On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:08:54PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Sigh. It's been a while since I've fixed the "feature" of gcc(1)
> that makes it hide warnings in system headers (but visible with
> -nostdinc -I/usr/include).
What is the difference in output from "make buildworld"?
__
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 07:09:08PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
>
> It seems that kern.flp for FreeBSD/alpha is flooded (tested on FreeBSD/i386).
> Maybe several kbytes should be removed from the kernel:
> image.kern/boot:
> total 210
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 764 Mar 28 00:57 device.hint
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:09:34PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> And trust me, as long as gcc ships with a description of other
> optimizations beneath "-O" there will be (clueless or smart... does it
> really matter here?) people which will try those optimizations on
> everything
Not to men
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 01:01:18PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Synopsis: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for __ieee754_pow(double x, double y)
Beautiful email!!
> Special secret #2: Although the FSF-side does want to improve all
> code generation (and I think proper PRs RE CPU swit
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 05:42:59AM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
> Thus spake David Leimbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Or even better would be just building libc. I have been working on my
> > getpwnam_r assignment...
> > examining implementations in both Darwin and NetBSD and started trying
> > to
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:21:13AM +, RMH wrote:
> I have to note that currently it isn't really possible to compile
> -CURRENT by GCC 2.95.x in the way it has to be. Buildkernel is
> broken in several places by different means, however GCC 3.2.x
> passes them successfully, even with no warning
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:43:19PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:11:12AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:28:34AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> > > +kldxref_start () {
> > > + if [ -z "$kldxref_module_path&
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:28:34AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> +kldxref_start () {
> + if [ -z "$kldxref_module_path" ]; then
> + MODULE_PATHS=`sysctl -n kern.module_path`
> + else
> + MODULE_PATHS="$kldxref_module_path"
> + fi
Please change the logic to posi
> > Are you trying to compile the -stable version of gcc? We make significant
> > modifications to integrate it within our environment. I would not at all
> > be suprised if the -stable version of gcc doesn't build on -current.
...
> > You are aware that there are gcc ports set up to configure th
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:32:02PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:14:25PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> >
> > I need to install current on a new box that just arrived.
> > What's the latest working snapshot?
> >
> > 20030312-JPSNAP get about 40% of the way through t
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 04:03:49AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > Here are two patches. The first fixes missing pieces in /sys/conf/files
> > > and /sys/conf/options, the second fixes all the files that need it in
> > > /sys/netns/.
> >
> > You seem
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:08:04AM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> Now, that OpenWatcom is released, the FreeBSd port of it should follow.
> And maybe someone will try to compile the kernel and world with it.
I hate to be the skeptic, but looking at OpenWatcom 1.0, it only produces
dos and win32 bin
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:27:19PM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
> Well, finally got a kernel to boot on a 16MHz 386SX (suicidal is an
> understatement!) - will this do?
Can you post the /var/run/dmesg.boot?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:31:20PM -0500, Bryan Liesner wrote:
> I have seen this as well, using -O2 -march=athlon-xp.
> The generated assembler tried to stuff -129 into a single byte.
What about just trying -march=athlon? The only difference is the SSE
support, which is quite new and may have la
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:09:11PM +0600, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
> Is there any support of nVidia's nForce2 integrated LAN
> controller?
> Also I have following message during device probe:
> pcm0: measured ac97 link rate at 292571428 Hz
Should be -- I committed some support for it.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 02:49:52PM -0600, David Syphers wrote:
> fails. (Am I correct in assuming a 5.0-R install defaults to UFS2?)
You are not correct. 5.0-R, and infact 5-CURRENT still default to ufs1.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bo
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:11:49PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> In the case where an application is OPIEised and not PAMised, we
> need to figure out something; PAMizing such apps is not terribly
> hard. If any of them are in the base system, then this situation
> is a bug in its own right. If they
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 03:48:20PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" writes:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 12:06:36 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Admins with no /etc/opieaccess AFFECTED!
> > >
> > > Admins with no /etc/o
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:29:21PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
>
> It seems that our kenrel for kern.flp does not fit again :-(
Why oh why, doesn't the tenderbox do "make release" instead of just "make
buildworld"???
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cu
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:55:49PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Don't cross post current and developers.
> >
> > The developers charter says it's for internal management i.e. how we
> > manage the project and not for discussing code issues. It's badly named,
> > we should have called it someth
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:30:09AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > It is becoming increasingly clear to me that the majority of FreeBSD
> > developers don't really care if their code works, as long as they get
> > the credit (and / or paycheck) for committing it.
