> On Nov 16, 2023, at 20:06, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:07:29 +0100, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 5:10 PM Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> OK, I am now running GENERIC-NODEBUG + "options TCPHPTS".
>>>
>>> After setting "sysctl
> On Nov 16, 2023, at 14:05, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 13:06:03 +0100, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:13:05 +0100, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> recently the main branch was changed to build the TCP RACK stack
> On Nov 16, 2023, at 13:06, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:13:05 +0100, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> recently the main branch was changed to build the TCP RACK stack
>> which is a loadable kernel module, by default:
>>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:22:52PM +, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> > Ok. I do not know what exactly is your point, but releases are never
> > official until there is a PGP-signed email sent. The email is intended
> > for the general public of consumers of official releases, not "yeah,
> >
Hi,
I seem to remember changes related to that a while ago but my cache
is miss for the actual change. Are we suppoed to handle this case?
It would be nice if "reset" would reset again the first time ...
KDB: enter: Break to debugger
[ thread pid 11 tid 15 ]
Stopped at
> Ok. I do not know what exactly is your point, but releases are never
> official until there is a PGP-signed email sent. The email is intended
> for the general public of consumers of official releases, not "yeah,
> but"s.
Foe a recent new build, I just went to the ftp site to grab the latest
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 19:07:29 +0100, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 5:10 PM Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>
> >
> > OK, I am now running GENERIC-NODEBUG + "options TCPHPTS".
> >
> > After setting "sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=rack" git no
> > longer works:
> >
> >
>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 5:10 PM Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>
> OK, I am now running GENERIC-NODEBUG + "options TCPHPTS".
>
> After setting "sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=rack" git no
> longer works:
>
>
Are you using a fresh 15 head or a specific network setup ?
Because I'm not able to
W dniu 16.11.2023 o 10:13, tue...@freebsd.org pisze:
Dear all,
recently the main branch was changed to build the TCP RACK stack
which is a loadable kernel module, by default:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3a338c534154164504005beb00a3c6feb03756cc
That's really good news and
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 13:06:03 +0100, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:13:05 +0100, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > recently the main branch was changed to build the TCP RACK stack
> > which is a loadable kernel module, by default:
> >
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:07:36AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> And if there is a reason to reissue a release, the update will reflect such.
>
> So to answer your latter question, yes. Unless it needs to be replaced.
>
> Glen
> Sent from my phone.
> Please excuse my brevity and/or typos.
>
> >
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:13:05 +0100, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> recently the main branch was changed to build the TCP RACK stack
> which is a loadable kernel module, by default:
> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3a338c534154164504005beb00a3c6feb03756cc
>
> As
Dear all,
recently the main branch was changed to build the TCP RACK stack
which is a loadable kernel module, by default:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3a338c534154164504005beb00a3c6feb03756cc
As discussed on the bi-weekly transport call, it would be great if people
could test the RACK
Moin-moin!
After upgrade to recent -current (153) I've got a ld error for 32bit an
aarch64 machine:(
ELF binary type "9" not known.
eval: /libexec/ld-elf32.so.1: Exec format error
Snapshot from 2023-10-13 was fine, no errors
15.0-CURRENT #0 main-6f38d2e7b0: Thu Nov 16 03:29:03 MSK 2023
14 matches
Mail list logo
