Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-10 Thread Alexandre Martins
Le vendredi 10 mars 2017, 16:46:26 Konstantin Belousov a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:30:21PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > Le vendredi 10 mars 2017, 15:57:16 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:24:52PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote:

Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-10 Thread Alexandre Martins
Le vendredi 10 mars 2017, 15:57:16 Konstantin Belousov a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:24:52PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 16:25:17 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 02:52:09PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: >

Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-10 Thread Alexandre Martins
Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 16:25:17 Konstantin Belousov a écrit : > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 02:52:09PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 15:07:54 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:59:27AM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: >

Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-09 Thread Alexandre Martins
Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 16:25:17 Konstantin Belousov a écrit : > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 02:52:09PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 15:07:54 Konstantin Belousov a ?crit : > > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:59:27AM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: >

Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-09 Thread Alexandre Martins
Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 15:07:54 Konstantin Belousov a écrit : > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:59:27AM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > I have the save question for the cpu_ipi_pending here: > > > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/x86/x86/mp_x86.c?view=annotate#l1 >

Re: smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-09 Thread Alexandre Martins
I have the save question for the cpu_ipi_pending here: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/x86/x86/mp_x86.c?view=annotate#l1080 Le jeudi 9 mars 2017, 10:43:14 Alexandre Martins a écrit : > Hello, > > I'm curently reading the code of the function smp_rendezvous_action, in >

smp_rendezvous_action: Are atomics correctly used ?

2017-03-09 Thread Alexandre Martins
ot; ? Best regards -- Alexandre Martins STORMSHIELD smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Mbuf leak in if_lagg.c

2015-03-27 Thread Alexandre Martins
; > Hi, > > > > what you thing about this patch? > > lp_detaching can be non zero in case of parent interface departure. > > So I don't see the reason to call ETHER_BPF_MTAP() in this case. > > Now I see the reason - to capture all received packets before interface &

Mbuf leak in if_lagg.c

2015-03-26 Thread Alexandre Martins
ULL without m_freem it. Can you look at this ? Regards -- Alexandre Martins STORMSHIELD smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Possible race in IPv6

2015-03-18 Thread Alexandre Martins
be better to release the reference after the call. What about you? Regards -- Alexandre Martins STORMSHIELD smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Status on igb crash

2014-02-27 Thread Alexandre Martins
Hi Eric, Thank you for the reply. Regards, -- Alexandre Martins NETASQ -- We secure IT Le mercredi 26 février 2014 10:50:48 Eric Joyner a écrit : > Hi Alexandre, > > We didn't put the fix into the repository because we think it would have > had a significant impact on throu

Status on igb crash

2014-02-26 Thread Alexandre Martins
Hi Eric, In January, I have report a bug into igb driver : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2014-January/047827.html You send me a patch, but nothing was done into kernel sources. Will it be planed to put a fix into the repository ? Kind regards -- Alexandre Martins NETASQ

Re: FreeBSD 10-RC4: Got crash in igb driver

2014-01-15 Thread Alexandre Martins
IP/TCP/UDP headers in the first mbuf > > Y> of the chain. > > Y> This looks wrong to me. > > > > Can you please restore the important code in head ASAP? Although crashes > > happen > > > only when the mbuf is last in a page and page isn't mapped, we read > > thrash from > > > next allocation on almost every packet. > > It seems other Intel ethernet drivers except em(4) have similar > issues. I didn't check recent Intel controllers/drivers for long > time so I don't know details on hardware requirements of > offloading. > Since Jack is very responsive and has hardwares to verify, he would > be more appropriate person to handle these issues. > ___ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Alexandre Martins NETASQ -- We secure IT smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

FreeBSD 10-RC4: Got crash in igb driver

2014-01-09 Thread Alexandre Martins
256200, i see that pullups has been removed. May it be related ? Can you confirm the problem ? Best regards -- Alexandre Martins NETASQ -- We secure IT --- sys/dev/e1000/if_igb.c.orig 2014-01-09 16:33:39.0 +0100 +++ sys/dev/e1000/if_igb.c 2014-01-09 16:36:31.0 +0100 @@ -38

Re: Troubles with VIA VX900 chipset

2013-10-24 Thread Alexandre Martins
I forget to attach patches Le jeudi 24 octobre 2013 15:56:15 Alexandre Martins a écrit : > Dear, > > We have seen some issues with the VIA VX900 chipset. The main trouble is > that some SATA hard drive are not seen by the kernel (BIOS and boot-loader > are OK). > > Aft

