Re: floppy install troubles

2003-11-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:10:34PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: At Wed, 12 Nov 2003 03:48:01 + (UTC), Peter Schultz wrote: I'm having trouble installing with the 5.1-CURRENT-20031110-JPSNAP floppies I got off snapshots.jp.freebsd.org. First off, I tried to create a new slice and it

Re: sysinstall fails

2003-11-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:37:03AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've made fresh (2003) release from HEAD. During installation, sysinstall has troubles creating filesystems. 1). fdisk creates slice with name ad0p1. and newfs can't find

Re: More ULE bugs fixed.

2003-11-03 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:33:48AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: I think the existence of rtprio and a non-broken idprio makes infinite deprioritization using niceness unnecessary. (idprio is still broken (not available to users) in -current, but it doesn't need to be if priority propagation is

Re: Dualbooting STABLE CURRENT

2003-11-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 01:26:10PM -0800, Steve Wingate wrote: STABLE taking the entire first disk (works fine) CURRENT taking the first 1/3 of the second disk and backup data taking the remaining 2/3 of the second disk. I have installed CURRENT (at least 8 times) but I cannot get it to

Re: HEADSUP: MPSAFE network drivers

2003-10-30 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 11:52:48AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: The following drivers are marked MPSAFE: ath, em, ep, fxp, sn, wi, sis I've got changes coming for bge. Other drivers probably can be marked MPSAFE but I'm only doing it for those drivers that I can test. Donations@ can

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 06:58:52PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: First of all, the Partition Editor has the 'A' option to use all of the available HDD space. It creates a DOS-compatible slice (starting at sector 63 and ending on cylinder boundary). This is completely useless on servers and

Re: 5.1 - stl Kernel compile fails

2003-10-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:11:53AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected soon? Is this an ISA

Re: 5.1 - stl Kernel compile fails

2003-10-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected soon? Is this an ISA or PCI card? ___ [EMAIL

Re: newfs by fstab directory name?

2003-10-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:26:23PM -0800, Wes Peters wrote: At work we do a lot of dynamic filesystem creation, so we added the ability to specify the 'special file' argument to newfs via the fstab mount point directory. Please see the attached patch. If nobody objects, I'll commit this

Re: warnings while kernel build

2003-10-23 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:41:58PM +0400, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: ? ??, 23.10.2003, ? 02:13, Doug White ?: On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: While build kernel on RELENG_4 machine I have following warnings (they prevent success build unless -Werror

Re: success (Re: USB problem: /dev/ugen* dynamically auto-reconfigures to root:operator 644, so non-root user unable to access USB devices even if wanted)

2003-10-20 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:40:00PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Hint: here again we seem to be missing a manpage: devfs.rules(5). In /etc/rc.subr you see for example a reference to this manpage, but it doesn't exist. I'm sure we'd be more than happy to see somebody (hint hint!) send

Re: this /rescue thing

2003-10-20 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:55:57AM +0200, C. Kukulies wrote: === rescue/rescue install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 rescue /rescue install -o root -g wheel -m 555 nextboot_FIXED /rescue/nextboot.sh install: /rescue/nextboot.sh: Not a directory *** Error code 71 Stop in

Re: bikeshed

2003-09-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:02:03AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you ever consider that your doing exactly what phk's logo protests? ;) Maybe that is why phk hasn't responded any further, because he's laughing at you! You have to admit that is just a bit ironic. Actually looks more like

Re: Quo vadis, -CURRENT? (recent changes to cc compatibility)

2003-09-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:41:41PM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote: gnome2 depends on gnomemedia2. gnomemedia2 depends on gstreamer-plugins. gstreamer-plugins fails because ARTSD_FLAGS in several dozen Makefiles includes -pthread. This is being worked on from the compiler stand point.

Re: Quo vadis, -CURRENT? (recent changes to cc compatibility)

2003-09-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:56:45AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: 4.9 and 5.0-R are independent branch. By your logic we should wait to 4.10 or 4.11 or 4.12 or ... before any substantial change can be made to -CURRENT. The point is that is isn't wise to commit a change like the -pthread

Re: config(8) KERNEL setting

2003-09-04 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:22:09PM -0700, Doug White wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote: however kern.post.mk only uses KERNEL_KO, so even though config(8) has set KERNEL for me, that name only gets used for the boot directory. There doesn't seem to be any way of getting

Re: /lib/foo.so.X - /usr/lib/foo.so

2003-09-04 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:27:15PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:58:39PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: [...] The patch is not a problem (attached). I've been looking at how our friends do this. NetBSD has symlinks in /usr/lib to /lib, both to .so and .so.X, and

Re: ACPI errors on my desktop PC (floppy not found)

2003-09-04 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:30:49PM +0200, Martin wrote: I have more problems to report with the ACPI support and will submit a PR, if you want. I don't know when this got broken. ... As you can see I recompiled today to confirm that the problem still exists. This is only about floppy.

Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-09-04 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: Sorry, I missed this when I did my scrub yesterday. I'll fix it now. Btw, does X work on it? Can I compile/install it without hassle? Yes. It installs Just Fine. You wont even notice the difference relative to an i386 machine.

Re: automated clean up of /usr/lib because of /lib

2003-09-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 08:31:49PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: shouldn't we add something like ---snip--- for i in /lib/lib*.so.*; do lib=$(basename $i) [ -f /usr/lib/$lib ] chflags noschg /usr/lib/$lib rm /usr/lib/$lib done ---snip--- into UPDATING or append it to the

Re: /lib symlinks problem?

2003-09-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 05:52:24PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: I might be missing an obvious, but I just don't see a reason why we should use relative linking here: we should just link to where we really install. With the attached patch, I get: ... +.if ${LIBDIR} != ${SHLIBDIR} +

Re: /lib symlinks problem?

2003-09-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:44:24AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 10:10:49PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 05:52:24PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: I might be missing an obvious, but I just don't see a reason why we should use relative

Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-09-01 Thread David O'Brien
| | Tier-1 Support for | In| Peter Wemm, | mode, and boots to | | AMD64 Hammer| progress | David O'Brien | single-user in | | | | | 64-bit mode. We| | | | | expect

Re: buildworld failure

2003-08-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:36:46PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: I think the impact is more social. People will try to compile world and get failures. Specially people coming from the 4.x branch, where this sort of think never occurred. If this is the only thing preventing a clean makeworld

Re: buildworld failure

2003-08-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:04:54PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: Isn't pentium4 a known-broken optimization at the moment? No, not since GCC 3.2.x. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To

Re: IDE DVD playback on 5.1-CURRENT

2003-08-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:10:46AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: David O'Brien wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:29:22AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: 1)dd if=/dev/acd0 count=1 of=/dev/null 2)dd if=/dev/acd0c count=1 of=/dev/null 3)dd if=/dev/acd0a count=1 of=/dev/null

Re: __fpclassifyd

2003-08-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:23:48PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:54:37 +0200 Christoph Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did a cvsup and rebuild of world and ports, portupgrade, reinstalled mod_php4, apache and still get this sh apache.sh start Syntax

Re: IDE DVD playback on 5.1-CURRENT

2003-08-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:29:22AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: 1)dd if=/dev/acd0 count=1 of=/dev/null 2)dd if=/dev/acd0c count=1 of=/dev/null 3)dd if=/dev/acd0a count=1 of=/dev/null

Re: HTT on current

2003-08-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:27:46AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: Since HTT can lead to performance degradation in some (many?) cases, the second logical CPU's are halted by default. They are enabled, however, in order for interrupt routing to work right. Work is ongoing to make an HTT-aware

Re: HTT on current

2003-08-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:14:18PM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: I've heard this several times and don't doubt it, but it would be nice to know more about the issue. What type of cases? What benchmarks have been run showing this? Well, I haven't actually seen any case where there was a

Re: HEADS UP! ATAng committed

2003-08-24 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:27:05AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes. Does ATAng still kill various Seagate drives? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC 3.3.1-RELEASE is coming

2003-08-24 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 06:59:20PM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote: Trying to consider how to best pull important differences back into the FSF tree. Will this be true for all FreeBSD systems going forward? %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1}} ---

Re: ACPI on Tyan Motherboard

2003-08-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:26:17PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Have you tried to hold the power-button a little bit longer? My power-button turn the system off when I pres it for ~4secs (but I haven't a Tyan board). Sorry but telling experiences with non-Tyan boards don't help one bit.

Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:36:40PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: I think this is a bad idea because all of the .a archives will end up in /lib. Seeing how those aren't necessary for running binaries in /bin and /sbin, I'd rather they stay in /usr/lib (which means LIBDIR shouldn't change if I'm

Re: CPUTYPE considered harmful? (was: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV)

2003-08-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:07:04AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: I think he is right, because when upgrading host where was gcc3.2 to current -CURRENT (with gcc3.3) 'make world' builds make(1) in first place and it is builded by gcc3.2 with CPUTYPE=p4, so it will be broken. So gcc have to be

Re: ACPI on Tyan Motherboard

2003-08-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:16:32PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Feel free to point out, that Tyan boards don't turn the system off, even when you hold the power-button longer than 10 seconds. I'm not reluctant to learn something new. My K7 Thunder S2462 doesn't turn off no matter how

Re: ACPI on Tyan Motherboard

2003-08-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:58:22PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:54:21AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: Sorry but telling experiences with non-Tyan boards don't help one bit. (too bad I don't have Bill Paul's finesse in getting this point across) Actually, yes it does

Re: gcc 3.3.1 ICE building R-letter

2003-08-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 02:15:03PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: I see an ICE building the math/R-letter port on -current (x86) from late last week. % gcc -v Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.3.1 [FreeBSD] 20030711

Re: ACPI on Tyan Motherboard

2003-08-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 06:13:19PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Following up your suggestion that it is a hardware problem, I decided to try updating the BIOS from version 2.10 to 2.14. Now start up produces lots of ACPI error messages. ... The 2.10 is the version of the PCI BIOS

Re: ACPI on Tyan Motherboard

2003-08-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 08:55:10PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Following up your suggestion that it is a hardware problem, I decided to try updating the BIOS from version 2.10 to 2.14. Now start up produces lots of ACPI error messages. ... The 2.10 is the version of the PCI BIOS

Re: What is the actual status of Audigy2 support in 5.1-CURRENT?

2003-08-18 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 11:08:07AM -0400, Tom Parquette wrote: I would like to get an Audigy2 Platnum card working on my AMD dual processor system. I'm 5.1-CURRENT but I tend to hang back a little. I have device pcm and device sbc in the kernel. When the system didn't figure out the card I

Re: What is the actual status of Audigy2 support in 5.1-CURRENT?

2003-08-18 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 09:47:00PM +0200, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: On Monday 18 August 2003 18:37, David O'Brien wrote: snip I use this uncommitted patch (I haven't been able to test it against older SB Live! 128 cards): snip On http://chibis.persons.gfk.ru/audigy/, Yuriy Tsibizov claims

Re: RFC: Allow non-root users to use make distribution and makeinstallworld?

2003-08-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:58:51PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: The question now is, should I provide patches to make this work. Do we actually want this to work? Or is anybody trying to run installworld as non-user doing something completely stupid? I've committed the obivously correct

Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 01:54:38AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: I just got through with my commit spree to enable users to build /bin and /sbin dynamically linked. To do this required a fair amount of tweaking and moving around libraries and such dangerous equipment as I think this is a more

Re: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV

2003-08-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:54:43PM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: Stefan, This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before posting. At this moment in time, 'p4' isn't a safe CPUTYPE (It produces broken code). 'p3' or 'i686' are what's recommended for Pentium 4s.

Re: when should 5.x be stable enough for web servers

2003-08-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:10:38PM -0400, Eriq Lamar wrote: On i386 hardware and two processors amd mp. should I wait for 5.2. (*shrug*) some people are already using it. It is very stable for most people now, but if you run into a bug, it is probably a show-stopper type. If you have multiple

Re: Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 Problems

2003-08-15 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:36:01PM -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote: You can get firmware and drivers for these drives from Hitachi: http://www.hgst.com/support/ Specifically where? I can't find any firmware there. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: INET6 in world

2003-08-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:08:23PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: That's chicken/egg - IPv6 never will be widely used if everyone thinks that way. The sense is to break this dependency loop by ecouraging everyone to use it and not to make it easier to completely disable the support. As I said:

Re: driver maintainers, please help

2003-08-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:11:35PM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote: this is a call for help from the various driver maintainers. In a recent discussion on -doc it has come out that several manpages are not in sync with what's listed in the 5.1 Hardware Notes, We also have several drivers in 5.1 that

Re: Best Known Methods for dual booting WinXP + -current

2003-08-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:40:27PM -0500, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote: Had to use FFS filesystem since Grub doesn't support UFS. ^^^ UFS1 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: make rerelease broken?

