On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:46:45PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
You need a different version for -current than for -stable. Make sure
you have the right version.
I got the same problem with Xwrapper -- and it was compiled on this
5-CURRENT w/in the past 6 months.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:15:44PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:46:45PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: You need a different version for -current than for -stable. Make sure
: you
I'm fairly sure JHB does not have a patch to address this but, please,
be my guest and check P4.
Actually he does. Maybe you should have checked p4 first yourself.
Users of Perforce are starting to force the rest of us to learn and use
it. That is totally not acceptable for the
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:05:31AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
I ventured into this brave new world a few days ago and ran into
this very problem. Alexander's patch (along with a make install in
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils) fixed it, as advertised.
Maybe this can now be committed?
NOT until
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 03:39:08PM -0600, Michael D. Harnois wrote:
On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 13:29, Terry Lambert wrote:
Michael D. Harnois wrote:
On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 04:03, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:05:31AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
Maybe this can now
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:29:46AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Actually, there was a discussion at BSDCon as to whether or
not to drop the a.out support in order to decrease the patch
size necessary to make the FSF distributed code do what FreeBSD
That is true for GCC. For contrib/binutils,
The existing very bazaar and local policy in rc.diskless1 is Just Wrong;
and looks like no other Unix diskless configuration I've ever seen. I
plan on committing this patch to negate this.
The use of an MFS /var should also be settable. Otherwise installing
ports(packages) is just a total
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 05:00:37PM -0600, robert garrett wrote:
Could someone tell me where documentation concerning the
use of perforce and or, how to gain access to is located?
Up until very recently I was not aware of it's existence.
This would make it very difficult for someone new to
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:02:38PM +0100, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
Using ktrace(1), I found that now cc searchs its subcomponents in
/usr/libexec/elf. However, installworld puts them in /usr/libexec.
...
Could this problem be related to the recent changes to
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 05:53:59AM -0800, Edwin Culp wrote:
On my daily build, my kernels are broken as per log:
=== wi
cd /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PIII850N; MAKESRCPATH=/usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm
make -
f /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/Makefile
Warning: Object directory not changed
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:02:38PM +0100, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
$ cc p.c -o p
cc: installation problem, cannot exec `cpp0': No such file or directory
Fixed.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:51:31PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Bitkeeper enforces the linux devleopment model
to a large extent,
In what way(s)?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:30:43PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
it's problematic to do an apr port at this time because there is no
stable release of apr, and subversion requires bleeding edge apr to
function anyway.
*shrug* so we need a port of a devel version of apr. It's what
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:12:16AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
While testing some Giant removal stuff I noticed that my current
system sometimes got into an extremely non-optimal flip-flop situation
between two processes contesting Giant on an SMP system which halved the
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:51:44AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:I request that you give say a 3 day review period for this.
:I know JHB still has limited email access (no DSL yet).
:This may be something he should review.
Sigh. Are you intending to ask me to have JHB review every
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:32:31PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
People like to bitch and moan about my commits but, frankly, there isn't
much to really bitch and moan about if you actually look at the commits.
I really did not think I was bitching about your commit. I just thought
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 05:59:02PM +0300, Andrej Cernov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 17:35:27 +0300, Vladimir B.Grebenschikov wrote:
Programm linked against libpng.so on -CURRNET causes SIGBUS on startup
How-To-Repeat:
% cat trypng.c
#include stdio.h
main(int ac, char **
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:14:42PM +0300, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
It was in chroot created today as:
# cd /usr/src
# cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ncvs upd -dP
# make buildworld
# make installworld DESTDIR=/X/chroot
# cd /usr/src/etc make destribution
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:23:33PM +0500, Vladimir G. Drobyshevsky wrote:
MT I tried to look with ports/devel/ddd but got stuck by the fact
MT that the problem seems to be ld-elf.so.1 and not wdm.
MT (gdb) core-file /wdm.core
MT Core was generated by `wdm'.
MT Program terminated with
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:30:22PM -0500, Nat Lanza wrote:
Surely you see the difference between That's an interesting idea; can
you generate some patches so we can take a look and see how it works
out? and WhereTF is your patch to do this?.
