Craig Reyenga wrote:
One thing I noticed in previous releases is that the choice of
packages is a
little odd. Many small packages and ones that are not popular seem to make
it on the first CD, while bigger and/or more popular ones are stuck being
fetched+built manually after. This can be a pain
Dan Nelson wrote:
I think 8 years of warnings is more than enough :)
I agree with you that it ought to be. Personally I think people that
still use "#include " should be forced to write out "#include
" 1000 times, then eat the paper. However, it is an imperfect
universe. ;)
Out of the ~710
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
..com>, "local.freebsd.current" writes:
>That sounds like "it's time to ship so we're going to ship".
That's it.
>I'm not trying to get up anyone's nose here, but aren't there
>objective release criteria?
yes: "No more delays" :-)
I th
Terry Lambert wrote:
If a legacy application stops working because a system changes,
it's the fault of the system doing the changing, not the fault of
the people back in 1984 who didn't know ANSI was going to bung-up
the C language until their application no longer worked.
There has to be some a
