On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:55:29PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote
>
> >You get that error from what command(s)? Have you tried with 5.2,
> >which has a new ATA driver?
> >
> >Kris
> >
> >
> I usually "discover" that I am h
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hello
>
> What follows is a description of a problem I used to have when running
> FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. I am not running FreeBSD right now, but I am
> considering going back to it but I need to figure out how to prevent
> this issue
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:44:16AM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote:
> Nothing specific. I suppose it's just a space-time tradeoff from my
> point of view. With disk sizes what they are today (most of my systems
> have a system disk size of 40 GB or more), in my environment reducing
> the root filesystem
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:22:16AM +0100, Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running CURRENT and set up a jail where I want to install SUN JDK
> 1.4.2. In the process, linux emulation needs to be installed. While
> installing emulators/linux_base, I get the following:
>
> ==
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:33:42PM -, Lawrence Farr wrote:
>
> I've just tried this again, and noticed an error message that I'd
> missed:
> install -p -m 555 -o root -g wheel kernel /boot/kernel
> *** Signal 12
This usually means you've tried to update something out of the correct
order.
K
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:46:55PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this a known issue on 5.2 beta 6 sup'ed nov 29/03?
Yes, it's reported on a daily basis and is harmless.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 04:03:20PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031129 15:55] wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > We are badly overflowing the disc1 release ISO with packages, and need
> > to trim it down. One package that could easily get axed is the
> > linux-netscape-
vered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 23:48:12 +0100
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: gettimeofday() test code
In-reply-to: "Your message of Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:21:24 PST."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > > That is very, very bad. I wish we had some kind of ports QA team :(
> &g
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 04:43:44PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [29/11/03 16:23]:
> > > over and over and over -- it makes the console essentially unusable.
> >
> > I think you're running into problems that have been fixed
mode ---
db>
Kris
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 12:58:01PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> One of my sparc64 package machines (running -current from Nov 21) died
> overnight with the following:
>
> recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) vnode interlock @
> /var/portbuild/sparc64/
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:25:08PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> All openldapXX-server ports do this for example
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/db/pkg grep /etc/rc.d */+CONTEN*
> [...]
> openldap-server-2.1.23/+CONTENTS:@unexec /etc/rc.d/slapd stop 2>&1 >/dev/null || true
> openldap-server-2.1.23/+CO
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I can't recommend doing it this way, since some ports I know
> > are writing startup scripts to /etc/rc.d :-/
>
> That is very, very bad. I wish we had some kind of ports QA team :
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 04:07:44PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> A couple days ago, I downloaded 20031116-JPSNAP to install on a new system
> -- this box had been running 5.1-R without issues for some time, but wasn't
> doing anything particular, and I had mucked up the 5.1 -> 5.2 upgrade
> (statfs
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:23:42AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 03:38:59PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 12:27:53AM +0100, Artur Poplawski wrote:
> >
> >> > lock order reversal
> >> > 1st 0xc43d8ad4
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:32:28AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Saturday 29 November 2003 09:19, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > Are all affected machines multi-processor?
>
> None. Both are i386 UP (although the 4.9-RELEASE box is r
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:22:03AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> Hello FreeBSD-world,
>
> Can someone offer some advise on how I can shoot myself on the foot by
> installing 5.2-BETA via cvsup? What tag.
No tag, just cvsup -current as normal.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 07:04:16AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Saturday 29 November 2003 05:57, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > as to ntpd/timed ... don't run either ... run ntpdate twice a day (11:59
> >
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 12:36:22AM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Hardware for the above is a Dual-Xeon, 4Gig of RAM, and about 421
> processes running on it currently ... kernel config is at the bottom, but
> I don't think there is anything 'abnormal' about it ... and note that I've
> had other
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 10:36:00PM -0500, T Kellers wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 10:19 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >
> > You can't force the driver to detect your soundcard if the driver
> > doesn't detect it :-)
> >
> > If you have a su
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 10:00:53PM -0500, T Kellers wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 09:46 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:40:57PM -0500, T Kellers wrote:
> > > I searched the list archive, but I didn't see anything specific to this
> >
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> In trying to isolate an issue where the PostgreSQL 'explain analyze' is
> showing "odd results" (namely, negative time estimates on queries), Tom
> Lane wrote a quick C program to test gettimeofday() (program attached) ...