Yes there is. Earlier on in the thread I would
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:40:31AM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
David O'Brien writes:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
What is so hard about allowing someone to specify the list of frontends
to provide at system build time? I thought that gcc was supposed
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:54:22PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
how about a port that uses the installed sources
together with some uploaded parts to 'reconstitute' gcj as if it had been
compiled wit the rest of the system.
FreeBSD does a fairly evil thing: it
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:05:16PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Uh, NO! It is not needed by the base system. We really do not want to
turn on all the support libs, etc.. that would be needed with this.
There is a reason the gcc30 port takes 25 minutes to compile on a fast
1.2 GHz
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:39:35AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
I believe, what I see. And that is, FreeBSD includes both -- gdb and
gcc, but only one libbfd, thankfully. And I want to be able to use that
same libbfd for my own development and for porting of other compilers
and
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
So what? When I install gcc on a non-native platform (such as HP-UX or
Solaris),
Again, WHAT IS THE PROBLEM you are trying to solve? Just laziness of not
being willing to type ``pkg_add -r gcc30'' or ``pkg_add -r gcc31''?
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:29:57PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
- is GCC3 also better on Alpha as far as correctness of the generated
code goes? Or is that what you mean by bad optimised code ?
We shall see.
- The gcc 2.95 compiler is quite a bit slower (it appears) on Alpha than
on x86.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:57:47PM +0100, BOUWSMA Beery wrote:
I've changed my /etc/make.conf from the default, to be
MODULES_WITH_WORLD=true # do not build modules when building kernel
since I find myself often building new kernels (plus identical
modules) without updating the rest of the
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
What is so hard about allowing someone to specify the list of frontends
to provide at system build time? I thought that gcc was supposed to be
a modular compiler system, and that all we are asking for is the ability
to add to the
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:00:19AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Max Khon wrote:
please calm down. seems that you have never installed gcc from ports.
gcc 2.95 from ports is installed as gcc295/g++295
and correctly gets its bits from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/xxx,
gcc 3.0x from ports is
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:39:35AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
I believe, what I see. And that is, FreeBSD includes both -- gdb and
gcc, but only one libbfd, thankfully. And I want to be able to use that
same libbfd for my own development and for porting of other compilers
and
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:29:57PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
- is GCC3 also better on Alpha as far as correctness of the generated
code goes? Or is that what you mean by bad optimised code ?
We shall see.
- The gcc 2.95 compiler is quite a bit slower (it appears) on Alpha than
on x86.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:30:22PM -0500, Nat Lanza wrote:
Surely you see the difference between That's an interesting idea; can
you generate some patches so we can take a look and see how it works
out? and WhereTF is your patch to do this?.
Yes there is. Earlier on in the thread I would
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:39:36PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
3.1 will also be slower on the Alpha. It is really an issue of the code
generator. Generating x86 code on an Alpha is faster than generating
[native] Alpha code. The Alpha code generator is slow. It may be that
all 64 bit or
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:41:33AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Ports does the same thing: hand tweaks stuff instead of
pushing the patches back to the projects that originated
it.
*sigh* Terry I respect your programming knowledge, but you are wrong
here. I send out a *LOT* of patches to
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:55:26PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
stuff; the ports stuff will be more problematic, of course,
but much of that is already broken, in that the system
compiler is passed, but the g++ compiler is searched out
and preferred (!@#!$!@ autoconf/automake).
env
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:57:47PM +0100, BOUWSMA Beery wrote:
I've changed my /etc/make.conf from the default, to be
MODULES_WITH_WORLD=true # do not build modules when building kernel
since I find myself often building new kernels (plus identical
modules) without updating the rest of the
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:02:34AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
WITNESS can really hurt. Quite possibly I should turn it off in
GENERIC now (I wouldn't mind if someone else did that.)
I think it should stay. Especially as we are not getting much usage in
-CURRENT. If we turn it off by
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:10:05AM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
On current On stable
-- --
real7m 43.392s 4m 53.100sin /usr/src for current
user0m 11.692s 0m 4.203s
sys 3m 4.601s 0m 2.248s
real6m 40.322s
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:21:07AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
Well, I think that's true: no one is saying you can't fix the warnings you
find by turning up the warning level.
