On 2/28/19 11:24 AM, Cy Schubert wrote:
> On February 28, 2019 11:21:24 AM PST, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:14:51AM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote:
>>> On February 28, 2019 11:06:46 AM PST, Conrad Meyer
>> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Steve Kargl
wrote:
>>>
On February 28, 2019 11:21:24 AM PST, Steve Kargl
wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:14:51AM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote:
>> On February 28, 2019 11:06:46 AM PST, Conrad Meyer
>wrote:
>> >On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Steve Kargl
>> > wrote:
>> >> This is interesting as well. Does this mean tha
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:14 PM Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 11:06 -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Steve Kargl
> > wrote:
> > > This is interesting as well. Does this mean that amd64 is now
> > > the only tier 1 platform and all other architectures
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:46 PM John Baldwin wrote:
> On 2/28/19 11:14 AM, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > On February 28, 2019 11:06:46 AM PST, Conrad Meyer
> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Steve Kargl
> >> wrote:
> >>> This is interesting as well. Does this mean that amd64 is now
> >>>
On 2/28/19 11:14 AM, Cy Schubert wrote:
> On February 28, 2019 11:06:46 AM PST, Conrad Meyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Steve Kargl
>> wrote:
>>> This is interesting as well. Does this mean that amd64 is now
>>> the only tier 1 platform and all other architectures are after
>>> t
On 2/28/19 10:32 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 09:09:38AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>> You can do all your tests directly on amd64 by just adding
>> "-m32" to compile i386 binaries against the libraries in /usr/lib32
>> and you will generate the same i386 binaries as if you were
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:14:51AM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote:
> On February 28, 2019 11:06:46 AM PST, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Steve Kargl
> > wrote:
> >> This is interesting as well. Does this mean that amd64 is now
> >> the only tier 1 platform and all other archit
On February 28, 2019 11:06:46 AM PST, Conrad Meyer wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>> This is interesting as well. Does this mean that amd64 is now
>> the only tier 1 platform and all other architectures are after
>> thoughts?
>
>This has been the de facto truth for
On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 11:06 -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Steve Kargl
> wrote:
> > This is interesting as well. Does this mean that amd64 is now
> > the only tier 1 platform and all other architectures are after
> > thoughts?
>
> This has been the de facto truth f
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Steve Kargl
wrote:
> This is interesting as well. Does this mean that amd64 is now
> the only tier 1 platform and all other architectures are after
> thoughts?
This has been the de facto truth for years. i386 is mostly only
supported by virtue of sharing code wi
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 09:09:38AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 2/23/19 8:39 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 08:32:23AM -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 12:44 AM Steve Kargl
> >> wrote:
> >>> Ideas?
> >>> ...
> >>> +CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T
On 2/23/19 8:39 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 08:32:23AM -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 12:44 AM Steve Kargl
>> wrote:
>>> Ideas?
>>> ...
>>> +CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz (1995.04-MHz
>>> 686-class CPU)
>>>Origin="GenuineIntel
12 matches
Mail list logo