> the
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:40:57PM -0500, T Kellers wrote:
> I searched the list archive, but I didn't see anything specific to this
> question.
>
> Dell Latitude C600, running 5.2-BETA from 11/24/2003...
>
> I didn't notice until I started up KDE that I had no /dev/dsp of any kind in
> my /dev
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:37:49PM -0500, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Checked the archive and didn't see this one listed yet:
>
> lock order reversal
> ?1st?0xc4047134?filedesc?structure?(filedesc?structure)[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]/usr/src/sys/kern/sys_
> generic.c:896
> ?2nd?0xc0956a80?Giant?(Giant)[EMA
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 03:25:02PM +0100, Ruben de Groot wrote:
>
> This is on a machine running 5.2-BETA, compiled with last night's
> sources
Both problems are known and have been reported a number of times..the
second one should be fixed now.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:00:54PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:16:05PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > > It did not crash or anything, but the following is printed on
> > > console now (addresses ommitted):
> > >
> > > lock order reversal
> > >1st ... UMA l
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 12:27:53AM +0100, Artur Poplawski wrote:
> > lock order reversal
> > 1st 0xc43d8ad4 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1323
> > 2nd 0xc098cf60 swap_pager swhash (swap_pager swhash) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pag
> > er.c:1838
> > 3rd 0xc10368c4 vm object (v
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 01:02:18PM +0400, rihad wrote:
> CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe
>
> I'll try to build it without -O2, thanks.
*sigh*, I see we need more figlet in the documentation.
# CFLAGS controls the compiler settings used when compiling C code.
# Note that optimization settings above -O (-O2, .
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:59:16AM +0400, rihad wrote:
> For a few past days, after doing make update, buildworld always fails
> when building "pam". Couldn't find it on this list! TIA
Sorry, my telepathy helmet needs a new potato, so you'll have to help
me out here.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Descript
I'm still getting these on bento (SMP machine) after upgrading to
-current.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:15:58PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :> is the path you've chosen to go then you have an obligation not to
> :> tear out major existing system capabilities, such as the ability to
> :> generate static binaries, in the process.
> :
> :If this is what you t
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:39:11PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> So, yes, I do think you guys are being lazy in that regard. If this
> is the path you've chosen to go then you have an obligation not to
> tear out major existing system capabilities, such as the ability to
> genera
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 07:36:45PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What _REAL WORLD_ task does this slow down?
>
> I suspect 'make world' takes a serious hit.
It does not (Warner has quoted numbers a few times now).
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Descri
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:52:54PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>
> Am 24.11.2003 um 22:19 schrieb Kris Kennaway:
>
> >On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> >>This is with a current from around two days ago, with a kernel not
> >&g
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> This is with a current from around two days ago, with a kernel not much
> different from GENERIC.
Known problem.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
One of my sparc64 package machines (running -current from Nov 21) died
overnight with the following:
recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) vnode interlock @
/var/portbuild/sparc64/src-client/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_ihash.c:128
first acquired @ /var/portbuild/sparc64/src-client/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_ihas
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 03:16:06PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> I end up with the following when I run `make world` on 5.1-RELEASE-p10.
Did you read UPDATING?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 03:16:06PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> I end up with the following when I run `make world` on 5.1-RELEASE-p10.
Did you read UPDATING?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 09:10:54AM -, Lawrence Farr wrote:
> I have an up to date SMP machine with an Intel 10/100
> card and fxp driver. The machine has started to
> panic during running make release, and when it does, the
> intel card floods the network and pretty much wipes it out.
> ie no m
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 11:40:37PM +0100, Jimmy Selgen wrote:
> The box in question is my workstation, so I guess i'm not passing that
> much traffic through ipfilter. Also, when I said that the NIC still
> worked, I might have mislead you a bit. I had about 5-10 timeouts while
> scp'ing the dmesg
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:08:13PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Since both of these happen in irq handlers, you might want to look at the
> new random entropy gathering use of locking.
I'm running a kernel with dev/random backed out to the day before
mark's commits, because at the time I needed to
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:22:49PM +0100, Jimmy Selgen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm getting some strange xl0 timeout messages on 5.1-CURRENT (synced
> today).