Well... it would be nice if people would do CORRECT fixes. From
some things DES was saying, people are making some
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:12:38AM +, Mark Murray wrote:
IMO, this is a good reason to not have WARNS contain -Werror at this
time. NO_WERROR is a good way to fix this (again IMO). I see a great
need to let warnings hang out, and in an ideal world I see an need
for (new) warnings to break
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:05:16PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Uh, NO! It is not needed by the base system. We really do not want to
turn on all the support libs, etc.. that would be needed with this.
There is a reason the gcc30 port takes 25 minutes to compile on a fast
1.2 GHz
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:46:22PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
dynamically linked libiberty would be a nightmare.
libbfd anf libiberty do not have version numbers, are not maintained
(i.e. there is no official releases). every project includes its own
libiberty and imho an
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:23:32PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
It is plain that many people will want to be able to install a version
of gcc that is officially supported and that also includes *all* of the
standard platforms that come as part of the gcc release.
You do realize that means Ada for
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
So what? When I install gcc on a non-native platform (such as HP-UX or
Solaris),
Again, WHAT IS THE PROBLEM you are trying to solve? Just laziness of not
being willing to type ``pkg_add -r gcc30'' or ``pkg_add -r gcc31''?
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:38:02PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On 6 Feb, David O'Brien wrote:
Yes it comes as part of binutils.
Ok.
No we should not go down this path. You've already been told that
there is no official libiberty or bfd release.
Well, the following URL
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:54:22PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
how about a port that uses the installed sources
together with some uploaded parts to 'reconstitute' gcj as if it had been
compiled wit the rest of the system.
FreeBSD does a fairly evil thing: it
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:06:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
If you use the argument that one shouldn't set WARNS because a new
compiler will cause the tree to break, then there's no point having it
at all since that condition will always be true.
The difference is _impending_.
--
--
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:43:23PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
The fix was as simple as this:
Thanks!! Committed.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 03:30:32PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
This delta breaks buildworld. gcc(1) has a known bug-feature
of hiding some errors in standard system headers, making them
invisible without -I.
...
and compile now can't survive the WARNS=4.
Not to mention there is ZERO way
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 03:56:45PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
If this fixes a problem, then please go ahead and commit it. :-)
Many reasons to not rush this:
Maybe because we are in the middle of a discussion.
Maybe to educate others why the change was bad so others will not attempt
the same
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:24:54PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
This still *is* -CURRENT, right? If it doesn't break, once in a
while, how will new things be tested by the -CURRENT userbase?
A make world before commit? Is this a trick question?
Please see the
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 11:07:19AM -0500, Alan Eldridge wrote:
How are you going to tell, in the objprelink port, what version of
binutils you're working with? If you patch it to fix the -current problem,
you'll likely break -stable.
I plan on MFC'ing Binutils 2.12.0 when it is released in 2
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:51:54PM -0500, Alan Eldridge wrote:
Is ld --version a reliable indicator?
Should be.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:20:39AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
That's easy to say when signing up somebody else to do the work.
Seriously though, in spite of pretending otherwise, i386 *is* our reference
platform, and the other platforms require people with the hardware and
interest to keep it
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 07:08:21PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
David!
After the latest binutils import, attempts to cross-compile
Alpha fail at the cross-tools stage of buildworld as shown
below. Please also note sed(1) complaints about nonexistent
ldscripts/ files. I suspect that
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:51:08PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
Recent -current on my system at work exhibits processes getting stuck in the
``inode'' state, causing the system to become unusable and requiring a reboot.
I have been seeing this for about a week now; anyone else?
I have been
I am unable to get OPIE challenges from telnetd as I can with S/Key in
RELENG_4. Ie:
login: obrien
s/key 187 re99461
Password:
s/key 187 re99461
Password [echo on]:
Anyone know how to get this on -CURRENT now days?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know how to get this on -CURRENT now days?
No problem for me.