>
> I think that's unnecessa
What is the use of
options FB_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev
for in 5-CURRENT?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:33:41PM -0600, David Leimbach wrote:
> I am about to try to make some changes to FreeBSD current...
>
> Should I begin to use read-only CVS instead of CVSup for this work or
> is it possible to generate diffs based on CVSup'd sources?
For light duty usage (esp. on a RE
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:14:30PM +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> Nothing against 'booteasy', it does the job - but it looks ugly :-)
If that is the only reason to use grub, try osbsbeta.exe that is in the
tools directory of your CDROM or ftp.freebsd.org.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM
cc -pipe -O -march=athlon -D_IEEE_LIBM -D_ARCH_INDIRECT=i387_ -c
/FBSD/src/lib/msun/src/e_gammaf_r.c -o e_gammaf_r.o
In file included from /FBSD/obj/FBSD/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/openssl/e_os2.h:56,
from /FBSD/obj/FBSD/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/openssl/symhacks.h:58,
The problem with this fix is it depends on a FreeBSD'ism -- "__unused".
One must be able to take a generated parser and run it on non-FreeBSD
systems. -Dlint really should be the way to avoid this warning.
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:24:10PM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> We are having minor problems w
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:24:10PM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> We are having minor problems with a newer gcc generating warnings
> for yacc due to yyrcsid not being used. Does anyone object to the
> following patch to skeleton.c or have a better way of handling this?
> -Dlint causes other problems.
[From address modified because I don't want every message in this
thread to end up in my personal mailbox. I'll read them in the
list, thank you very much.]
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 09:23:43PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> Bakul Shah writes:
> > > Since you keep talking about random(), I must conclu
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 03:49:49PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> David,
>
> Are you still the gcc guy?
Well... uh... I guess I'm still one of them.
> I was scanning the GCC mailing list
> and it appears that a gcc 3.2.2 will be released with only bug
> and regression fixes. Are there any FreeB
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:46:47PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> I would not introduce a , but rather
> . The reason for this is that the
> /usr/include/platform directory is only needed on powerpc and mips,
> which seems to indicate that it should be under . Also,
> the use of machine/${variant
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:37:16PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> I've made a note that you don't think my way is optimal. I do, and
> that's that, at this point. No black magic, no convoluted config
> files, etc. Go deal with the ODE config and Mach's configuration
> files, I have. Or NetBSD's.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:13:22PM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Benno Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:18, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > > * De: Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
> > > [ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms". ]
> > >
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:06:11PM +0800, leafy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:54:30PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > It is already there. :-)
> >
> > Just wrapped by "WANT_EXT2FS_MODULE". So you need to add that to your
> > /etc/make.conf.
>
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:14:41PM +0200, Enache Adrian wrote:
> please add ext2fs to the modules list in src/sys/modules/Makefile.
It is already there. :-)
Just wrapped by "WANT_EXT2FS_MODULE". So you need to add that to your
/etc/make.conf.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 01:42:58PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Any objections to a diff below?
We should be moving away from magic numbers to #defined constants, not
the otherway around.
> Index: newfs/newfs.c
> ===
> RCS file:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 04:05:31PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> or simply check out the newer sources.
Looking at the commit you made, it doesn't seem to address the other
issues of the commit this thread is trying to avoid.
I guess you're not going to honor mine and others request for a fu
For those trying to actually get some FreeBSD work done today, one may
avoid this commit by:
cd /sys ; cvs up -D '2003/01/26 03:40:00 PST'
- Forwarded message from David Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: David Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha trap.c vm_ma
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 03:31:16PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> This patch is needed for the MIPS port's infrastructure, and will be
> needed for the PowerPC one, as given ports may support any number of
> platforms, on those architectures (and arguably, the same applies to
> i386 vs. pc98, but his
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:37:59AM -0500, Scott Dodson wrote:
> Is it still unsafe to build everything with p4 optimizations?
Yes. Well actually the issue is sse[2] problems. Other Pent-4
optimizations should be safe.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-curr
7;
> > > exec_elf64.o(.text+0x639): more undefined references to `be64toh' follow
> > > *** Error code 1
> > >
> > > Stop in /a/asami/portbuild/alpha/5/src/usr.sbin/crunch/crunchide.
> > > *** Error code 1
> >
> > I get the same problem trying
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 06:46:40PM +0200, Mikko Hyvarinen wrote:
> Hi again,O
>
> I find it outright odd that the partial patch that didn't help much got
> committed quickly but the final fix that makes things work didn't.
