Re: ZFS BE not booting

2020-05-25 Thread Clay Daniels
> > [... snip ...] > > > Is there something I'm perhaps missing regarding loader.conf and/or > rc.conf ? > I may be wrong, but it looks like a "framebuffer problem" that is most often associated with amdgpu, but may help your i915 intel graphics too. Just try adding this to /boot/loader.conf :

Re: ZFS BE not booting

2020-05-25 Thread marco
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 08:13:16PM +, you (marco) sent the following to [freebsd-current] : > > I took 3 pictures of the system dropping to the debugger for r360723. > 1st 2 pictures are right before the panic and the final the panic screen > itself. > It seems the panic occurs right before

Re: ZFS BE not booting

2020-05-25 Thread marco
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:28:39AM -0500, you (Kyle Evans) sent the following to [freebsd-current] : > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 3:51 AM marco > wrote: > > > > [... snip ...] > > Is there something I'm perhaps missing regarding loader.conf and/or rc.conf > > ? > > It could just be these 2

Re: Panic when attempting to create tunnel when a tunnel with the named alias exists

2020-05-25 Thread Kyle Evans
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 2:22 PM Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > > From the "Why did you do that?" department: > > I stumbled across a panic in 12.1-stable and 13-current. If you > attempt to create a tunnel, which would have the same name as > an already existing tunnel "alias" hardlink, you get a

Panic when attempting to create tunnel when a tunnel with the named alias exists

2020-05-25 Thread Jamie Landeg-Jones
>From the "Why did you do that?" department: I stumbled across a panic in 12.1-stable and 13-current. If you attempt to create a tunnel, which would have the same name as an already existing tunnel "alias" hardlink, you get a panic. E.G: # ifconfig tun create name tun1 # ifcondif tun create

Re: FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-05-24

2020-05-25 Thread Alan Somers
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:51 AM Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > (Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.) > > FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-05-24 > === > > Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the > period > from

FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-05-24

2020-05-25 Thread Li-Wen Hsu
(Please send the followup to freebsd-testing@ and note Reply-To is set.) FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2020-05-24 === Here is a summary of the FreeBSD Continuous Integration results for the period from 2020-05-18 to 2020-05-24. During this period, we have: * 2064

Re: ZFS BE not booting

2020-05-25 Thread Kyle Evans
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 3:51 AM marco wrote: > > [... snip ...] > Is there something I'm perhaps missing regarding loader.conf and/or rc.conf ? > It could just be these 2 specific revisions and will try another revision but > perhaps I need to do something setting the zfs bootcode again using

Re: lockups on lenovo p43s under current

2020-05-25 Thread Pete Wright
On 5/11/20 3:16 PM, Pete Wright wrote: hello, i have a lenovo thinkpad P43s that exhibits lockups under CURRENT but behaves fine when running STABLE.  i've tried to find a fully reproducible situation to get this system to lockup but haven't found anything yet.  i am starting to suspect

ZFS BE not booting

2020-05-25 Thread marco
returning FreeBSD user here, using bectl for the 1st time on a thinkpad x230 with 16GB of RAM. bectl list -aDs BE/Dataset/Snapshot Active Mountpoint Space Created r359556 zroot/ROOT/r359556 NR / 12.2G 2020-04-03 20:05

drm drivers project report (week of May 11th and May 18th)

2020-05-25 Thread Emmanuel Vadot
Hello all, First of all sorry for forgetting to send a report last week. A lot happened in two weeks. We are now 98% synced with Linux 5.2 and I've taggued a release yesterday (https://github.com/freebsd/drm-kmod/releases/tag/drm_v5.2_8) and this is now in ports in graphics/drm-devel-kmod

efirtc + atrtc at the same time

2020-05-25 Thread Andriy Gapon
I see that on my laptop both efirtc and atrtc get attached. The latter is via an ACPI attachment: efirtc0: efirtc0: registered as a time-of-day clock, resolution 1.00s atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0 atrtc0: registered as a time-of-day clock, resolution 1.00s I am not sure if this is