On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:44:12AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> Next bad thing discovered about new awk just looking at sourse code: it
> not support locale (collating in regexp ranges too, of course). We just
> make great backward step switching to it.
I have a patch for that.
--
-- David
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:42:18PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > Although I admit the fallout has been somewhat painful, let's
> > try to make do with it, if we disconnect the new awk I feel
> > that we will keep repeating this cycle, basically each activation
> > will see new problems requiring
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:23:12PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > No, awk should be fixed instead to conform POSIX specs, or switched back
> > to gawk.
>
> It's not a binary decision. What we should probably do is:
>
> 1) Disconnect bwk-awk from the build.
> 2) Connect gawk to the build.
> 3)
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:12:43PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> My only purpose in replying was to state my objection to the
> sufficency of David's argument. There are a lot of things that aren't
> "required," but are a good idea none the less.
All I'll say is just about every large change
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 05:14:34PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead??
>
> What about this patch?
It does not work.
> +cat <<'
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:56:18PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > Can someone revert awk to one that actually works?
> >
> > Why d
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Can someone revert awk to one that actually works?
Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead??
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 10:29:00AM -0800, matt wrote:
> any one know if my 4.3 stable work with all AMD
> processors, as well as with SMP enabled?
Yes it will. I certifed 4.3 RELEASE (and thus 4.3-STABLE) on the SMP
Thunder for AMD.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 02:06:00PM -, cameron grant wrote:
> my system with dual 1.1ghz durons identifies as:
>
> CPU: AMD Duron(tm) MP Processor (1110.94-MHz 686-class CPU)
> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x670 Stepping = 0
>
> Features=0x383fbff CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE>
> AMD Feat
> Another question , what is the function of PS2 and when to use it ? Please
> advise
I advise you to use
PS2="smokin'crack? > "
as I do.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:33:09PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> Is a real need for ports under -CURRENT to require (from a
> week or two, I don't remember) XFree86-libraries?
Yes.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 01:37:29PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > >From sys/i386/include/ansi.h:
> >
> > (1) #if defined __GNUC__
> > (2) #if (__GNUC__ > 2 || __GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ > 95)
> > (3) #define _BSD_VA_LIST_ __builtin_va_list /* internally known to gcc */
> > (4) #end
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:15:34AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> I am interested in what is the best way to get a test system running
> current? I have tried both upgrading from 4.4-stable (ran into kernel
> build problems)
It would be nice to see the problems you experienced. One is supose to
be
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 09:32:56PM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
> Index: gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/i386/kvm-fbsd.c
> ===
> RCS file: /dump/FreeBSD-CVS/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/i386/kvm-fbsd.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.27
> diff -u -r1.2
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 03:26:40AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I could rent one at a colocation facility. But I live in Silicon
> Valley, and I can't even get a connection faster than an ISDN line;
> I'm 2000 feet "too far away" for DSL.
Uh Terry, you know very well you have a freefall.freebsd
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:35:14AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > UUCP still gets used. It's one of the few sane ways to handle email in
> > a laptop environment when you're always connecting through different
> > dialups/ISPs. It has mostly fallen out of favour due to ignorance and
> > FUD
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:43:50AM +0300, Gene Raytsin wrote:
> and I am sorry for offtopic, ofcourse
It wasn't off topic. Users of -current just have responsibilities (such
as reading the freebsd-current list) before posting about a problem.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:49:16PM +0300, Gene Raytsin wrote:
> hi,
Hi.
> /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include
> install: histedit.h: No such file or directory
>
> Getting this like 3d time as of today.
> Any ideas?
Yeah, do what ever you do to retrieve this mailing list; then read any
new messa
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 04:29:08PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> cd /var/d10/FreeBSD-2001-10-01/src/lib/libedit && sh
>/var/d10/FreeBSD-2001-10-01/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root -g wheel -m 444
>histedit.h /usr/obj/var/d10/FreeBSD-2001-10-01/src/i386/usr/include
> install: histedit.h: No such
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 08:06:20AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> Today's -CURRENT build breaks:
Thanks for the note. I'm looking now what is different from my test box
and what everyone else has.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 09:10:45PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> What about ports committers who test their ports on -current, but may
> not have a very good C knowledge(like myself).
You would read this list (as obviously you do if you saw this thread).