>
> Is there something wrong with the patch or did it just slip through th
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:40:45PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> a line like
>
> #warning "VM_METER is deprecated and will be removed on kluctember 43, 2861"
>
> would be nice to, of course. =-)
I wanted this, but I don't know who to implement it so that it only
prints out IIF VM_METER is used some
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 05:23:30AM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of
> VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks a few
> ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable.
I committed a work around -- vm_
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:46:25PM +0200, Andy Fawcett wrote:
> #define VM_TOTAL1 /* struct vmtotal */
> /* The following define is deprecated in favour of the above one
>and should not be used in new code */
> #define VM_METER
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:27:37AM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> I was doing the "dd" in an attempt to follow the recipe posted by Andre
> Albsmeier on
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&th=440939b0f4db6bdb&seekm=arg34b%2410hi%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&frame=off>.
[From address modified because I don't want every message in this
thread to end up in my personal mailbox. I'll read them in the
list, thank you.]
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:07:45AM -0800, Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
> I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
> on them. I
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:59:08AM -0800, Chuck McCrobie wrote:
> Two panics produced when using Linux emulation on a
> machine CVSUP'ed two hours ago. Both very easy to
> produce.
What? You didn't want accurate Linux emulation. ;-)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:07:31PM +0200, Mikko S. Hyvarinen wrote:
> The on-board 3com MAC and Broadcom/Altima PHY are not being detected by the
> xl(4) driver in -current (cvsup done yesterday evening).
> In the Award BIOS there is only one setting for the 3com device, a supposed
> on/off switch
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 10:27:21AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> I'd like to have a mirrored root partition. I tried ccd(4) but the boot
> blocks couldn't find the fs. Any idea how much work it would take to
> enable booting a ccd root? Also, does vinum already support this?
I've moved ccdconfig
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 10:14:26PM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
> On a 4.7-stable box, /usr/obj/usr/src/sys totals 34 MB.
> On a 5.0-current box, /usr/obj/usr/src/sys totals 270 MB!
The debugging format (stabs to dwarf2) has also changed from 4.x to
5-CURRENT.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 05:01:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <063601c2b4d0$ff02dc50$471b3dd4@dual>, "Willem Jan Withagen" writes:
> >But now it panics on:
> >Initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1: already started.
>
> When does it panic ? in the boot sequence ? after ?
After a
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 07:38:58PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote:
> When newsyslog.conf was modified to compress rotated log files with bzip2
> instead of gzip some 3 months ago, most of the periodic scripts that process
> those log files were not tought how to decompress those archived files.
>
> Th
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 06:00:26PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > >> ===> usr.bin/vi
> > >> *** Error code 1 (ignored)
> > >> *** Error code 1 (ignored)
> > >> ===> usr.bin/vis
...
> No; it would be more profitable to teach programmers to not ignore errors.
> whereintheworld is perfectly non-broken
Ever since the last ACPI import, I get all this output (non-verbose)
boot. What's the change on them going away soon?
acpi0: on motherboard
ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE15
ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [Z00Q] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND
ACPI-1287: *** Error
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 09:13:44AM -0600, ryan beasley wrote:
> instance of gdb was compiled from source w/ the patches found in the
> devel/gdb52 port. (I don't have room for the ports tree locally.)
pkg_add -r gdb52
(or try the gdb53 port also)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 08:24:23PM +0100, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> would please somebody look into this case and explain why wchar_t
> support wasn't enabled?
Because the GCC developers disabled it for GCC 3.2.1
> tim robins already provided a patch that will make stuff working.
Pleas
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 12:24:06PM +0300, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 09:46:03AM +0100, Gernot A. Weber wrote:
> > I upgraded from DP2 to RC2 two days ago and my machine is running very
> > unstable now... It crashes once or twice a day. When I look in
...
> First idea is -cur
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 10:40:33AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > that the pcc struct return convention had something to do with it.
>
> Did we really mean to change this? It is a relatively recent change. From
> cvs history:
>
> % RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/contrib/gcc/config/freebsd.h,v
> % Work
Got another panic with a Sat Dec 21 11:00 PST 2002 kernel:
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
This GDB was configured as "i386-undermydesk-freebsd"...
(kgdb) core-file /var/crash/vmcore.1
panic: lockmgr: draining against myself
panic messages:
---
panic: lockmgr: draining against myself
cpuid = 1; lapic.id
I've gotten this two days in a row (but wasn't configured to get a core
dump the 1st day):
kernel.debug + vmcore + src tree available to trusted individuals.
Sources are from Sat Dec 21 11:00 PST 2002.
