Hi, why is this message happening with 8.1 and sometimes CURRENT ?
I tried recompiling the bootloader but the error still happens,
forcing user to hit Enter to enter manual boot.
Any takes ? :)
Many thanks,
Etienne
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mai
On 08/11/10 06:37 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote:
Hi, why is this message happening with 8.1 and sometimes CURRENT ?
I tried recompiling the bootloader but the error still happens,
forcing user to hit Enter to enter manual boot.
Any takes ? :)
Many thanks,
Etienne
Hi
$ sudo rm -rf /usr/obj/*
rm: /usr/obj/usr/local/freebsd8/src/lib32/usr/lib32/libc.so.7: Operation
not permitted
rm: /usr/obj/usr/local/freebsd8/src/lib32/usr/lib32/libcrypt.so.5:
Operation not permitted
rm: /usr/obj/usr/local/freebsd8/src/lib32/usr/lib32/libthr.so.3:
Operation not permitted
On 12/09/10 07:57, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:38:38 -0500, Etienne Robillard
wrote:
Hi
$ sudo rm -rf /usr/obj/*
rm: /usr/obj/usr/local/freebsd8/src/lib32/usr/lib32/libc.so.7: Operation
not permitted
rm: /usr/obj/usr/local/freebsd8/src/lib32/usr/lib32/libcrypt.so.5
piled with IEEE_DEBUG ?
I would also like knowing which wireless NIC you're using. Is this bug
related to
a USB wireless card ? I have similar issues (recurring) on Freebsd 8.1.
my current understanding
is that USB wireless on FreeSD is somewhat a itchy business..
Regards
--
Etienne Robill
Hi,
Any ideas why the bootloader prints a 'error: stack overflow' message
and request
user confirmation to load the kernel manually?
$ uname -a
FreeBSD marina.localdomain 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #1: Wed
Feb 16 03:38:23 EST 2011
root@:/usr/local/freebsd8/src/sys/amd64/compil
On 02/25/2011 07:31, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
On Friday, February 25, 2011 12:47:12 Etienne Robillard wrote:
On 25/02/11 06:18 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
On Friday, February 25, 2011 11:03:04 Etienne Robillard wrote:
On 25/02/11 04:11 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote
On 02/03/11 11:47 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 02, 2011 11:00:26 am Etienne Robillard wrote:
>
>> On 02/25/2011 07:31, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, February 25, 2011 12:47:12 Etienne Robillard wrote:
>>>
>>&g
(random) page faults with the run(4) driver as
well but since I don't use a driver
requiring a external firmware to be loaded, I would prefer fixing the
errors in the generic
wireless code happening unconditionally with run(4), rt2870, and
possibly urtw(4). Plus,
a external firmware seems not nec
On 03/03/11 06:42 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 03 March 2011 12:26:20 Etienne Robillard wrote:
>
>> On 03/03/11 02:45 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>
>>>>>> I forwarded this thread on -current.
>>>>>>
>>&g
On 03/03/11 08:25 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 03 March 2011 14:07:52 Etienne Robillard wrote:
>
>> ieee80211_newstate_cb
>>
> Hi,
>
> I think the problem is in the ieee80211 layer not draining its taskqueues
> properly and/or other activities
ethernet based nics) so that no ones get
hurt being
a WLAN (802.11ng ethernet-class) subcarrier ?
--
Etienne Robillard
Company: Green Tea Hackers Club
Occupation: Software Developer (and CEO)
E-mail: e...@gthcfoundation.org
Work phone: 450-936-2123
Website (Company): https://gthc.org
On 06/03/11 09:33 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Sunday 06 March 2011 15:23:02 Etienne Robillard wrote:
>
>> Hi, as the subject line implies, can someone explains why OFDM (Orthogonal
>> Frequency Division Multiplexing) is required for running run(4) ? Is there
>>
ist point-of-view about the
harmfulness
of EMF fields; in particular the ELF/VLF frequencies as defined in OFDM,
for operating WLAN devices as 'ethernet-class subcarriers'..
Kind regards,
--
Etienne Robillard
Company: Green Tea Hackers Club
Occupation: Software Developer (and CEO)
E-ma
re one of 'those'. You are one of the conspiracy nutters.
>
> I think this guy should be blocked from this list.
>
> - Diane (VA3DB)
>
This is out-of-scope but I respect your opinion to call me a name attempting
to shed some lights on the security aspect of implict
my best bet is that VLF/ELF frequencies are using FFT (Fast Fourier
Transform) algorithm to increase compression ratio of WLAN devices
operating with OFDM-enabled hardware. If that is true then not all WLAN
devices
can do OFDM thus explaining why you could use 802.11g without it...
Origi
Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory
> You are a nutter if you believe they are chemical trails. QED
>
> P.S. Have you noticed the colours from a sprinkler in the Sun?
>
> (I will not reply to any more postings about this on freebsd-current)
> - Diane (VA3DB)
>
--
Etienne Robillar
> fences around their antennas and warning signs. The high power stuff
> is dangerous.