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 02:22:07PM -0400, David Hill wrote:
> Would it be okay to add the dictionary protocol to /etc/services?
done
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 04:38:10AM -0700, Andrei Popov wrote:
> After a recent (last week) cvsup and make world I am getting the
> following error whe trying to cvsup -CURRENT:
>
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libutil.so.3: Undefined symbol
> "__stdoutp"
I cannot believe I am seeing this.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 07:02:30PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 05:17:32PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > A cursory review of email headers in -current's archive is not
> > spectacularly illuminating.
>
> I would say
>
> Su
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 05:17:32PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> A cursory review of email headers in -current's archive is not
> spectacularly illuminating.
I would say
Subject: libutil.so.3: Undefined symbol "__stdoutp"
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:06:47 +0800
is right on the money!
To
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 04:26:24PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> For me, this didn't help for some programs which were linked with
> the old C library but the new maths library. I had some ports which
> I had built in this catagory. Mind you, I haven't done a buildworld
> since the weekend, so I ma
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 03:27:26PM +0700, John Indra wrote:
> I have just finished building and installing a very recent -CURRENT. Now, my
> Yahoo! Messenger can't start with the following error message:
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libm.so.2: Undefined symbol "__stderrp"
>
> Please don't
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:36:32AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
> run before rc.devfs, i.e. before the symlink is created. Could rc.devfs not be
> moved up in rc so this does work?
done
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 08:49:29PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Is there any reason to assume that specifying CPUTYPE ev56 has any
> influence on the lock order reversal?
No that I know of. I used to run a -CURRENT DS20 with CPUTYPE=ev56.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsu
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:22:03PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> root[265] make installkernel
> cd /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/C456086-A; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj
...
What steps lead up to this?
``make buildworld && make kernel && make kernelinstall''
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:59:42PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Nope, you please try to restructure it along the lines of
> src/usr.bin/xinstall/Makefile rev 1.16.
I'll consider it.
> Also, won't it be better to use the libc version of basename.c?
Maybe, but I do not want more cross-tree sour
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:33:09PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Please try the attached patch. I'm going to attempt to unbreak
> the upgrade path from 4.1-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT sometimes in
> the near future.
Please try to restructure it along the lines of
src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/M
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:13:08PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> > nobody should be running an open FTP server that allows
> > uploading to anyone unless they are willing to take the time to
> > monitor it
>
> Some ftp daemons have the option to au
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 06:37:22PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> I have a patch for sysinstall which allows you to load kld's from a floppy.
Please post!! :-)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:59:04AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Hehe, it's time to add bzip2 into loader ;) I had a patch, but it provides
> only marginal improvement as due to memory constrains you can only use
> 100k compression blocks, `bzip2 -1', but it still provides 3% better
> compression
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Until you have to leave something essential out and then we are SOL. For
> alpha I could think of only supporting CD installs, and drop floppies
> altogether. This follows DECs/CPQs convention of only supporting OS installs
Only after
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 09:44:30PM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote:
> At 15:32 -0400 11/9/01, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> >I'm glad to see that, with a little help, you've managed to get the
> >code into good-enough shape to make this work out. This is an
> >important unit of functionality for FreeBSD 5.0 a
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 01:16:14PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:19:28AM -0700, Adam Kranzel wrote:
> > I did not see one annouced by jdp, sorry for the redundancy if
> > there is already one available :)
>
> There are 4.x, 3.5, and 2.2 binaries on jdp's page. Unfortuna
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 01:28:12PM -0500, Michael Harnois wrote:
> For the last five days or so, dhclient from isc-dhcp2 has not worked
> with -current on my machine. It reports "dc0: not found". Some others
> reported a similar problem with postfix which was cured by
> recompiling. The same solut
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 04:58:28PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> It happens to work if I build amd in /usr/src. If I have /usr/obj/...
You can guess how I tested it... ;-)
My reference box's build failed last night in libc. I'm updating it now
so I can fix this.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:21:06PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> I think it can safely be said that you're rebooting too much. The
> process can be simplified to:
> make world
> make kernel
> mergemaster
> reboot
For -current I would suggest a slight modification to this -- to make
sure everythi
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:15:59PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
> > In the case of forth, the interpreter will accept nothing that looks even
> > vaguely simular to C/C++, FORTRAN, bourne shell, awk, or perl.
...
> It's been a very long time since FORTRAN fit in 4k, I don't think C
> ever did, bourne
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:03:37PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > The GCC and OpenBSD people depend on anoncvs as their main repo transport
> > mechanism.
