On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 05:21:13PM +0200, Marek Zarychta wrote:
> Running DHCPv6 in a jail is possible and pretty straigtforward if
> /dev/bpf is exposed, but I have never tried to run rtadvd(8) in the
> jail. The net/isc-dhcp44-server works flawlessy in dedicated DHCPv6
> reduntant jails without V
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 12:14:20PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
> I think it will help if you share more of your configuration/logs.
Inside non-vnet jail, this is ifconfig output
cbsd0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
description: lagg0
ether 58:9c:fc:10:9b:75
inet 172.16.0.253 ne
Dnia Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:11:29AM +0200, Goran Mekić napisał(a):
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 02:34:11PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > I assume you have /dev/bpf available inside that jail by a devfs rule so
> > effectively you have all network interfaces and traffic available?
> As a form of te
Is it time for WARNS=7 in the Makefiles?
Regards,
Ronald.
Van: Mateusz Guzik
Datum: dinsdag, 29 maart 2022 13:15
Aan: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: "set but not used" warnings in the kernel
This is way too spammy and there is no consistent effort to clean them up,
that I can see any
This is way too spammy and there is no consistent effort to clean them up,
that I can see anyway.
As such, I think these warns are doing more damage than help and should be
disabled by default.
Alternatively, perhaps people can step up. I'm pretty sure to date I got
rid of more of these than anyo
Van: "Goran Mekic"
Datum: dinsdag, 29 maart 2022 10:11
Aan: "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
CC: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: DHCPDv6 in non-vnet jail
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 02:34:11PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> I assume you have /dev/bpf available inside that jail by a devfs rule so
> eff
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 02:34:11PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> I assume you have /dev/bpf available inside that jail by a devfs rule so
> effectively you have all network interfaces and traffic available?
As a form of test I've put rtadvd inside the same non-vnet jail and I
can see RA message ar