.. enable it in /etc/pam.conf:
login authsufficient pam_opie.so no_warn
Yes, this is what
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:17:43PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
The problem is that the exported FSs exports are managed in the
per FS mount code, and they really ought to be managed in higher
level code (above the VFS layer, but still in the kernel).
This is incidently what prevents us from
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:00:19PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- The MBR partition table is not obsolete, it's a part of the PC
architecture specification.
Its design is antique. Or rather: it's missing a design. See other
mail for the reasons.
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 02:36:49PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
The patch is at http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/i386_asm.patch. Mostly it
does the following:
Can you compile some files with gcc30 and see if you get any
new/different warnings about this. Also look at the i386.md file for
Ok, who (and what) broke the kernel build?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 07:09:18AM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
This probably needs to be changed so that awk is a buildtool, and one
is built early to use when building the loader.
It doesn't need to be a build tool... unless you want to make 'ls' a
build tool also. We had one bump in
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:23:43PM +0300, Juriy Goloveshkin wrote:
Is mozilla broken or it is a local problem?
...
/usr/include/malloc.h:3: #error malloc.h has been replaced by stdlib.h
Yes, Mozilla is doing wrong things.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:10:08AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
/usr/src/lib/compat/compat4x.alpha /tstsys/alpha/compile/GPLUS
yorp.feral.com root make obj all install clean
You cannot do this due to make(1) evaluation timming. You need to do:
root
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:44:12AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
Next bad thing discovered about new awk just looking at sourse code: it
not support locale (collating in regexp ranges too, of course). We just
make great backward step switching to it.
I have a patch for that.
--
-- David
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:23:12PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
No, awk should be fixed instead to conform POSIX specs, or switched back
to gawk.
It's not a binary decision. What we should probably do is:
1) Disconnect bwk-awk from the build.
2) Connect gawk to the build.
3) Fix
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:42:18PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Although I admit the fallout has been somewhat painful, let's
try to make do with it, if we disconnect the new awk I feel
that we will keep repeating this cycle, basically each activation
will see new problems requiring
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
Can someone revert awk to one that actually works?
Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead??
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:56:18PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
Can someone revert awk to one that actually works?
Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 05:14:34PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead??
What about this patch?
It does not work.
+cat 'EOT'
+/* XXX obnoxious prerequisites
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:12:43PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
My only purpose in replying was to state my objection to the
sufficency of David's argument. There are a lot of things that aren't
required, but are a good idea none the less.
All I'll say is just about every large change I
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 10:29:00AM -0800, matt wrote:
any one know if my 4.3 stable work with all AMD
processors, as well as with SMP enabled?
Yes it will. I certifed 4.3 RELEASE (and thus 4.3-STABLE) on the SMP
Thunder for AMD.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 02:06:00PM -, cameron grant wrote:
my system with dual 1.1ghz durons identifies as:
CPU: AMD Duron(tm) MP Processor (1110.94-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x670 Stepping = 0
Another question , what is the function of PS2 and when to use it ? Please
advise
I advise you to use
PS2=smokin'crack?
as I do.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:33:09PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
Is a real need for ports under -CURRENT to require (from a
week or two, I don't remember) XFree86-libraries?
Yes.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 01:37:29PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
From sys/i386/include/ansi.h:
(1) #if defined __GNUC__
(2) #if (__GNUC__ 2 || __GNUC__ == 2 __GNUC_MINOR__ 95)
(3) #define _BSD_VA_LIST_ __builtin_va_list /* internally known to gcc */
(4) #endif
(5) typedef
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:15:34AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
I am interested in what is the best way to get a test system running
current? I have tried both upgrading from 4.4-stable (ran into kernel
build problems)
It would be nice to see the problems you experienced. One is supose to
be
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 09:32:56PM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
Index: gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/i386/kvm-fbsd.c
===
RCS file: /dump/FreeBSD-CVS/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/i386/kvm-fbsd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -r1.27
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 03:26:40AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
I could rent one at a colocation facility. But I live in Silicon
Valley, and I can't even get a connection faster than an ISDN line;
I'm 2000 feet too far away for DSL.
