differences between GDBE and GELI that
warrant keeping GDBE.
[ At this point for me, this part is theoretical, but it's still
interesting ] I've seen the concerned made a few times that we
Yonas Yanfa wrote on Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 06:36:19AM -0400:
>
> Is there any objection to removing gbde? How many people use gbde? When
> have you used gbde over geli, and why?
You would exclude all current users from accessing their existing
filesystems or whatever they put into that block
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:19:30 +0200
O. Hartmann wrote:
> When I looked for FreeBSD's encryption, I stopped by GELI. Because of
> it's easy-to-use AND the 'experimental' tag in the handbook!
>
> For me, I'd like to know what is the benefit/performance of each
> technique and a clear preparation
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> Yonas Yanfa wrote on Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 06:36:19AM -0400:
>>
>> Is there any objection to removing gbde? How many people use gbde? When
>> have you used gbde over geli, and why?
>
> You would exclude all current users
Ed Maste wrote this message on Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 17:13 -0400:
> On 19 October 2015 at 16:50, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > O. Hartmann wrote this message on Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:19 +0200:
> >> For me, I'd like to know what is the benefit/performance of each technique
> >>
In message
, NGie
Cooper writes:
>1. Why are there 2 competing technologies?
They are not competing, they support two very different threat models.
>3. Is there a gain/loss for removing gbde?
Yes, you alienate a lot
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Ed Maste wrote this message on Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 17:13 -0400:
On 19 October 2015 at 16:50, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote this message on Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:19 +0200:
For me, I'd like to know what is the
In message <20151019234855.4ed82...@gumby.homeunix.com>, RW writes:
>I certainly wouldn't like to see gbde removed but I think it is
>unfortunate that it's given slightly greater prominence in the handbook
>than geli. geli is the right choice for most people.
This I fully agree with.
16 matches
Mail list logo