>
>
Its not phone lines who are the main issue, rather the radiation levels
of OFDM
ethernet class devices (including USB devices and routers) using ELF/VLF
frequencies below 30khz
as per the newer
/ELF waves ?
Thanks,
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 10:38:30AM -0500, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> my best bet is that VLF/ELF frequencies are using FFT (Fast Fourier
> Transform) algorithm to increase compression ratio of WLAN devices
No. FFT has nothing to do with this.
FFT is a mathematical tr
On 06/03/11 09:49 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> OFDM is part of 11g, 11a, and 11n (2/5ghz.)
>
> I don't understand why you're asking about it in a security context.
>
>
> Adrian
>
Approaching security can be seen with onion paradigm: True paranoids
will want
to have multiple layers of security wheth
On 06/03/11 11:31 AM, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> On 06/03/11 09:49 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> OFDM is part of 11g, 11a, and 11n (2/5ghz.)
>>
>> I don't understand why you're asking about it in a security context.
>>
>>
>> Adrian
>>
On 06/03/11 11:46 AM, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:31:00AM -0500, Etienne Robillard wrote:
>
>> On 06/03/11 09:49 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>>> OFDM is part of 11g, 11a, and 11n (2/5ghz.)
>>>
>>> I don't understan
vert the raw ELF/VLF energy
input to
a external server (the Power Server)..
could then this not require a security advisory for hardware OFDM devices
circulating in the wild to boost 802.11 'speeds' and 'ranges' ?
Thanks,
--
Etienne Robillard
Company: Green Tea Hackers Club
On 06/03/11 12:36 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Sunday 06 March 2011 18:19:31 Etienne Robillard wrote:
>
>> On 06/03/11 11:58 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>
>
>> yes, the difference with 'software OFDM' and hardware OFDM - as in
>>
On 06/03/11 12:46 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> On 06/03/11 12:36 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 06 March 2011 18:19:31 Etienne Robillard wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 06/03/11 11:58 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 06/03/11 12:36 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Sunday 06 March 2011 18:19:31 Etienne Robillard wrote:
>
>> On 06/03/11 11:58 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>
>
>> yes, the difference with 'software OFDM' and hardware OFDM - as in
>>
> X-Keywords:
>
> Content-Length: 0
>
>
just my 2 cents from a conspiracy nutter... :-)
Regards,
--
Etienne Robillard
Company: Green Tea Hackers Club
Occupation: Software Developer (and CEO)
E-mail
hat you
meant to say without the implicit assumptions you don't know what you're
doing.
--
Etienne Robillard
Company: Green Tea Hackers Club
Occupation: Software Developer (and CEO)
E-mail: e...@gthcfoundation.org
Work phone: 450-936-2123
Website (Company): https://gthc.org/
Website
ur brain reacting
to cognitive dissonance in
a bizarre way so please quit trolling if you cannot second your comments
with arguments and not
opinions.
Google "cognitive dissonance" for more info...
Cheers!
The truth is in the semantics of the language -:)
--
Etienne Robillard
Compan
ike suggesting Aleksandr a patch to add a
'WITHOUT_OFDM' and/or 'WITHOUT_FIRMWARE'
option to disable compiling any BSD licensed driver code related to OFDM
without the user
explicit consent.
kind regards,
--
Etienne Robillard
Company: Green Tea Hackers Club
eBSD unless
it requires a hardware firmware module as in run(4), and unless there's
a way to skip
compiling hardware-assisted modules in FreeBSD using the
WITHOUT_FIRMWARE option.
Likewise, a WITHOUT_OFDM patch for FreeBSD could be ported nicely to
OpenBSD... :)
Etienne
--
Etienne Robillard
have done technical errors but i do not drink in the morning!! :)
On 22/03/11 06:30 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> So I'm curious - what exactly about OFDM do you have a problem with?
>
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> On 22 March 2011 18:23, Etienne Robillard <mailto:e...@gthcf
pise, we don't believe in it at all."
-- Noam Chomsky
--
Etienne Robillard
Green Tea Hackers Club
E-mail: [4]e...@gthcfoundation.org
Work phone: 1 (514) 962-7703
Website:[5]https://gthc.org/
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth beco
linux.ko
acer %
Regards,
Rene
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Etienne Robillard
Green Tea Ha
ble at ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/freebsd/ktrace.out
You'll need a amd64 machine to kdump it.
Note that nothing user-visible happens when I start thunderbird.
Regards,
Rene
2010/8/2 Etienne Robillard:
a kernel backtrace would be a nice visual aid to debug!!!
Cheers,
Etienne
René Ladan w
st be the GENERIC kernel, it is attached for completeness.
Rene
2010/8/3 Etienne Robillard :
Please show us the kernel config too. It compiles and runs
without side effects on FreeBSD 8.1 (GENERIC) and native gcc...
cheers!
Etienne
On 08/02/10 17:18, René Ladan wrote:
Fair enough.
36 matches
Mail list logo
