On 2017-Apr-27, at 10:26 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> [As the text does not really follow from the earlier text
> I'd sent directly I'm top posting a hypothesis about where
> so much active memory came from to be so low in available
> memory to get an reclaim_pv_chunk attempt.]
>
> My hypothesis is
On 2017-Apr-30, at 9:40 AM, Andrew Turner wrote:
>> On 30 Apr 2017, at 12:02, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-Apr-30, at 1:57 AM, Andrew Turner wrote:
>>
On 30 Apr 2017, at 04:29, Mark Millard wrote:
...
acpi0:
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
acpi0: Sleep Button (fixe
> On 30 Apr 2017, at 12:02, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> On 2017-Apr-30, at 1:57 AM, Andrew Turner wrote:
>
>>> On 30 Apr 2017, at 04:29, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> ...
>>> acpi0:
>>> acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
>>> acpi0: Sleep Button (fixed)
>>
>> ACPI is not fully supported on arm64.
>
> Good t
On 2017-Apr-30, at 1:57 AM, Andrew Turner wrote:
>> On 30 Apr 2017, at 04:29, Mark Millard wrote:
>> ...
>> acpi0:
>> acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
>> acpi0: Sleep Button (fixed)
>
> ACPI is not fully supported on arm64.
Good to know. Thanks.
But the messages:
No valid device tree blob found!
> On 30 Apr 2017, at 04:29, Mark Millard wrote:
> ...
> acpi0:
> acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
> acpi0: Sleep Button (fixed)
ACPI is not fully supported on arm64.
Andrew
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
