On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> Hmmm. I just thought of something. Now is the data corrupt still correupt
> on another system? What I mean is did the data get written properly, but
> just isn't being read back from the media correctly. Unless you are
> coping a file larger than
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Lucky Green wrote:
>
> However, the Intel L440gx+ motherboard I have (it came in a VA Linux
> rackmount) seems to have a separate CPU performing all kinds of
> monitoring tasks, watchdog, etc, so I was hoping this separate CPU was
> actually performing the serial console task.
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
> If you're an ohci user can you please test this patch out for inclusion
> in 5.0. I need to know that it doesn't break anything - the reports are
> that it fixes broken ohci :).
I've been running it since you posted the patch a couple of days ago.
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:19:58PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> : > diskless_root_readonly="NO" # Make it "YES" for readonly
> :
> : good.
>
>
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Danny Braniss wrote:
>
> i modified libstand/bootp.c to place all the tags - that dhcp provides - in
> the kernel
> environmet, so that they can be used later - eg in rc.diskless1.
>
> what if:
> we place the rc.conf[.local] there?
> in the dhcpd.conf:
>
The current UHCI driver constructs the bulk transfer queue as a simple
list with a 'terminate' marker on the end. This means that the bulk queue
runs only once per frame period. This is OK for devices with large input
buffers, but in the case of a large transfer to a device with a small
input b
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Darryl Okahata wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> > Also, there are other alternatives to the AirPort (which is closer
> > to $299 than $399). One is the Buffalo AirStation (around $280-$340,
>
> I forgot to mention that the AirStation supposedly supports roaming
> between ac
On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> > However, this isn't really an excuse for issuing ARP with a source address
> > of zero: the initial DHCP exchange is done with broadcasts (so doesn't
> > need ARP), and after that the address is known. The problem presumably
> > arises due to other t
On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, David Holloway wrote:
> I say with 99% certainty that assigning 0.0.0.0 to
> the interface is a requirement of dhcp.
>
> You can't stop using it and expect dhcp to work.
Yes, RFC2131 clause 4.1 says:
DHCP messages broadcast by a client prior to that client obtaining
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> I was also curious about what people do to keep a fleet of FreeBSD machines
> up-to-date with CVSup and buildworld. I can't imagine manually going to
> more than 100 machines and doing the same thing manually... how time consuming.
>
> To summariz
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote:
>
> A typical isic hardware has an ISAC and an HSCX chip onboard. The ISAC
> chip does the D-channel handling and uses offsets 0-0x2b and 0x30-0x3b,
> the HSCX (B-channels) uses offsets 0-0x3b and 0x40-0x73.
But in the case of the teles16.3, it does
On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> Also, when all else fails try booting from a FreeBSD CD. Altneratively
> it may be possible to boot the normal kernel and use a FreeBSD CD as root
> by typing 'boot /kernel -C' (or -c, I forget which).
>
It's -C
Note however that -C is
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :One variable may be available memory. On my system, with default datasize
> :limit of 16M from login.conf, Netscape coredumps very frequently. With
>
> I've been using netscape on a 24bit color system for well over a year
> and have never had
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I really don't understand the problems that everyone is having,
> myself. I've been running netscape (communicator 4.5) in -current for
> ages now and just switched to 4.0 without any problems. My netscape
> still continues to function just fine an
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Christopher Knight wrote:
> At 08:11 PM 1/17/99 +0100, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
>
> >Please try to remove apm0 , if you have ... here it seems to solve the
> >problem (after 15 reboot no problem...)
>
> I didn't have it compiled in. :(
>
> #
> # Laptop support (see LINT
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> We're all seeing this error, not to worry. Happily, it's clearly
> Mark's baby since he both imported the new texinfo *and* does the
> perl5 stuff. :-)
Backing out /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/libperl/config.SH* to 14jan
allowed "make world" to compl
16 matches
Mail list logo