Uh Terry, you know very well you have a freefall.freebsd.org
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:35:14AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
UUCP still gets used. It's one of the few sane ways to handle email in
a laptop environment when you're always connecting through different
dialups/ISPs. It has mostly fallen out of favour due to ignorance and
FUD. Which
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 04:29:08PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
cd /var/d10/FreeBSD-2001-10-01/src/lib/libedit sh
/var/d10/FreeBSD-2001-10-01/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root -g wheel -m 444
histedit.h /usr/obj/var/d10/FreeBSD-2001-10-01/src/i386/usr/include
install: histedit.h: No such file
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:49:16PM +0300, Gene Raytsin wrote:
hi,
Hi.
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include
install: histedit.h: No such file or directory
Getting this like 3d time as of today.
Any ideas?
Yeah, do what ever you do to retrieve this mailing list; then read any
new messages
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:43:50AM +0300, Gene Raytsin wrote:
and I am sorry for offtopic, ofcourse
It wasn't off topic. Users of -current just have responsibilities (such
as reading the freebsd-current list) before posting about a problem.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 08:06:20AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
Today's -CURRENT build breaks:
Thanks for the note. I'm looking now what is different from my test box
and what everyone else has.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 09:10:45PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
What about ports committers who test their ports on -current, but may
not have a very good C knowledge(like myself).
You would read this list (as obviously you do if you saw this thread).
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 04:38:10AM -0700, Andrei Popov wrote:
After a recent (last week) cvsup and make world I am getting the
following error whe trying to cvsup -CURRENT:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libutil.so.3: Undefined symbol
__stdoutp
I cannot believe I am seeing this. Do
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 02:22:07PM -0400, David Hill wrote:
Would it be okay to add the dictionary protocol to /etc/services?
done
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 03:27:26PM +0700, John Indra wrote:
I have just finished building and installing a very recent -CURRENT. Now, my
Yahoo! Messenger can't start with the following error message:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libm.so.2: Undefined symbol __stderrp
Please don't flame
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 05:17:32PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
A cursory review of email headers in -current's archive is not
spectacularly illuminating.
I would say
Subject: libutil.so.3: Undefined symbol __stdoutp
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:06:47 +0800
is right on the money!
To
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 07:02:30PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 05:17:32PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
A cursory review of email headers in -current's archive is not
spectacularly illuminating.
I would say
Subject: libutil.so.3: Undefined symbol __stdoutp
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 04:26:24PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
For me, this didn't help for some programs which were linked with
the old C library but the new maths library. I had some ports which
I had built in this catagory. Mind you, I haven't done a buildworld
since the weekend, so I may
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:36:32AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
run before rc.devfs, i.e. before the symlink is created. Could rc.devfs not be
moved up in rc so this does work?
done
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 08:49:29PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
Is there any reason to assume that specifying CPUTYPE ev56 has any
influence on the lock order reversal?
No that I know of. I used to run a -CURRENT DS20 with CPUTYPE=ev56.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:22:03PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
root[265] make installkernel
cd /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/C456086-A; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj
...
What steps lead up to this?
``make buildworld make kernel make kernelinstall''
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:59:42PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Nope, you please try to restructure it along the lines of
src/usr.bin/xinstall/Makefile rev 1.16.
I'll consider it.
Also, won't it be better to use the libc version of basename.c?
Maybe, but I do not want more cross-tree source
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:33:09PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Please try the attached patch. I'm going to attempt to unbreak
the upgrade path from 4.1-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT sometimes in
the near future.
Please try to restructure it along the lines of
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
Until you have to leave something essential out and then we are SOL. For
alpha I could think of only supporting CD installs, and drop floppies
altogether. This follows DECs/CPQs convention of only supporting OS installs
Only after
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:13:08PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
nobody should be running an open FTP server that allows
uploading to anyone unless they are willing to take the time to
monitor it
Some ftp daemons have the option to
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:59:04AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hehe, it's time to add bzip2 into loader ;) I had a patch, but it provides
only marginal improvement as due to memory constrains you can only use
100k compression blocks, `bzip2 -1', but it still provides 3% better
compression
601 - 700 of 1574 matches
Mail list logo
