Re: RockPRO64 exception 22 esr_el1 8a000000

> On 19 May 2022, at 07:26, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > I managed to capture the full console output this time: > > Fatal data abort: > x0:0 > x1:6 > x2:0 > x3:0 > x4:

Re: panic: data abort in critical section or under mutex (was: Re: panic: Unknown kernel exception 0 esr_el1 2000000 (on 14-CURRENT/aarch64 Feb 28))

> On 7 Mar 2022, at 19:04, Mark Johnston wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:03:51AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> >> On 2022-Mar-7, at 08:45, Mark Johnston wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 04:25:22PM +, Andrew Turner wrote: >>

Re: panic: data abort in critical section or under mutex (was: Re: panic: Unknown kernel exception 0 esr_el1 2000000 (on 14-CURRENT/aarch64 Feb 28))

> On 7 Mar 2022, at 15:13, Mark Johnston wrote: > ... > A (the?) problem is that the compiler is treating "pc" as an alias > for x18, but the rmlock code assumes that the pcpu pointer is loaded > once, as it dereferences "pc" outside of the critical section. On > arm64, if a context switch

Re: arm64 panic: reaper-related?

> On 13 Jul 2020, at 15:05, Glen Barber wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 01:58:21PM +, Glen Barber wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This morning, one of our arm64 build machines panicked. It looks like >> it is somehow reaper-related, but I am not entirely sure. Backtrace >> follows. Any thoughts?

Re: The future of ZFS in FreeBSD

;> - Complete additional QA testing at iX >> >> Can you please describe the testing process that will be employed to verify >> the sanity of the ZoL on FreeBSD port? Should other large companies who use >> ZFS on FreeBSD (Panzura?) chime in and the ZFS on FreeBSD communi

Re: Booting UEFI ZFS is broken on arm64

> On 30 Nov 2017, at 00:21, Shawn Webb wrote: > > It appears that in the latest FreeBSD 12-CURRENT/arm64 snapshot, > booting UEFI GPT ZFS on my OverDrive 1000 is broken. It boots up to > this line: > > Using DTB provided by EFI at 0x801fe0. > > Then all output

Re: RFC: Removing hpt* drivers from GENERIC

> On 25 Oct 2017, at 22:43, Colin Percival wrote: > > Hi developers, > > I'd like to remove the hpt* drivers from GENERIC. These are the drivers > for the HighPoint storage hardware -- SATA (hptnr) and RAID (hpt27xx, hptiop, > hptmv, hptrr). > > My reason for wanting to

Re: FYI: FreeBSD-12.0-CURRENT-arm64-aarch64-20170420-r317181.raw under qemu-system-aarch64 on odroid-c2 under UbuntuMate : No valid device tree blob found!

> On 30 Apr 2017, at 12:02, Mark Millard <mar...@dsl-only.net> wrote: > > On 2017-Apr-30, at 1:57 AM, Andrew Turner wrote: > >>> On 30 Apr 2017, at 04:29, Mark Millard wrote: >>> ... >>> acpi0: >>> acpi0: Power Button (fixed) >>>

Re: FYI: FreeBSD-12.0-CURRENT-arm64-aarch64-20170420-r317181.raw under qemu-system-aarch64 on odroid-c2 under UbuntuMate : No valid device tree blob found!

> On 30 Apr 2017, at 04:29, Mark Millard wrote: > ... > acpi0: > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > acpi0: Sleep Button (fixed) ACPI is not fully supported on arm64. Andrew ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: EFI boot: can we make loader.efi work as BOOT{x64, aa64, arm, ia32}.efi?

