Re: acpi_wmi noisy without EC

2020-11-17 Thread Vladimir Kondratyev
On 2020-11-17 03:00, Yuri Pankov wrote: I have started seeing the following on boot since some time: acpi_wmi0: on acpi0 acpi_wmi0: cannot find EC device device_attach: acpi_wmi0 attach returned 6 acpi_wmi0: on acpi0 acpi_wmi0: cannot find EC device device_attach: acpi_wmi0 attach returned 6 a

Re: acpi_wmi noisy without EC

2020-11-17 Thread Vladimir Kondratyev
On 2020-11-17 10:57, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: On 2020-11-17 03:00, Yuri Pankov wrote: I have started seeing the following on boot since some time: acpi_wmi0: on acpi0 acpi_wmi0: cannot find EC device device_attach: acpi_wmi0 attach returned 6 acpi_wmi0: on acpi0 acpi_wmi0: cannot find EC de

Re: in -current is svn still canonical?

2020-11-17 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Warner Losh and my last message: > > Thanks for the information, but if you feel the need to send me a > > not-quite-CC, please don't send me the multipart/alternative version when > > you send the plain-text version to the list. > > I hate multipart/alternative! > I must apologize.

Re: in -current is svn still canonical?

2020-11-17 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 02:48:32 +, "Thomas Mueller" wrote: > from tech-lists: > > > As subject - is svn still canonical for -current or is it git now? > > If it's not git now, when roughly is the intended switch? > > I recently updated FreeBSD doc, ports, src (current), and src12 (12-stabl

Re: in -current is svn still canonical?

2020-11-17 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:32:38PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > ... > However, when you make the switch to git (either due to the flag day and > tracking -current, or jumping from svn on a stable branch), there's no tool > to convert the subversion checked out tree to a git tree. The needed > inform

Re: acpi_wmi noisy without EC

2020-11-17 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, at 11:07 AM, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: > On 2020-11-17 10:57, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: > > On 2020-11-17 03:00, Yuri Pankov wrote: > >> I have started seeing the following on boot since some time: > >> > >> acpi_wmi0: on acpi0 > >> acpi_wmi0: cannot find EC device > >> de

Re: acpi_wmi noisy without EC

2020-11-17 Thread Vladimir Kondratyev
On 2020-11-17 15:29, Yuri Pankov wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, at 11:07 AM, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: On 2020-11-17 10:57, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: > On 2020-11-17 03:00, Yuri Pankov wrote: >> I have started seeing the following on boot since some time: >> >> acpi_wmi0: on acpi0 >> acpi_wmi0:

Re: in -current is svn still canonical?

2020-11-17 Thread Gary Palmer
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 09:25:32AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Warner Losh and my last message: > > > > Thanks for the information, but if you feel the need to send me a > > > not-quite-CC, please don't send me the multipart/alternative version when > > > you send the plain-text version to

Re: acpi_wmi noisy without EC

2020-11-17 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: > On 2020-11-17 15:29, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, at 11:07 AM, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: > >> On 2020-11-17 10:57, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: > >> > On 2020-11-17 03:00, Yuri Pankov wrote: > >> >> I have started seeing

Re: in -current is svn still canonical?

2020-11-17 Thread Filippo Moretti
For  user will git be in the base system or should we install from ports/pkg?Filippo On Tuesday, November 17, 2020, 12:38:00 PM GMT+1, David Wolfskill wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:32:38PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > ... > However, when you make the switch to git (either due to th

Samba kernel panics.

2020-11-17 Thread Johan Hendriks
Hello all after updating FreeBSD13 from r367724 to r367755 my samba server craches the server. I did rebuild samba 4.11 but that does not help. The output on the console is the following. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid =3; apic id = 06 fault virtual address    = 0x803a122b

Re: in -current is svn still canonical?

2020-11-17 Thread Warner Losh
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 4:04 AM Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 02:48:32 +, "Thomas Mueller" > wrote: > > > from tech-lists: > > > > > As subject - is svn still canonical for -current or is it git now? > > > If it's not git now, when roughly is the intended switch? > > > > I

Re: in -current is svn still canonical?

2020-11-17 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:13 PM Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día lunes, noviembre 16, 2020 a las 10:32:38p. m. -0700, Warner Losh > escribió: > > > For the supported stable branches, you'll be able to download via > > subversion and switch over at any time before the end of project support > > for

Re: in -current is svn still canonical?

2020-11-17 Thread Warner Losh
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:25 AM Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Warner Losh and my last message: > > > > Thanks for the information, but if you feel the need to send me a > > > not-quite-CC, please don't send me the multipart/alternative version > when > > > you send the plain-text version to the li

Re: Samba kernel panics.

2020-11-17 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:20:31PM +0100, Johan Hendriks wrote: > Hello all after updating FreeBSD13 from r367724 to r367755 my samba server > craches the server. > I did rebuild samba 4.11 but that does not help. > > The output on the console is the following. > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while

Re: Samba kernel panics.

2020-11-17 Thread Mark Johnston
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 08:19:12PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:20:31PM +0100, Johan Hendriks wrote: > > Hello all after updating FreeBSD13 from r367724 to r367755 my samba server > > craches the server. > > I did rebuild samba 4.11 but that does not help. > > > >

Re: Samba kernel panics.

2020-11-17 Thread Kyle Evans
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:01 PM Mark Johnston wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 08:19:12PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:20:31PM +0100, Johan Hendriks wrote: > > > Hello all after updating FreeBSD13 from r367724 to r367755 my samba server > > > craches the serv