>
> (You can't transport a repo with cvs. OpenBSD infrastructure
Not in the sense of CVSup, but for some defintion of "transport" yo
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:26:22PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > I myself questioned the wisdom of using Forth at the time, and Jordan
> > simply replied I was free to find a more popular language with a freely
> > available interpreter that would fit in as small a space as FICL did.
>
> I a
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:35:41PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" writes:
> >On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:33:30AM -0700, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> phk 2001/09/04 01:33:30 PDT
> >&
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:54:20AM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> - You need a pretty powerful machine to handle even, say, 4-6 clients
> at a time. Anonymous CVS is a hog like you wouldn't believe.
> Don't try to use the machine for anything else if you're using it
> for anonymous CVS.
I ha
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 12:04:49PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> > Or why is BSD make used when the vast majority of Free Software developpers
> > use GNU make?
>
> 1)It actually works
You forgot the syntax is nearly the same as GNU Make.
(or rather both accept nearly
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:33:30AM -0700, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> phk 2001/09/04 01:33:30 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> sys/dev/ccd ccd.c
> sys/modules/ccd Makefile
> sys/sys ccdvar.h
> Log:
> Kill the NCCD constant by modernizing the ccd dri
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:38:06AM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> KSrinivasa Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For some reasons I was unable to checkout sources from cvs server of
> > FreeBSD sources. I have been using anoncvs.FreeBSD.org to fetch the
> >
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:48:24AM -0300, Daniel Capo Sobral wrote:
> When I first wrote the loader.conf thingy, I couldn't get the value
> of environment variables from the FICL environment.
...
> Anyway, I have been too busy lately to do anything with FreeBSD that
> is not directly related to th
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:04:39PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> It has been pointed out that the stumbling block is ~10 lines
> of Akpha assembly language code that Julian is asking that
> someone familiar with the Alpha write.
>
> Julian is not an Alpha assembly language guru. In order to
> ma
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 01:17:01AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > > For $500-$600 I can put you on a 500MHz 21164 Alpha.
> > > > I've invested $2500 from my own pocket in Alpha hardware, so others with
> > > > nice Bay Area saleries can too. :-)
> > >
> > > Remember tha
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 08:03:15PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> > I find it distressing that you are the *only* person doing SMPng work,
> > and people aren't giving your opinion a 10x weighting.
>
> I'm not the only person, and I only get one vote.
But you are the leading expert in SMPng, and
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:36:56PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
> Actually, I'd like to see both projects proceed, but apparently what
> non-core contributers to FreeBSD think doesn't matter.
It is an issue of effort and practicality. We are not talking about what
should be the default window manage
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:47:30AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > Blah. You're vote doesn't mean jack in this.
>
> Be that as it may, this kind of message does mean something, but it's
> nothing positive. We've had enough nastiness in this area already.
> If you don't like what Jim's saying, why
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 10:39:23AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> I wasn't in favor of KSE's in 5.0 at Usenix, but saw that I was in an obvious
> minority. I'm still in the minority and realize that and don't expect my
> opinions here to make any difference. I just wanted to voice my concerns.
I
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 03:13:19PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
>
> Count my vote as a go-for-it.
Blah. You're vote doesn't mean jack in this.
Unless you are one actively working on the 5-CURRENT kernel (SMPng
specifically), or are funding 5-CURRENT kernel development; you really
don't have any righ
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 02:48:21PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I don't WANT to commit without more testing and more support for the other
> platforms. However I need support from the people DOING
> those platforms to go further.
For $500-$600 I can put you on a 500MHz 21164 Alpha.
I've inve
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:34:06AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> Just to get this out in the public: I for one think 5.x has enough changes in
> it and would like for KSE to be postponed to 6.0-current and 6.0-release. I
> know that I am in the minority on this, but wanted to say it anyways.
You
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 10:44:04PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> This compiles and runs pretty solidly on 386.
> it needs people who understand the other architectures to make
> the appropriate changes and send them to me (or check them int P4)
Have you even tried compiling this on beast.freebs
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:10:55AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Compiling sources cvs'ed this morning (Aug 27th), I get this error:
>
> cd /auto/roy/dist/pub/FreeBSD/CURRENT/src/usr.bin/file; make build-tools
> make: don't know how to make build-tools. Stop
> *** Error code 2
Are you sure y
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:10:53PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > Then please enumerate them so that they can be given due attention.