On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 23:20:55 -0700 Xin Li wrote: > Hi, > > I finally got some time to explore the UEFI boot process (kudos to > everyone who made this work!) and getting myself familiarize with the > basics. > > One quick question -- Is there some technical restriction

Re: r294248: boot stuck: EFI loader doesn't proceed

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:10:33 +0100 Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 18 Jan 2016, at 07:20, O. Hartmann > wrote: > > Building NanoBSD images booting off from USB Flash drives and > > having two GPT partitions, booting is stuck in the UEFI loader, > >

Re: r294248: boot stuck: EFI loader doesn't proceed

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 22:46:18 + Steven Hartland <ste...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: > On 18/01/2016 21:57, Ed Maste wrote: > > On 18 January 2016 at 15:26, Andrew Turner <and...@fubar.geek.nz> > > wrote: > >> the issue was we were caching reads from the firs

Re: r294248: boot stuck: EFI loader doesn't proceed

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:04:38 + Steven Hartland <ste...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: > On 18/01/2016 11:34, Andrew Turner wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:10:33 +0100 > > Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> On 18 Jan 2016, at 07:20

Re: System-On-Module

On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:27:08 +0900 Lundberg, Johannes johan...@brilliantservice.co.jp wrote: What I'm most worried about is the graphics stack.. Some companies don't seem so keen on handing out specs. The only ARM vendor I know that has released documentation on their 3D hardware is Broadcom

Floating-point review

I'm looking for someone who known more about floating-point than I do to review one of me changes. The change in question adds 6 new functions to the ARM libc to perform floating-point comparisons. These functions are required as part of the ABI spec. The review is at [1]. I am mostly interested

Re: -ffunction-sections, -fdata-sections and -Wl,--gc-sections

On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 19:30:01 -0700 Tim Kientzle kient...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sep 15, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote: GCC and Clang support the -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections flags. Essentially, these flags force the compiler to put every function and

ARM pcpu changes, was Re: [patch] i386 pmap sysmaps_pcpu[] atomic access

On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:47:47 +0100 Olivier Houchard cog...@ci0.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 07:09:20PM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote: On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:43:49 -0500 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:53:52 am Svatopluk Kraus wrote: On Wed

Re: [patch] i386 pmap sysmaps_pcpu[] atomic access

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:43:49 -0500 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:53:52 am Svatopluk Kraus wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:22 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 7:31:08 am Svatopluk Kraus wrote: On Tue, Feb

Re: FreeBSD/armv6z/clang on Raspberry Pi 512MB (with U-Boot + ubldr)

On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:08:50 +0900 Daisuke Aoyama aoy...@peach.ne.jp wrote: Hi, I've created FreeBSD clang world for RPI based on svn 244112 + eabi.diff(NOT USE) + few NetBSD code. I didn't test with -mfloat-abi=softfp but it might work. If you haven't seen there is the start of FreeBSD ARM

Re: make tinderbox failures

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:31:50 -0700 m...@freebsd.org wrote: Thanks for fixes! Is the reason the public tinderbox didn't see these because it has explicit lists of arch/CONF kernels to build, while make tinderbox on my machine just builds all the capitalized files as configuration files? I

Re: Warning with loader Makefile?

Nate Lawson wrote: I get this: === i386/cdboot === i386/kgzldr === i386/libi386 === i386/loader /usr/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk, line 38: warning: duplicate script for target loader ignored cc -nostdlib -static -Ttext 0x0 -o loader.sym /home/obj/home/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/../btx/lib/crt0.o main.o

Re: WARNING: Re: Kernel option dependency finding

Try this then: #!/bin/sh #Default options LINTCONF=LINT.CONF LINTCONF1=LINT.CONF1 ARCH=`uname -m` ARCH1=$ARCH SRCDIR=/sys START=0 END=0 NOCLEAN=0 TMPDIR=/tmp/makedepend WD=`pwd` #Read the command line while [ $# -ne 0 ] do case $1 in --src-dir)

Kernel option dependency finding

Hello, Find attached a script I have started writing to find option dependency from the NOTES files. Would other developers please test this script and submit suggestions back to me (on or off the list). Andrew Turner find_dependcy Description: application/java-applet