CURRENT [r312928] TCP_RFC7413 kernel panic

Hello, The most recent CURRENT [r312928] with enabled kernel option TCP_RFC7413 panics spontaneously: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1; apic id = 02 fault virtual address = 0x28 fault code = supervisor read data, page not present instruction pointer =

pkg, base packages and subdirectories

Hi All, I've created my base repo and installed the OS from packages. All in all it all went rather smooth! As for pkg it seems to not pay attention to base library subdirs: - # pkg check -Ba Checking all packages: 3% (FreeBSD-kernel-sm-12.0.s20170128125723) /boot/kernel/kernel -

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote: > ... > >> After some creative hacking... tada! >> >> # find /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/ -type f -name \*zfsboot -exec ls -l {} \; >> -rw-r--r--

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote: ... > After some creative hacking... tada! > > # find /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/ -type f -name \*zfsboot -exec ls -l {} \; > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 131584 Jan 28 12:07 > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/zfsboot/zfsboot

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Allan Jude wrote: ... > The 'zfsboot' version, is dd's into the zfs boot code area. It is read > by the assembly code there. It is important the file be the size that > will be read, so it is padded out. That file is currently only used

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On 2017-01-28 15:17, Ngie Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Ngie Cooper wrote: >>> What created a partition that small? >> >> Me. >> >> gpart up until last summer said that users should create 44kB >> freebsd-boot partitions -- des@ corrected that in

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Ngie Cooper wrote: >> What created a partition that small? > > Me. > > gpart up until last summer said that users should create 44kB > freebsd-boot partitions -- des@ corrected that in r303289: > > -This example uses 88 blocks (44 kB) so

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Allan Jude wrote: >> On 2017-01-28 13:56, Ngie Cooper wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Warner Losh wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> So?

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

> What created a partition that small? Me. gpart up until last summer said that users should create 44kB freebsd-boot partitions -- des@ corrected that in r303289: -This example uses 88 blocks (44 kB) so the next partition will be -aligned on a 64 kB boundary without the need to specify an

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On 2017-01-28 14:04, Ngie Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Allan Jude wrote: >> On 2017-01-28 13:56, Ngie Cooper wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Warner Losh wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> So? It literally doesn't matter where the

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2017-01-28 13:56, Ngie Cooper wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> So? It literally doesn't matter where the freebsd-boot partition >>> lives, or what it's

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On 2017-01-28 13:56, Ngie Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > ... > >> So? It literally doesn't matter where the freebsd-boot partition >> lives, or what it's number is. You can put it at the start or end of >> the swap partition after

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Warner Losh wrote: ... > So? It literally doesn't matter where the freebsd-boot partition > lives, or what it's number is. You can put it at the start or end of > the swap partition after adjusting its size. I've done this on several >

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

> On 28. jaan 2017, at 18:56, Warner Losh wrote: > >> >> >> at $JOB we are just testing a script that expands the root zfs partition on >> in-field appliances by shaving a bit off swap and cannibalising a small data >> partition we don't really use. I see we only left 64K for

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 6:43 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 28/1/17 4:16 am, Ngie Cooper wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 27, 2017, at 09:05, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> I'm curious why you can't find the space for a bigger partition? >>> Almost all drives

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On 28/1/17 1:35 am, Allan Jude wrote: On 2017-01-27 12:33, Shawn Webb wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:30:17PM -0500, Allan Jude wrote: On 2017-01-27 12:05, Warner Losh wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Toomas Soome wrote: On 27. jaan 2017, at 1:40, Ngie Cooper

Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

On 28/1/17 4:16 am, Ngie Cooper wrote: On Jan 27, 2017, at 09:05, Warner Losh wrote: ... I'm curious why you can't find the space for a bigger partition? Almost all drives these days are partitioned with a little wasted space, and that wasted space should be more than enough

Re: CURRENT [r309933] broke syslogd on IPv4 only system

Hi, Alex Deiter wrote in : al> Hello, al> al> Please take a look SVN r309933: (snip) al> Successfully tested on IPv4-only CURRENT r312856M. Thank you for your report. r312921 should fix this problem. Please let me

CURRENT [r309933] broke syslogd on IPv4 only system

Hello, Please take a look SVN r309933: r309933 | hrs | 2016-12-12 22:33:40 +0300 (Mon, 12 Dec 2016) | 13 lines - Refactor listening socket list. All of the listening sockets are now maintained in a single linked-list in

Re: malloc() call somehow calling the rtld malloc() implementaion

On 27 Jan, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:47:20 -0800 (PST) > Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 27 Jan, Alexander Kabaev wrote: >> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:31:30 -0800 (PST) >> > Don Lewis wrote: >> >> >> If I create a simple test program

Re: malloc() call somehow calling the rtld malloc() implementaion

On 27 Jan, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:19:16PM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: >> On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:31:30 -0800 (PST) >> Don Lewis wrote: >> > If I create a simple test program that calls malloc() and set a >> > breakpoint in malloc(), the