> > This is exactly the sort of detailed feedback that was requested when
> > we first raised the issue of switching over, and nobody could come up
> > with an
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 02:02:21PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Probably because it's just too late. During the initial
> discussion, the voices pro and contra were about 50:50 (at
> least that was my impression), and finally the pro ones
> succeeded, probably because they had more "weight" (thi
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 09:19:36PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Too bad, the published Apple's link
> http://www.apple.com/macosx/usingosx/internet.html
> is broken :(
http://www.apple.com/creative/webpro/technology/webdav/
http://www.apple.com/creative/webpro/technology/webdavsetup/
On a -current Alpha box I cannot:
cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl
make cleandir && make cleandir
make obj
make depend
make depend
===> libperl
Extracting config.h (with variable substitutions)
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a -I/files/Obj/files/Current/gnu/usr.bin/perl/libperl
I finally got a crashdump by C-A-Esc and doing `call dumpsys'. In the
past I have done a C-A-Esc and `panic' and had the writing to dumpdev
hang. Not sure why it worked this time.
Anyway, what should I do with the crashdump to figure out what is going
on with my system disk hanging? Also is `p
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 03:11:00PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> If someone could roll a tarball for me, I could atleast make the
> skeleton for the port if not finish it off.
We should just repo copy it to ports. See how I do the setcdboot port.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To U
diskcheckd is very annoying. Many doubt its usefulness in detecting
errors before it is too late. It thinks 40% of my disks are bad (which
I don't). I've turned it off, I know many that have.
I would like to remove it from the base system and put it in ports. I
really don't see what justifies
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:15:20PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > You didn't MFC the iso.1 target. We are all building releases on
> > RELENG_4 right now :-) (-current releases have been broken for quite a
> > while). Thus my patch was developed on RELENG_4 and only committed to
> > current so
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:51:31PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> H. I'm not sure why this reinvents a lot of the "wheel" in the
> already existing iso.1 target. Could you explain its purpose a little
> better as well as why you didn't simply conditionalize the iso.1
> target in some way if
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 05:37:51PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> I can't believe I hear that from you, Bruce. :-)
> Generation at install time is a damn bad idea, please see below.
[...]
> 1. This won't work for cross-platform installworld, since ./file
> is targetted for a different platfo
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:40:19PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:55:56AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > >From a correctness stand point, building the .mgc files at install time
> >
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 04:00:50PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I ported the code to allow gcc to report functions that use too much
> of our 3.4KB kernel stacks.
Actually I thought I did. :-) Is your final patch different from the
one I did and sent you?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
# uname -a
FreeBSD phuong.nuxi.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #12: Sun Jul 15 19:07:45 PDT
2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/files/Current/sys/alpha/compile/DS20 alpha
panic: mutex Giant not owned at ../../../kern/vfs_subr.c:2363
#0 0xfc3d5c80 in dumpsys () at ../../../kern/kern_shutdo
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:30:45PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Just to clarify. Nothing should be built in ${.OBJDIR} at install time,
> as it may be read-only.
Correct.
> The build in ${DESTDIR} is allowed, we, for
> example, execute makewhatis(1) at the end of `installworld'. But this
>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 01:23:40PM +0200, Johann Visagie wrote:
> if ( "$tty" != "" ) then
>
> (There may be a more elegant way to check for shell interactivity in csh, and
> if there is I'd like to know about it, please. :-)
I've used "if ($?USER == 0 || $?prompt == 0)" in the past.
To Unsu
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 09:54:04AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > They produce the same output, but in the general case they do not need
> > to.
>
> What I hear? Hell, then my solution (or something similar) should be
> committed, as it at least unbreaks the 4.x -> 5.0 upgrade path, which
> I
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 06:01:55PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
> > I should have mentioned this.
> > /tmp is on /, which is UFS, mounted noatime and with softupdates enabled.
> > Plenty of freespace:/dev/da0s1a 1.3G 843M 361M 70% /
>
> Same thing happens to me, but it's when s
I should have mentioned this.
/tmp is on /, which is UFS, mounted noatime and with softupdates enabled.
Plenty of freespace:/dev/da0s1a 1.3G 843M 361M 70% /
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hello?? Those that have committed to /sys in the past 1.5mo, awake?
I am continuing to suffer thru what appears to be inode deadlocks where
the resulting race-to-the-root soon locks everything up solid. Tried to
figure out how to reproduce it on demand. All I can characterize is the
file activ
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 08:23:00PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Your solution does not work. You're creating binary files in HOST
> > format during the build phase and expecting things such as alignment
> > and endianness to be the same as the TARGET format. Unless the tools
> > are built t
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 04:13:52AM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
> from what i've read here, not many undrestand the actual mindset of the
> military when it comes to computing.