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
This GDB was configured as "i386-undermydesk-freebsd"...
(kgdb) core-f
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:37:58AM +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
> Shouldn't libposix1e.so.2 have been part of the compat4x package?
> I came across at least one program that uses it.
Send me a list of what needs to be added, and I can look into it.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:38:13PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> then, as usual, IPFW with the new kernel and
> old world fails utterly and now the fragging machine can't access the
Hear hear!! I am >< tempted to have /sbin/ipfw moved to src/sys.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:33:18AM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> >>>This would pull files off the vendor branch; and before doing that I'd
> >>>like to know why the GCC developers have commented out those bits.
...
> But 4.7-STABLE has already support for wchar_t and it works fine
So? I want to kn
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 01:13:16PM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:36:18PM -0600, Scot W. Hetzel wrote:
> >
> >>>>>You could try the patch I've attached:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:21:46PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:45:13AM +0900, Takanori Watanabe wrote:
> > >Here is the ACPI DSDT dump (w/o acpi.ko loaded) for this machine.
> > Try DSDT override using following AML, please.
> >
> >
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:36:18PM -0600, Scot W. Hetzel wrote:
> > >>You could try the patch I've attached:
> > >>
> > >>cd /usr/src
> > >>zcat c++-wchar.diff.gz | patch
> > >>cd gnu/lib/libstdc++
> > >>make
> > >>make install
...
> Attached is the patch
This would pull files off the vendor branc
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:29:19AM +0100, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> Hmm... at some point in time it may perhaps just make perfect sense to
> replace
> the libstdc++ by the STLport library as the standard C++ library?
> The gnu libstdc++ is really somehoe hopeless.
No thanks. Please lobby the GCC g
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:08:42AM +0800, JY wrote:
> /usr/src/contrib/gcc/cp/except.c:790:18: cfns.h: No such file or directory
> mkdep: compile failed
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus.
Please cvsup again, and reply back if you still have any build problems.
To Uns
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 04:33:27PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> I'm not aware of any Tyan Thunder mobos which have onboard
> integrated video.
They *all* do. (meaning all the Tyan dual-K7 Thunders)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:38:48PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Unless we make installation of the perl package happen automatically as
> part of sysinstall. I spent an hour looking at sysinstall and got a
> head-ache.
If someone does do that -- the perl package should NOT be installed when
one
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:34:32AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Please indent the last line either 4 spaces or a tab. It is a continued
> > line.
>
> It's already indented, and we don't indent multiple times like this:
Blah, mis-read the patch. Please forget I responed before.
To Unsubscri
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:03:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Index: Makefile.inc1
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v
> retrieving revision 1.312
> diff -u -r1.312 Makefile.inc1
> --- Makefile.inc1 14 Nov 2002 19:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 09:18:46AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Right now, if I want to ensure that a particular program compiles
> with a WARNS level of no less than 3, I have to put this in the
> Makefile:
>
> WARNS?= 3
> .if ${WARNS} < 3
> WARNS= 3
> .endif
Is
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:26:00PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> Yes, thanks for the info, FWIW I think it's quite against POLA to remove
> an option yet keep it documented in the man page :)
The man pages are from 2.95 because the 3.x ones require Perl 5.6 +
texinfo to build. So we either (1) to
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:46:41PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
> >Don't worry about it; it's being totally blown out of proportion;
> No problem.. :)
>
> >there's no way anyone will commit to importing a 2 day old 3.2.1,
> >which is why I put the smiley's there.
> Hmm, it's a realease version. It's n
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 07:29:47AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I respect David's judgement about bringing 3.2.1 into the
> tree, but your statement above ("totally blown out...")
> suggests you don't follow GCC development. Several
> significant bugs were fixed between our pre-release version
> an
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:04:40PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
> I'm wondering if I should mention the new binutils.. :)
There will be a Binutils 2.13.2 import for 5.0-R w/in days.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:17:36PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2002-027.txt.asc
>
> Lukemftpd's build and install has been unplugged from the 5.0-CURRENT and
> 4.x-STABLE branches, so other than the fact that we ship the source, it's
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 05:57:41PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Will gcc 3.2.1/release be imported before 5.0R ? Just curious..
There will be no more GCC imports before 5.0-R. It is just too much code
churn with too little "road testing" before 5.0-R.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To
The /usr/bin/perl wrapper isn't solving many of the problems it was
imported to deal with. There are limitations to it that don't have a
clear "fix". One of the bigger problems is the duplicate "perl"
binaries that occurs building and using packages from /usr/ports.
