giving extra options to dump.
How about putting this short wrapper in amanda's path?
#!/bin/sh
exec dump -L ${1+"$@"}
--
Joshua Goodall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Your object hit ratio is weak, old man"
"If you cache me now, I will du
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:40:43PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> I'd like to try out -current, however I'm not willing to clobber by working
> 4.7 install. How do build -current on 4.7p3 away from my RELENG_4_7
> source, then install to a seperate, pre-partitioned slice?
I haven't tried it, bu
flash BIOS
upgrade. This was an ASUS A7VL-VM motherboard, which appeared to do
unpleasant things to PCI IRQs.
Joshua
--
Joshua Goodall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Your byte hit ratio is weak, old man"
"If you cache me now, I will dump more core than you can possibly imagine&
the chapter.
Joshua
--
Joshua Goodall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Your byte hit ratio is weak, old man"
"If you cache me now, I will dump more core than you can possibly imagine"
Index: bin/cp/utils.c
===
RCS fi
... when I say "bad" I don't mean in execution. I mean that
the idea of a redirecting wrapper for one special program seems to
me an architectural wart that shouldn't be pushed on the userbase.
Not only does it conflict in style with the existing mailwrapper,
but it introduces a DWIM feature with
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 03:53:27PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been struggling upgrading kernel since beginning of April, and finally
> found I have to add "options LOOKUP_EXCLUSIVE" to my kernel config file.
> Without LOOKUP_EXCLUSIVE,
> - some of the processes stall in "inode" state,
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> The reason for this is that the pam code for doing the enforcement
> is being trusted utterly. In the past, we would consider both
> the primary group (the group from the passwd file entry), and the
> auxillary groups (the groups from the groups file
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 19:20:45 MST, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > Isn't this backwards? Code shouldn't be making assumptions about the
> > special meaning of numeric gids. What if you wanted to renumber gid
> > wheel to something else?
>
> So? My primary