>
> the closest would be the guy who mentioned that since ports are on the
> CD's that they should be acceptable, this is in
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:23:12AM -0700, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> TWO people have written to me and said that the reason THEY write
> documentation in their "day" jobs is that they get PAID for it. So,
> excuse me! I guess real programmers only write documentation when they
> are PAID!
Yes!
> Obvi
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 05:25:42PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> It's like trying to find something in hierachically organized
> "GNU info" documentation: redundancy is useful, and try to
> find "__PRETTY_FUNCTION__" in the "gcc" documentation, when
> you need to read the man page carefully to fin
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 10:08:40PM -0400, The Anarcat wrote:
> And FreeBSD is the *vendor*? I don't think so. At least I don't hope so.
Actually we *are*. Seen those ISO's up on ftp.freebsd.org??
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:15:15PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
> Actually, it is up to us to resolve this. I don't think you understand
> how DOD operates. The vendor makes the changes, not DOD. Not the
> admin.
Sigh. If an admin cannot handle /bin/sh long enough to get /usr mounted,
they have n
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 09:20:59PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> After seeing that grep is a GNU tool, I'm almost tempted to try writing a
> BSD-style grep for the fun/exercise of it.
Rather than do that, continue the development of
/usr/ports/textproc/freegrep, which was started for exactly the
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:51:05PM -0700, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> OK, so we have beaten the psm and keyboard code to death. The entire
> point that I have been trying to make in this discussion is that it is
> imperative to document design decisions somewhere that is likely to
> survive changes in ma
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:38:56PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> Yes the sun packages installs into /bin:
> ticso@cicely22> uname -a
> SunOS cicely22 5.8 Generic_108528-01 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCclassic
> ticso@cicely22> which bash
> /bin/bash
> ticso@cicely22> file /bin/bash
> /bin/bash: ELF 3
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 05:16:28PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> I recently had a chance to buildworld on new -stable and -current machines with
> similar spec'd HW..
> The -current build was _slow_ ->
> 10756.71 real 2026.00 user 7814.64 sys
> vs -stable ->
> 2332.03 real
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 05:16:28PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> I recently had a chance to buildworld on new -stable and -current
> machines with similar spec'd HW..
> The -current build was _slow_ ->
> 10756.71 real 2026.00 user 7814.64 sys
> vs -stable ->
> 2332.03 real
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 04:51:55PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Thus spake David O'Brien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Looking at the first two lines, shouldn't it be
>
> > #define SSH_VERSION(ssh_version_get())
> > #define SSH_VERSION
Please apply the below diff. This is a FreeBSD effort, not GreenBSD. Or
should there be "GCC 2.95.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] x.y.z", "cvs 1.11.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]", etc... This isn't Linux where it is a collective of
eclectic items, rather FreeBSD is a collective.
Index: version.h
===
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:32:49PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
> > For quite a while now (?3-4 months?) one's terminal settings are messed
> > up when rlogin'ing into a FreeBSD from a FreeBSD-current one. It used to
> > be I could rlogin from an 80x24 Xterm, and the terminal settings on the
> > rem
For quite a while now (?3-4 months?) one's terminal settings are messed
up when rlogin'ing into a FreeBSD from a FreeBSD-current one. It used to
be I could rlogin from an 80x24 Xterm, and the terminal settings on the
remote box would also be 80x24. Now COLUMNS=80 and ROWS and TERMCAP
isn't set,
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 08:21:14PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 03:13:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> # On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:39:14PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> # > what was going on, and given that scp doesn't support -1, was
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:39:14PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> what was going on, and given that scp doesn't support -1, was a bit of a
> pain.
Brian, what about adding "-1" to SCP?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> installed. This would involve a repo copy of crypto/openssl/crypto/bn
> to contrib/openssl-bn or something, and I'd keep the two in sync with
> future vendor imports.
You're likely to get people saying "repo bloat". And it does seem a
little wrong
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 04:32:00PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > I am also experiencing total wedging on disk activity (vi foo, was one)
> > on a SCSI system since I updated late last week. My May 7th kernel was
> > rock solid.
>
> Was this before or after you posted publically that -CURRENT s
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 09:53:09PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> I need to know, if OpenSSH is ever going to get MFC'ed, are there any people
> currently running OpenSSH 2.9 from -CURRENT's base and getting major
> problems with it? Or even minor ones that actually make things more
701 - 800 of 1694 matches
Mail list logo
