Re: new rc system

2003-09-11 Thread James Quick
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 04:36 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:00:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: [re-ordering rc.d scripts] This is a known shortcoming in the new rc system. Luke Mewburn commented on it in a talk recently but does not yet have a satisfactory

Re: ipfw - default to accept + bootp = confusion.

2003-08-14 Thread James Quick
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 02:23 AM, Juli Mallett wrote: * James Quick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Date: 2003-08-07 ] [ w.r.t. Re: ipfw - default to accept + bootp = confusion. ] On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 12:22 AM, Juli Mallett wrote: Does someone have any idea what approach to take

Questions about stability of snapshots and vinum in 5.1

2003-08-14 Thread James Quick
My goal is to have a box, with 2 drives, each of which is identically configured. Slice 1, and Slice 2, will be smallish FreeBSD partitions 4-8 GB each. 1 will be treated as a production environment. The other will be used for building and testing new environments. The bulk of the space will be

What parts of disk geometry are relevant?

2003-08-14 Thread James Quick
I'm setting up 5.1 with a couple of new drives. Sysinstall, and for that matter, any combination of command line tools, all seem have different ideas about geometry. Sysinstall would use any of the numbers I threw at it, and even after using sysinstalls values, fdisk and bsdlabel find reasons

Re: ipfw - default to accept + bootp = confusion.

2003-08-09 Thread James Quick
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 12:22 AM, Juli Mallett wrote: Does someone have any idea what approach to take for the following scenario? I'm leaning towards a compile time failure, or an informative panic at the beginning of bootp... You have IPFIREWALL, but not the default to accept