2003-07-31 Thread David O'Brien
[ Reply-to: set back to list ] On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:50:24PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: There is something dodgy with the crunchgen stuff that leaves behind .o files compiled with the wrong -DFOO defines. Result is things that don't link properly much later. Correct. Our

Re: Floppyless release build of sparc64

2003-07-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:50:10PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: boot.flp is actually useful on sparc64 because you can dd it to a disk from solaris and then boot off it to install. I'm happy with having the option of not building it if it saves time but please make it an option.

Re: make release broken [FIX]

2003-07-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:26:34PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On 22-Jul-2003 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Hi! As many of you probably know, recent telnet commit broke snapshot building. Since I needed a working make release to go on with my task on floppy-less make release (for AMD64,

Re: Floppyless release build of sparc64

2003-07-24 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 07:07:30PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:57:58AM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote: Apparently, On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:16:43AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov said words to the effect of; A similar change would be in order for sparc64. Patch

Re: src/bin/ed/re.c: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a globaldeclaration

2003-07-21 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:59:43AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Jun Kuriyama wrote: JKWith new gcc and -Wshadow, src/bin/ed/re.c shows this warning: JK JKcc -Wshadow -c re.c JKre.c: In function `get_compiled_pattern': JKre.c:44: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a

Re: Buildworld fails in 5.1

2003-07-21 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:46:03AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: Gordon Tetlow wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:36:37AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: Hmmm... Is that what .ORDER is for? To work around a parallel make that gratuitously rebuilds things? Right it serializes build dependencies.

Re: Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS (after -current update with newgcc)

2003-07-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:07:40AM +0200, Karel J. Bosschaart wrote: FWIW, the new behaviour of vim is caused by patch 6.2.015. I added 015 to BADPATCHES in the ports Makefile and reinstalled. gvim works as usual now. I'm willing to commit it as such, but I'd like to hear more people's

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-07-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:00:17PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: It's not a machine problem if it only happens to the sparc64 build - the same machine runs all the other -CURRENT tinderboxen except powerpc. BTW, PowerPC should be cross buildable now w/o needing a GCC patch. -- -- David

Re: Annoucning DragonFly BSD!

2003-07-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 05:14:05PM +0200, Julian Stacey wrote: Hmm, typing this command a second time I nopw see extra info: Registrant: Matthew Dillon 41 Vicente Rd Berkeley, CA 94705 US I've been to Matt's house before -- its real. He does have a T-1 at home. -- -- David

Re: problem after gcc import

2003-07-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:12:24PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: I use gvim as my editor-of-choice for programming in C, and now this happens: kaoru:~: gvim Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS Vim: Finished. ... Any ideas? Read freebsd-current. :-) A suggestion was given this week: Subject:

Re: src/bin/ed/re.c: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a globaldeclaration

2003-07-15 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:59:43AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: I would call this a compiler bug. It shouldn't declare exp(3) when you don't include math.h. As I understand the standard the names in math.h are only reserved when you include math.h. I remember that an earlier version of gcc had

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

2003-07-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: It appears /rescue is cleaning for way too much as part of buildworld. For instance, groff is NOT part of /rescue (or we have other things to discuss. :) This adds a bit of time to buildworld, can it be removed? Gordon, 'make world'

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

2003-07-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:09:52AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:40:42AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: It appears /rescue is cleaning for way too much as part of buildworld. For instance, groff is NOT part

Re: GDB - do we dare?

2003-07-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 01:05:00PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:50:02 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gang, With the gcc(1) dust not even settled yet, I like to get some feedback on gdb(1). AFAICT, this is the deal: o Both ia64

Re: GDB - do we dare?

2003-07-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 05:57:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:39:30 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 01:05:00PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: o We still have the Alpha gdb -k bug moved over from the 5.1

Re: GDB - do we dare?

2003-07-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 02:28:08PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: FSF GDB releases use a libbfd that's basically a snapshot taken at the point where the release branch was cut. Hmm, seems like a motivation for a libbfd port that tracks the snapshot, for this very reason. NO! -- -- David

Re: 5.1 missing /dev/nrsa0 ?