Since the import of the /usr/
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:34:23PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> > Do we have consensus on this? The perl wrapper really isn't working out
> > for all the cases I hoped it would when I committed it.
>
> Yes, I think so. DES (The author?) doesn't mind. I'm for removal and so is
> Kris.
Why does DES
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 08:58:44AM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> IMVHO, the perl wrapper should be removed altogether, and the
> perl port's "use.port" symlink-creating feature should be used
> instead.
Do we have consensus on this? The perl wrapper really isn't working out
for all the cases I hope
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:44:43PM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
> You could try the patch I've attached:
>
> cd /usr/src
> zcat c++-wchar.diff.gz | patch
> cd gnu/lib/libstdc++
> make
> make install
Can you ask Kris to try this on the ports cluster before we commit it?
I wonder how many ports this c
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:47:51PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Can someone explain why the perl wrapper needs to be hardlinked to
> perl5.6.1?
revision 1.5
date: 2002-06-07 18:55:42; author: obrien; state: Exp; lines: +1 -0
Install a "perl5.6.1" wrapper. I think
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 05:47:39PM -0800, Kelly Yancey wrote:
> > A better question is why you are fixing a non-critical, over-1-year-old
> > bug in networking code this close to the release??? Networking is our
> > bread and butter, and changes to it can be tricky. A known non-critical
> > bug t
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:45:42AM -0800, Kelly Yancey wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> > On 2002-11-04 01:16, Hidetoshi Shimokawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have the same problem and reverting rev. 1.134 of
> > > /sys/kern/uipc_socket.c fixes the problem.
> > > Th
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:32:38AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Oh. So the real size of NetBSD's /bin and /sbin includes
> another 2.4M for /rescue. That makes it less
> impressive. I don't find the duplication appealing, either.
> (Why not just put the /rescue versions directly
> into /bin and
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 11:05:18PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 09:59:16PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > The following libraries are installed by COMPAT4X, but are not
> > present in 4.7. I assume these are carried forward from 4.x x < 7.
> >
> > libssl.so.1
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
> awkward. In particular, especially for people who
> have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
We aren't trying to be compatable with SysV. We are compatable with
other BSD's wi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 06:02:38PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> Considering that I built the same applications and ran the same applications
> fine a while ago, and we've had a binutils upgrade, and things don't break
> on other systems, I'm inclined to assume there are linker bugs afoot, and
> all
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:16:26AM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> No there is no reason, and yes the changes are generic. I don't really
> expect there to be many (if any) changes to libobjc that are not generic,
> so if gcc-patches is the place to go, that is where I'll go.
It is.
> In your experi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:23:53AM -0700, Chad David wrote:
>
> Which brings us back to my original question... why are ObjC threads
> disabled? I don't much care about my other patches, I just want
> to know who the 10 others are who will break if we enable threads,
> and how to fix that breakag
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:23:00AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:52:56PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > That said, if you want to make it work for you, I'm behind you
> > > 100%: I think any chan
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:52:56PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> That said, if you want to make it work for you, I'm behind you
> 100%: I think any changes you want to make are OK; they can
> always be backed out, if anyone starts complaining about them
> breaking things, so I think it's kind of si
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:02:16PM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:11:56PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:09:41PM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> > > Does anybody know if there is a good reason why libobjc is built with
> >
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:12:25PM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote:
> then gets ignored by http.c . Ignoring the bigger picture of the error
> checking, this fix at least gets https: working again by making sure
> that _fetch_putln doesn't construct an iov with iov_len == 0. (Yes,
> this is against rev
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:09:41PM -0700, Chad David wrote:
> Does anybody know if there is a good reason why libobjc is built with
> thr-single.c? As well, who is the current maintainer of Objective-C?
Few of us have ObjC clue. Do you have a patch that makes things better
that you can explain t
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:39:15PM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> You can also get various new machines on sun.com for around $1000 USD,
> IIRC a 500mhz blade 100 does a buildworld in around 2-3 hours.
A $1000 (new) 500 MHz blade running GENERIC (minus WITNESS) builds world
in a little under 3 ho
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 08:13:18PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I have an ATAPI dvd writer on a firewire<->atapi converter
> that connects to CAM via SBP-2.
> Using some patches for cdrecord that are available on the internet I
> got it to write fine, so tehatapi and SCSI commands for writing a
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:40:53PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> Would it be acceptable to apply the following patch to link groff
> statically so as to unbreak the alpha world while the binutils
> maintainer figures out why ld is broken?
Committed.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
201 - 300 of 1694 matches
Mail list logo
