$ git bisect good
b377ff8110e3489eb6e6b920b51a2384dfc4eb0b is the first bad commit
> On Feb 9, 2024, at 8:13 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> Summary:
>
> pcib0: mem 0x7d50-0x7d50930f
> irq 80,81 on simplebus2
> pcib0: parsing FDT for ECAM0:
> pcib0: PCI addr: 0xc000, CPU addr:
Summary:
pcib0: mem 0x7d50-0x7d50930f
irq 80,81 on simplebus2
pcib0: parsing FDT for ECAM0:
pcib0: PCI addr: 0xc000, CPU addr: 0x6, Size: 0x4000
. .
rman_manage_region: request: start 0x6, end
0x6000f
panic: Failed to add resource to rman
Detail:
. .
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 10:23 AM Matthew L. Dailey
wrote:
>
> I had my first kernel panic with a KASAN kernel after only 01:27. This
> first panic was a "double fault," which isn't anything we've seen
> previously - usually we've seen trap 9 or trap 12, but sometimes others.
> Based on the
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 10:11:14PM +, Matthew L. Dailey wrote:
> On 2/9/24 4:18 PM, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > [You don't often get email from ma...@freebsd.org. Learn why this is
> > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 06:23:08PM +,
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 2:04 PM Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
>
> Just in case it's relevant, I'm carrying around this patch on my fairly busy
> little RISC-V machine.
>
> diff --git a/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clvnops.c b/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clvnops.c
> index 0b8c587a542c..85c0ebd7a10f 100644
> ---
On 2/9/24 4:18 PM, Mark Johnston wrote:
> [You don't often get email from ma...@freebsd.org. Learn why this is
> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 06:23:08PM +, Matthew L. Dailey wrote:
>> I had my first kernel panic with a KASAN
Just in case it's relevant, I'm carrying around this patch on my fairly
busy little RISC-V machine.
diff --git a/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clvnops.c b/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clvnops.c
index 0b8c587a542c..85c0ebd7a10f 100644
--- a/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clvnops.c
+++ b/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clvnops.c
@@
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 06:23:08PM +, Matthew L. Dailey wrote:
> I had my first kernel panic with a KASAN kernel after only 01:27. This
> first panic was a "double fault," which isn't anything we've seen
> previously - usually we've seen trap 9 or trap 12, but sometimes others.
> Based on
I had my first kernel panic with a KASAN kernel after only 01:27. This
first panic was a "double fault," which isn't anything we've seen
previously - usually we've seen trap 9 or trap 12, but sometimes others.
Based on the backtrace, it definitely looks like KASAN caught something,
but I don't
On 2/9/24 11:04 AM, Mark Johnston wrote:
> [You don't often get email from ma...@freebsd.org. Learn why this is
> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:34:52PM +, Matthew L. Dailey wrote:
>> Good morning all,
>>
>> Per Rick Macklem's
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:34:52PM +, Matthew L. Dailey wrote:
> Good morning all,
>
> Per Rick Macklem's suggestion, I'm posting this query here in the hopes
> that other may have ideas.
>
> We did do some minimal testing with ufs around this problem back in
> August, but hadn't narrowed
11 matches
Mail list logo
