On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 2:35 AM John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote this message on Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 18:29 +0800:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:14 AM John-Mark Gurney
> wrote:
> >
> > > Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote this message on Sun, Jul 26, 2020 a
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:14 AM John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote this message on Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:05 +0800:
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:13 AM John-Mark Gurney
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'd like peopl
device on USB2?
I will try to test it in a couple of days on NanoPI R1 and R1S boards.
thanks,
Ganbold
>
> Thanks.
>
> [0] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25809
>
> --
> John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 557
ks in
> advance.
>
https://dan.langille.org/2015/01/10/bacula-on-freebsd-with-zfs/
Ganbold
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy
> ___
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>
rs/maintainers on
some irc channel.
Not sure about Tegra or PowerVR.
Ganbold
>
>
> On Thursday, January 29, 2015, Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Lundberg, Johannes <
>> johan...@brilliantservice.co.jp> wrote:
is closer to what I want spec-wise..
>
> http://www.variscite.com/products/system-on-module-som/cortex-a15-krait/var-som-sd600-cpu-qualcomm-snapdragon600
>
>
>
I think IFC6410 has same SoC as above SoM and as for ifc6410 either mmc/sd
or usb ehci driver needed in order t
xpensive.
Another options could be Freescale SoC boards like wandboard, phytec Cosmic
board etc.
hope this helps,
Ganbold
>
> Should I buy it? If not, what is the BEST recommendation?
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
> Nairobi,KE
> +25473374412
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote:
> Zbigniew,
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Zbigniew Bodek wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I would like to present a patch for ns8250 serial that I would like to
>> commit in the near future (if th
ole (115200,n,8,1)
In case of RK3188 SoC, it seems booting FreeBSD kernel seems very fragile,
not sure yet what is causing the problem.
Even with stock ns8250 some version later than r254983 didn't show/print
anything on serial console few days ago.
Only thing so far I know is this r2
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 01:57:03PM +0800, Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Konstantin Belousov
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:52:35PM +0800, Ganbold
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:52:35PM +0800, Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to boot HEAD after updating, but unfortunately it panics with
> > following message:
> >
> >
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:52:35PM +0800, Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to boot HEAD after updating, but unfortunately it panics with
> > following message:
> >
> >
Hi,
I'm trying to boot HEAD after updating, but unfortunately it panics with
following message:
panic: kmem_suballoc: bad status return of 3.
I was only able to get image of the panic.
http://www.mnbsd.org/ganbold/IMG_20130420_222353-2.jpg
Does anybody see same panic booting on i386 l
t;compiling ports" feature, because I can
> only cross-compile word/kernel and I didn't know how to cross-compile
> ports.
I have done some nanobsd related changes (without ports) locally for RS
PRO 6 months ago, not sure how it is useful now.
But it could be easier to modify
PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: PseudoCylon
>> To: Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
>> Cc: Ganbold ; freebsd-current@freebsd.org
>> Sent: Tue, July 6, 2010 12:26:58 AM
>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wirele
AK-san,
On 7/5/2010 4:10 PM, PseudoCylon wrote:
>>>>> From: Ganbold
>>>>> To: PseudoCylon
>>>>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
>>>>> Sent: Wed, June 16, 2010 6:33:47 AM
>>>>> Subjec
AK-san,
PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>>> From: Ganbold
>>> To: PseudoCylon
>>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
>>> Sent: Wed, June 16, 2010 6:33:47 AM
>>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST
se key. Maybe, macbook doesn't like mixing the mode. So,
> please
> tcpdump -vvv -xxx -i wlan0 'arp'
> and check if any packet with address of all 'ff'. is sent/received alright.
> All 'ff 'means using group key. Others use pairwise key. All 'f
very beginning to the modem hang:
http://pastebin.com/1ALmV7mA
> and check if any packet with address of all 'ff'. is sent/received alright.
> All 'ff 'means using group key. Others use pairwise key. All 'ff is easy to
> see in output of tcpdump. Or, you can
, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Reply 192.168.1.1
is-at 00:30:54:62:3d:24 (oui Unknown), length 46
0x: 0026 bb17 f661 0030 5462 3d24 0806 0001
0x0010: 0800 0604 0002 0030 5462 3d24 c0a8 0101
0x0020: 0026 bb17 f661 c0a8 0132
0x0030: 000
AK-san,
PseudoCylon wrote:
>>>> From: Ganbold
>>>> To: PseudoCylon
>>>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
>>>> Sent: Thu, June 10, 2010 10:53:30 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wirele
AK-san,
PseudoCylon wrote:
>>>> From: Ganbold
>>>> To: PseudoCylon
>>>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
>>>> Sent: Thu, June 10, 2010 10:53:30 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wirele
AK-san,
PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Ganbold
>> To: PseudoCylon
>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
>> Sent: Thu, June 10, 2010 10:53:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wirele
problem so far, no more adsl
modem problem.
I can see arp packets in wlan0 interface as well as in macbook.
I will continue testing and let you know if there comes any problem.
thanks again,
Ganbold
> AK
>
>
>
>
--
Let us treat men and women well; Treat them as if they wer
AK-san,
PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Ganbold
>> To: PseudoCylon
>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
>> Sent: Wed, May 26, 2010 10:10:46 AM
>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wirele
AK-san,
PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Ganbold
>> To: PseudoCylon
>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
>> Sent: Wed, May 26, 2010 10:10:46 AM
>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wirele
AK-san,
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:57 PM, PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
> > From: Ganbold
> > To: PseudoCylon
> > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu >
> > Sent: Wed, May 26, 2010 10:10:46 AM
> > Subject: Re: CALL for TEST
several
arp request to wireless client ADSL modem stops responding (had to
restart modem).
Any idea?
thanks,
Ganbold
PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Ganbold
>> To: PseudoCylon
>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
>&g
PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Ganbold
>> To: PseudoCylon
>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
>> Sent: Mon, May 3, 2010 8:54:11 AM
>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless
>>
PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Ganbold
>> To: PseudoCylon
>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
>> Sent: Sun, April 25, 2010 1:44:20 AM
>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless
>
6:bb:17:f6:61 authorized=1
wlan0: STA 00:26:bb:17:f6:61 IEEE 802.1X: authorizing port
wlan0: STA 00:26:bb:17:f6:61 RADIUS: starting accounting session
4BDEE104-
bsd_sta_clear_stats: addr=00:26:bb:17:f6:61
wlan0: STA 00:26:bb:17:f6:61 WPA: pairwise key handshake completed (R
xc7e56358: not in kernel
0+c7e56358 (?,?,?,?) ra 0 sp c7967aa8 sz 0
pid 11
db>
thanks,
Ganbold
> Thanks
> AK
>
>
>> Got another panic. Maybe it is
>> something else.
>>
>> run_rx_frame: rx done
>> run_rx_frame: rx done
>> run_rx_frame: rx
ra 800ae4d8 sp c7e83a50 sz 24
800ae3d0+108 (?,?,?,?) ra 80208060 sp c7e83a68 sz 424
kdb_trap+108 (?,?,?,?) ra 80407624 sp c7e83c10 sz 32
trap+ff4 (?,?,?,?) ra 803ff090 sp c7e83c30 sz 168
MipsKernGenException+134 (1a3,0,0,21c) ra c7e5bd24 sp c7e83cd8 sz 200
PC 0xc7e5bd24: not in kernel
0+c7e5bd24
,?,?) ra 8018f174 sp c79679c8 sz 56
_cv_wait+1f0 (?,?,?,?) ra 80147ba8 sp c7967a00 sz 64
usbd_do_request_flags+540 (?,?,?,?) ra c7e5629c sp c7967a40 sz 104
PC 0xc7e5629c: not in kernel
0+c7e5629c (?,?,?,?) ra 0 sp c7967aa8 sz 0
pid 11
db>
Ganbold
> Thanks
> AK
>
>
>>> Is
error (load or I-fetch) - kernel mode)
[ thread pid 14 tid 100028 ]
Stopped at ieee80211_node_attach+0x400:lw v0,24(v0)
db>
...
Ganbold
> Thanks
> AK
>
>
>>> Is your kernel compiled with INVARIANTS
>>> option?
>>>
>>>
0
protmode CTS wme dtimperiod 1 -dfs
rspro#
I will observe more and let you know if there is anything.
Please let me know if you need any more information.
thanks a lot,
Ganbold
> Thanks
> AK
>
>
>>> Is your kernel compiled with INVARIANTS
>>> option?
>&g
() of spin mutex arge mii lock @
/usr/mysrc/sys/mips/atheros/if_arge.c:554
thanks,
Ganbold Ts
> AK
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Ganbold
>> To: PseudoCylon
>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
>> Sent: Tue, April 6, 2010 7:29:16 AM
PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Ganbold
>> To: PseudoCylon
>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
>> Sent: Wed, March 31, 2010 8:08:29 AM
>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless
>>
>> Does stoc
PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>
>> From: Ganbold
>> To: PseudoCylon
>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
>> Sent: Sat, March 27, 2010 7:01:32 AM
>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless
>>
>> JFY
PseudoCylon wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>
>> From: Ganbold
>> To: PseudoCylon
>> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
>> Sent: Sat, March 27, 2010 7:01:32 AM
>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless
>>
>> JFY
PseudoCylon wrote:
>>> Same.
>>>
>
>
JFYI, I have just tested if_run and works fine on HEAD (i386).
But on RouterStation Pro it still has problem with your patch.
Ganbold
>>>
>>> rspro# ifconfig wlan0 up
>>>
>&g
wme bintval 0
rspro# ifconfig wlan0 up
run_stop: All Tx cleared
run_newstate: INIT -> SCAN
rspro# Trap cause = 5 (address error (store) - kernel mode)
[ thread pid 0 tid 100047 ]
Stopped at ieee80211_radiotap_vdetach+0x70:sh v1,0(a0)
db>
Ganbold
> Regards,
50 :
997c :
9a08 :
00009bf4 :
rspro#
Ganbold
>
>
> AK
>
>
>> Same.
>>
>
>
>> rspro# ifconfig wlan0 up
>>
>> rspro# Trap cause = 5 (address error (store) - kernel mode)
>> [ thread pid 0 tid 100047 ]
>> Stopped at
,?,?,?) ra 803b97c8 sp c7ec9c08 sz 176
MipsKernGenException+10c (c0f6a637,c0f721c8,c7ea7c04,e51) ra 802c95b8 sp
c7ec9cb8 sz 200
802c95a8+10 (?,?,?,?) ra 0 sp c7ec9d80 sz 0
pid 0
db>
Ganbold
> Does your mips use big endian?
>
> AK
>
>
>
> Tried this version on routerstation pr
ec9990) ra 803c26a0 sp c7ec9be0 sz 40
trap+135c (?,?,?,?) ra 803b97c8 sp c7ec9c08 sz 176
MipsKernGenException+10c (c0f6a62f,c0f72268,c7ea7c14,e51) ra 802c95b8 sp
c7ec9cb8 sz 200
802c95a8+10 (?,?,?,?) ra 0 sp c7ec9d80 sz 0
pid 0
db>
Btw, ifconfig wlan0 up works on with stock run(4) which was comm
45 matches
Mail list logo