or not. The damage
> is already done.
>
> On the other hand, increasing the size of the variable eliminates
> the problem entirely. And once you do that, the overflow test is
> unnecessary.
>
> John
So what about those i586/pentium machines? Do they have the 32bit counters so
you can implement the higher bit counts?
Chas
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Suggestion:
How bout a version detection flag for the update pkgs and a version
requirement to the newly built ports?
C~P
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Tom Bartol wrote:
> >ports/package database system but it occurred to me that perhaps the
> >database is currently only storing which packages a given
Now that sounz like a simple solution.:)) Paul...
> > Unless someone comes up with a scheme that tracks set membership and
> > allows us to add to that set, I think that we should stick to
> > the "simple"
> > approach.
> >
> > /etc/defaults/rc.conf defines ${rc_conf_files} to be "/etc/rc.conf"
>
subscribe freebsd-current
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
