On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Have you given up on your grep implementation? :-)
>
> Quite a few folks were really looking forward to it.
The big objection to it was it was not as fast as GNU Grep. A few times,
I've trimmed a few cycles here and there, but it is still 1/2 the spee
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
> > So if someone were willing to take over the lot and manage them as Ports,
> > how would anyone feel about this?
> >
> > FreeGrep uses the FreeBSD build style and is easily a Port. I could
> > Port-ify the entire directory in, say, two days. Anyone in
As a quick follow up, the PR database shows between fifteen and twenty
PRs relating to src/games.
Also, if this happened, should fortune be treated differently and
moved into src/usr.bin? Or should it become a port?
Jamie
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 09:58 PM, James Howard wrote:
>
So if someone were willing to take over the lot and manage them as Ports,
how would anyone feel about this?
FreeGrep uses the FreeBSD build style and is easily a Port. I could
Port-ify the entire directory in, say, two days. Anyone interested?
Jamie
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 09:41 PM,
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> This patch adds the "prompt" and "passwd_prompt" fields to the
> /etc/login.conf, which makes lgoin more like getty in its ability
> to be configured.
Cool, I used to hack mine by hand to look like OpenVMS...
Jamie
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Kai Voigt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm just doing a cvsup update of my system and -as many times before- I
> realize that /usr/ports/ takes a lot of time and also disk space to sync.
>
> # du -sk /usr/ports
> 71118 /usr/ports
>
> Am I the only one being little annoyed by this
Would someone please look at kern/14217 to maybe be included in
4.0-STABLE? I know, I should have asked last week but it just occurred to
me now.
Thank you, Jamie
--
Jamie Howard
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> yes. sorry about the confusion, i forgot to mention that.
> Allaire off-record said that they aren't happy with Linux
> and are seeking an alternative. i seem to be pushing
> them towards FreeBSD. but, keep in mind, this will be a
> huge shift in d
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:
> Can't we do both? Use gzip on the install floppy, but include
> bzip2 in /usr/src, and make sure that all the various programs that
> deal with tarballs and gzip'ed tarballs can also deal with bzip2
> tarballs (including in the ports system)?
>
On Sun, 26 Dec 1999, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Yes, but isn't this stuff GPL'd? The fsck_ext2fs program from Open- or
> > NetBSD is not.
>
> Sure. So is ext2fs for FreeBSD, and some other small programs like gcc.
Is the ext2fs implementation in Net or Open GPL'd? If not, copy it too.
Jamie
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Max Khon wrote:
> I know about this beast. It would be nice if our out-of-box grep had
> this option.
Hah, it used to. I modeled it exactly on it (option-wise). BTW, if you
do choose to use it, get it soon. I submitted a PR yesterday for my
newest version. It is a faster,
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Max Khon wrote:
> hi, there!
>
> it is not possible to make short equivalent for old grep -a option
> (as in grep 2.3 -a is used for other purposes).
> it is possible to make a long option (--skip-binary) but long options
> are quite unusable. GREP_OPTIONS cannot help much
>
On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 04:36:12PM -0500, a little birdie told me
> that James Howard remarked
> > On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > >
> > > [15:25:53] mortis:~
> > > (ttyp9):{838}% ll -i `whi
On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 04:09:11PM -0500, a little birdie told me
> that Bakul Shah remarked
> >
> > Enigma is just a format converter at this point and should be
> > left around (after renaming it crypt -- which is how it is
> > known on all Unix v
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> >It strikes me that having the base system be slightly more decomposed
> > could be advantageous. It would be great to be able to do something like:
> >
> >pkg_delete lp
> >pkg_delete yp
> >
> >Has anyone done/tried th
On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
> Is there anyone who is experienced Netscape crashes with 4.0-CURRENT when
> the close button is pressed (not always, but very often) ?
> It happens to me with 4.61 and 4.70 , it doesn't happen with 3.2-STABLE I
> have at work.
I have had probl
16 matches
Mail list logo