2003-07-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:02:26AM +0200, Karl M. Joch wrote: i have 2 compaq DLT tapes installed on an adaptec controller. dmesg shows me sa0 and sa1 and mt erase and mt offline can access sa0 and sa1. i found that MAKEDEV is no longer supported and the devices are created on demand. but

Re: Panic at boot time on SMP

2003-07-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:56:02AM +, Daniel Flickinger wrote: I have not been able to boot a kernel since 13 Jun; my Tyan 2642 with SMP, AMD 1.2s, and SCSI only gets as far as: What versions of the BIOS? I have 2 of these systems and both boot a June 30th kernel just fine.

Re: Disk/FS I/O issues in -CURRENT

2003-07-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 03:30:06PM -0500, Alan L. Cox wrote: I've been able to reproduce what I believe is the problem. (In my case, I reset my machine and watched the background fsck slowly grind to a halt. Foreground fsck is fine.) The problem actually appears to be in vm_page_alloc(),

Re: rescue/ broke cross compiles

2003-07-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 05:35:16PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: Build tools are most of the time so small or trivial (gcc is probably the exception, before that perl probably was) that building them again is lost in creating the rescue bits itself. Please no, don't pessimize the build even

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:20:04PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Paul) writes: : P.S.: Be sure to join us next time when I ream out whoever it was that : broke support for my 3Com 3c575C cardbus ethernet NIC. It looks

Re: audigy 2

2003-06-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:09:39AM -0700, Greg J. wrote: Yuriy Tsibizov wrote: Old driver (emu10k1.c) was too big for me to work on it and was difficult to add MIDI support. I know that my driver will never go into the tree - sound@ decided to use Orlando Bassotto's work. His driver is

Re: audigy 2

2003-06-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:39:09AM +0400, Yuriy Tsibizov wrote: My PCM-only driver is commitable. Diff to emu10k1.c in -current is small and clear (at least to me). It's stable enought to be commited. But it will not be commited because sound@ decided to use another driver that is better than

Re: Problem with wi in CURRENT (and 5.1)

2003-06-23 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:48:13AM +0100, Robert Hulme wrote: I'm having some problems with wi in 5-CURRENT and 5.1 in general. I'm using a Proxim Skyline 802.11b PC Card (which I believe uses the Prism 2 chipset). The PC Card is using the 0.3.0 primary and 0.8.3 secondary firmware (which I

Re: Audigy Support?

2003-06-22 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:28:55PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:19:42PM -0400, John Wilson wrote: I've been using the OSS drivers for my Audigy Gamer sound card for quite some time now, and would like to switch away from OSS. I vaguely remember, after searching

Re: audigy 2

2003-06-22 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:55:18AM +0400, Yuriy Tsibizov wrote: From: Andro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: audigy 2 it?s just another question about audigy 2! does someone have audigy 2 working well in freebsd?? i

Re: Bulding libc.so with gnu99 is dangerous!

2003-06-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:40:53PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: After installing libc.so builded with standard bsd.sys.mk (i.e. with gnu99) all shared programs reports missing 'SYS_sigreturn' name and fails to start. When I restore old libc and rebuild libc without gnu99, all works fine

Re: Bulding libc.so with gnu99 is dangerous!

2003-06-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:51:28PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:44:27 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:40:53PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: After installing libc.so builded with standard bsd.sys.mk (i.e. with gnu99) all shared programs

Re: CSTD=c99 breaks package creation

2003-06-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 07:37:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:38:58AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: A couple of ports are creating broken bzip2 archives since I updated the build environments to 5.1-CURRENT: ... Backing out the recent changes to bsd.sys.mk fixed

Re: Duplicate keys in CVSROOT/modules

2003-06-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:40:51AM +0200, Michael L. Hostbaek wrote: Cejka Rudolf (cejkar) writes: Is it possible to fix them? I sent a mail to the CVS repository Meisters yesterday, so it's just a matter of time before it will be fixed. Any committer can fix this -- just check

Re: adsl/pppoe no longer connecting on 5.1

2003-06-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:32:30PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: alloca() is not being inlined when -std is specified. It is possible there's a bug in the libc implementation. I'm also suspicious that some of the ppp data structures have changed size or alignment which could be confusing

Re: wireless lan problem

2003-06-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:41:04PM +0200, Gerald Mixa wrote: ihave got a i386 Laptop and have installed FreeBSD5.1 today, before I had 5.0. Now I do have the following problem: when I want to install my elsa MC11 wireless pcmcia card and I do ifconfig wi0 inet 192.168.0.X wi_cmd:

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: The compiler in 4.7 does not like this: -std=gnu99 As a result, buildworld of -CURRENT fails rather early. Committers are not required to support building 5-CURRENT, post 5.0-RELEASE on a 4.7 machine. So this is not

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 12:08:31AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:57:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: The compiler in 4.7 does not like this: -std=gnu99 As a result, buildworld of -CURRENT

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 06:30:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:57:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: : On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: : The compiler

Re: rcNG automonter(amd)

2003-06-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 09:04:46AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 15:48:47 +0300 Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: context I have a problem with /etc/rc.d/amd, because of the line command_args= [amd] gets run in the background, ldconfig failes to cache

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:38:15AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: Index: usr.bin/xlint/lint1/cgram.y === RCS file: /usr/src/cvs/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/cgram.y,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.7 cgram.y ---

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:38:15AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: Index: Makefile.inc1 === RCS file: /usr/src/cvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v retrieving revision 1.363 diff -u -r1.363 Makefile.inc1 --- Makefile.inc1 31 May 2003 21:29:38

Re: Audigy Support?

2003-06-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:19:42PM -0400, John Wilson wrote: I've been using the OSS drivers for my Audigy Gamer sound card for quite some time now, and would like to switch away from OSS. I vaguely remember, after searching Google, that someone had gotten this to work after a recent cvsup.

Re: i386-undermydesk-freebsd?

2003-06-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 07:05:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What does i386-undermydesk-freebsd refer to? What is it used for? Is there an i386-inthedrawer-freebsd, or i386-intheXbox-freebsd? It is an in-side joke by some FreeBSD developers, that we keep alive on the 5-CURRENT branch. It

Re: Remove absolute symlink in $MAKEOBJDIR

2003-06-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 02:13:55PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: In usual buildworld, we have absolute symbolic links in $MAKEOBJDIR. This causes built $MAKEOBJDIR can use to install the world on other boxen only if same /usr/src (or etc.) location and same $MAKEOBJDIR. I'm using this patch

Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

2003-05-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:43:15AM -0500, David Leimbach wrote: However the idea is that all GPL infected stuff be isolated, allowing a fully working kernel without GPL stuff in there. Sounds like a kernel module is the way to go then. Perhaps it could exist in the ports tree instead of the

Re: Panic on fxp

2003-04-03 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:10:04PM -0500, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: # ls -ltr /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/ total 116 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 21318 Oct 25 2001 rcvbundl.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8190 Apr 2 13:00 if_fxpvar.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 73326 Apr 3 11:46 if_fxp.c -rw-r--r--

Re: FreeBSD/alpha kern.flp flood

2003-04-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:44:39PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Most of the savings from stripping commits is from removing verbose compiler id GCC: (GNU) 3.2.1 [FreeBSD] 20021119 (release). ... David, can we get rid of the .comment section for the normal builds too, or at least not put

Re: Removing Sendmail

2003-04-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 06:01:01PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: The problem I see with that is, that even a minimalistic base install installs things like sendmail, ppp, atm-stuff, g77 and so on. I would love to see the toolchain broken out into its own tarball like NetBSD. It isn't a simple

Re: FreeBSD/alpha kern.flp flood

2003-04-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 01:56:52PM -0600, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-04-01 ] [ Subjecte: Re: FreeBSD/alpha kern.flp flood ] On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 06:03:48PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Anyway, I've committed the fix to release/Makefile

Re: Do we want to let cpp(1) hide warnings in system headers?

2003-03-30 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 09:09:18AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 03:19:05PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:08:54PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Sigh. It's been a while since I've fixed the feature of gcc(1) that makes it hide warnings

Re: FreeBSD/alpha kern.flp flood

2003-03-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 07:09:08PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: It seems that kern.flp for FreeBSD/alpha is flooded (tested on FreeBSD/i386). Maybe several kbytes should be removed from the kernel: image.kern/boot: total 210 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 764 Mar 28 00:57 device.hints

Re: Do we want to let cpp(1) hide warnings in system headers?

2003-03-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:08:54PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Sigh. It's been a while since I've fixed the feature of gcc(1) that makes it hide warnings in system headers (but visible with -nostdinc -I/usr/include). What is the difference in output from make buildworld?

Re: optimization/10189: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for__ieee754_pow(double x, double y)

2003-03-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:09:34PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: And trust me, as long as gcc ships with a description of other optimizations beneath -O there will be (clueless or smart... does it really matter here?) people which will try those optimizations on everything Not to mention

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >