On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:52 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:46:17 +0100
> Dimitry Andric schrieb:
>
> > On 14 Dec 2017, at 14:43, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > >
> > > Am Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:09:39 +0100
> > > Daniel Nebdal schrieb:
> > >> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:48 PM, O. Hartmann
Recently I upgraded my system to head from 10-stable:
11.0-CURRENT #0 r293760:
iwn0: mem 0xe3c0-0xe3c01fff irq 17 at
device 0.0 on pci2
net.wlan.debug: 1
net.wlan.0.debug: 1
wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
ether 24:77:03:07:32:b8
inet 192.168.254.21 netmask 0xff00 broa
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Steve Kargl <
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 01:23:00PM -0500, Allan Jude wrote:
> > On 2014-11-16 13:07, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > In init(8), one finds under DIAGNOSISTICS
> > >
> > >"some processes would not die; ps axl a
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi,
> Any tips for Android / FreeBSD BSD tools for connectivity etc ?
>
> I just got a Samsung Galaxy Note 3, with Android 4.4.2 kernel 3.4.0
>
> It directs me to
> https://www.android.com/filetransfer/
> which seems binary for ma
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:41 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> >
> > As already described by Dan and perhaps not followed up on: dedup
> > requires at very large amount of memory. Assuming 32GB is sufficient
> > is most likely wrong.
> >
> > What does zdb -S BACKUP00 say?
>
> That command is stuck for 2
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 2:11 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 10:14:26 +1100
> Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> > On 2014-Jan-04 23:26:42 +0100, "O. Hartmann"
> > wrote:
> > >zfs list -r BACKUP00
> > >NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> > >BACKUP00 1.48T 1.19T 144K /B
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a Asus Sabertooth 990FXv2 motherboard, and a run of the mill
> NetGear DGS2205 desktop gig switch
>
> with linux my Ethernet can negotiate at 1GB but with FreeBSD it can not
> if I force the device to 1000baseT with
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Teske, Devin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to bring up the discussion for topic..
>
> Importing libdispatch (aka Apple's Grand Central Dispatch) into base
> (contrib?).
>
> Specifically into HEAD then MFC'd only as far back as stable/10.
>
> Here's the reason why:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
>
> I would like to see RCS remain in base as well. Many enterprise distro
> still ship it by default too. There is no compelling reason to remove it.
>
I sort of retract that statement. I thought the base RCS was already
as A YEAR AGO, was hidden under a differnet title,
> and DID NOT RESULT
> in a clear mandate to remove RCS.
>
> Please put it back, and inthe mena while while we discuss it properly this
> time, please revert the commit
> (official request.. as described in the group
eCD, Ill let you know if
> that worked :-)
You probalby want a filesystem tool but it's impossible to tell since you
didn't include all the relevant info. Try fsck.
If you did want a "badblocks" tool from the base system, /sbin/recoverdisk
is the best. dd is fine,
t found
> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache22: WARNING: failed to start apache22
>
> If I run /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache22 restart from the command line, I
> can restart httpd without trouble.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
I would guess you need /usr/sbin/ in cron's path.
--
Adam Vande M
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Chuck Burns wrote:
> The ones who want the old pf can maintain it.. those who want the new one,
> can maintain *it*.
This is beach front property on Fantasy Island. There isn't even enough
manpower to sufficiently support one currently.
--
Adam
know absolutely nothing.
>
Not to speak for Steve, but he provided this information in another thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-September/036410.html
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing lis
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
>
There is this:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/4.7/sys/miscfs/kernfs/
--
the proposed
change makes it less readable. Otherwise, these mostly seem overdue.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
e Internet? I really
> don't
> know, that's why I'm asking. :)
>
While such wording may be helpful to a new user over completely absent
directions, it's technically flawed. You don't need an internet connection,
but rather a network connection or some o
o date,
> build a release and reinstall but I don't know if the problem has been
> fixed. I'll probably give it a try. It isn't that much of a deal.
>
Hopefully I add something of value to this thread, but as a workaround you
can use a PCBSD image a
t's better done by pre-deployment
planning rather than after. If one of the new installer proposals handled
this automatically, even better.
My point is that device names are still an important hint to functionality
particularly for auto-deployment/configure settings w
te useful.
I'm testing on a FreeBSD Virtualbox Host/Guest. Guest is CURRENT
kern.osrevision: 199506 virtualbox-ose-3.2.10_2
My particular version of Virtualbox isn't optimized yet for virtio I
believe, but I did see about 1/3 higher peak b
org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=114928&cat=
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a lot easier to have a nice article on installing
> /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-* from the date of the release of the installed
> system? Or maybe offer archive web access to a handbook snapshot from that
>
jango does something similar)? Maintaining separate handbook branches
seems unrealistic if there aren't enough doc contributors to maintain one to
expectations, and IME discrepancies aren't very frequent.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-curr
or others I imagine as well.
It's a VERY big inconvenience sometimes to visit a datacenter when you
thought you had a rock solid remote setup in place.
In defense of the current behavior, you can get basically the same behavior
by setting up a PXE boot system, but that is not always des
stab to reflect block
dev changes, gstripe doesn't. I honestly wasn't aware ataraid could boot a
striped volume, if so it does something geom can't.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
ces, zfs, etc at least in one person's
testbed. I know that's it's been tried before but there are actually
screenshots from it.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-April/016418.html
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-c
or RELEASE that is
rebuilt say weekly which would resolve most of the problems I run into and
address some the non-power users desires as well. Anyways, I'm sure this
will be an entertaining thread.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.o
as you want vanilla apps, but they are a major
PITA for many types of customizations which are a breeze with the ports
tree. You'd be killing of one of the more elegant approaches in FreeBSD.
Sure there are problem with it, but IMO adoptin
28 matches
Mail list logo