Troubles with VIA VX900 chipset

2013-10-24 Thread Alexandre Martins
and the call of "ata_generic_reset" and the problem disapear. I also made a more complex fix which check the "BUSY" flag. Which fix of delai checking is the better one ? Best Regards -- Alexandre Martins NETASQ -- We secure IT smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Some question about IPv4 routes

2012-11-05 Thread Alexandre Martins
:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 11 em0 => =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- But not in FreeBSD >= 8 So, why is the broadcast route not created in FreeBSD >= 8 ? And why is the command 'route get 192.168.0.0' fail in FreeBSD >= 8 ? Regards -- Alexandre Martins NETASQ -- We secure IT

Re: Potential deadlock on mbuf

2012-04-03 Thread Alexandre MARTINS
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Andre Oppermann wrote: >> On 02.04.2012 18:21, Alexandre Martins wrote: >>> Dear, >>> >>> I have currently having troubles with a basic socket stress. >>> >>> The socket are setup to use non-blocking I/O. >>&

Potential deadlock on mbuf

2012-04-02 Thread Alexandre Martins
lled with a blocking parameter (M_WAITOK) even if is for a non-blocking socket ? Then, if M_NOWAIT is used, maybe it will be usefull to have an 'ENOMEM' error. Regards -- Alexandre Martins ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list ht

Re: Double free() in libc or gdb ?

2012-03-14 Thread Alexandre Martins
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 20:44:43 you wrote: > On 2012-03-13 11:08, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > On Monday 12 March 2012 18:55:55 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:50:33PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > ... > > >>> I have the libc c

Re: Double free() in libc or gdb ?

2012-03-13 Thread Alexandre Martins
Dear, On Tuesday 13 March 2012 15:18:31 jb wrote: > Alexandre Martins netasq.com> writes: > > ... > > first.c: > > ... > > second.c > > ... > > main.c > > ... > > > > while(42) > > How do you exit that loop ? It&#x

Re: Double free() in libc or gdb ?

2012-03-13 Thread Alexandre Martins
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 13:17:52 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:08:40AM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > On Monday 12 March 2012 18:55:55 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:50:33PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote

Re: Double free() in libc or gdb ?

2012-03-13 Thread Alexandre Martins
On Monday 12 March 2012 18:55:55 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:50:33PM +0100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I'm currently having some trouble with the dynamic loader. > > > > I have the libc compilled with &qu

Double free() in libc or gdb ?

2012-03-12 Thread Alexandre Martins
amp; (1U << bit)) == 0), function arena_run_reg_dalloc, file /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c, line 2543. But when i run the same binary without GDB, no assert. I'm very confused. Can you help me to debug that ? Best regards -- Alexandre Martins NETASQ -- We secure IT

Re: Fwd: OpenSSL 1.0.0d for Freebsd HEAD

2011-03-02 Thread Alexandre Martins
100, Alexandre Martins wrote: > > Dear, > > > > Have you extracted the tarball fo openssl source (1.0.0d) in > > crypto/openssl ? > > Ah, I missed that, the last couple of mails in this thread were only > talking about the patch :) > With the tarball untared it actually

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0d for Freebsd HEAD

2011-03-01 Thread Alexandre Martins
world 7) and install it make installworld 8) welcome to openssl 1.0.0d openssl version I have build successfully FreeBSD for all platfom (make universe) I also checked it on i386 and amd64 platform and no problems was found. Regards, On Tuesday 01 March 2011 10:31:16 Alexandre Martins

Re: Fwd: OpenSSL 1.0.0d for Freebsd HEAD

2011-03-01 Thread Alexandre Martins
nf-sparc64.h > opensslconf.h ( echo "#ifndef MK1MF_BUILD"; echo " /* auto-generated > by crypto/Makefile.ssl for crypto/cversion.c */"; echo " #define > CFLAGS \"cc\""; echo " #define PLATFORM \"FreeBSD-sparc64\""; echo " >

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0d for Freebsd HEAD

2011-02-22 Thread Alexandre Martins
Dears, After several research, i have removed the problematic part. You can find the new version here: http://people.freebsd.org/~fabient/patch-head20110222-openssl1.0.0d Regards, -- Alexandre Martins Research engineer NETASQ On Monday 14 February 2011 17:18:24 Alexandre Martins wrote

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0d for Freebsd HEAD

2011-02-14 Thread Alexandre Martins
Dear, Thank you for your feed-back. I'll look for this issu, and i hope deliver a better patch quickly. Regards, -- Alexandre Martins Research engineer NETASQ On Monday 14 February 2011 16:50:26 Anonymous wrote: > Alexandre Martins writes: > > For those interested in testing,