>
> I've searched the archives, and it seems that this problem is related to
> ACPI
> (http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=608457+0+archiv
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:31:23PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 20-Nov-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I updated bento last night, and it panicked after a few hours with:
> >
> > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> > cpuid = 0; apic id = 01
>
I updated bento last night, and it panicked after a few hours with:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 01
fault virtual address = 0xe5
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc052e219
stack pointer = 0
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 01:53:28PM -0600, Cosmin Stroe wrote:
> Here is the stack backtrace:
>
> lock order reversal
> 1st 0xc1da318c vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1323
> 2nd 0xc0724900 swap_pager swhash (swap_pager swhash) @
> /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1838
> 3rd 0xc
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:57:08PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Apparently, the ncurses version in the base system is 5.2, while there
> is a newer 5.3 port available.
>
> Would it make sense to import the 5.3 ncurses into the base system?
Perhaps, once FreeBSD 5.2 is released. A committer ne
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:44:35PM +, Mark Dixon wrote:
> On Friday 14 Nov 2003 08:33, Matt Smith wrote:
> >
> > And gnomevfs was something I saw in another headsup. There are bound to
> > be others, I'm just keeping an eye on my /var/log/messages to see if
> > anything else sig 11 or 12's! So
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:26:00PM +0100, Julian Stacey wrote:
> Bill Vermillion wrote:
> > I would think that instead of NO_DYNAMICROOT root in make.conf,
> > a varialbe of DYNAMICROOT be used with the default of building
> > static, and having the option of building dynamic for those
> > who nee
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:51:49AM -0500, Anthony Schneider wrote:
> This isn't *totally* the case. :)
>
> My problem is that in upgrading from 5.1-RELEASE to -CURRENT today,
> installworld fails at installing "test" with (hand copied):
Except we weren't talking about buildworld - sorry to hear y
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:41:04AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Give setiathome a try! You'll be astonished. And I'm sure the difference I
> _feel_ isn't dependend on kde. If you don't like kde replace it with our
> favourite wm/desktop. But you won't be able to play two mid to high-quali
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:37:47PM -0500, Bill Vermillion wrote:
> One thing I always liked of the FBSD approach as opposed to others
> is to make ever tool that might possible be needed in a system
> recovery static so if it was there it would work.
How about you take a look at what is actually
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:39:17PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> # cd /usr/src ; cvs -qR up -PdA
> ...
> U sys/netgraph/bluetooth/include/ng_btsocket_hci_raw.h
> U sys/netgraph/bluetooth/include/ng_btsocket_l2cap.h
> U sys/netgraph/bluetooth/include/ng_btsocket_rfcomm.h
> panic: Assertion td->td_tu
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:19:24AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway writes:
>
> ># dumpon /dev/ccd0b
> >dumpon: ioctl(DIOCSKERNELDUMP): Invalid argument
> >
> >Why doesn't this work?
>
> Because
# dumpon /dev/ccd0b
dumpon: ioctl(DIOCSKERNELDUMP): Invalid argument
Why doesn't this work?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:02:57PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> If it's of significance I'm running vinum to mirror my /, /usr, and
> swap partitions.
There have been quite a few vinum PRs coming in lately, so this is a
likely candidate. A gdb backtrace is needed to go much further
though.
Kris
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:10:46AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thoughts?
Don't install or kldload your debugging modules, there's no need. You
can just load them into gdb if you need to read a core.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 06:36:17PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> hammer02 died after a few minutes of idling with:
>
> panic: Assertion TD_IS_RUNNING(td) failed at
> /a/asami/portbuild/amd64/src-client/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:687
> Debugger("panic")
> Stopped a
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:05:51PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> Or maybe the real problem is that we claim that there will
> be no API/ABI changes after X.0-RELEASE, and we've really
> missed that mark with 5.0-RELEASE, for a variety of reasons.
Where do we claim that?
All I'm aware of is t
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 10:42:44PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> Mathew Kanner has developed the new version of the midi framework,
> based on kobj(9) and buildable as a module. As the first step to
> replace the midi driver, the conventional one is removed from the
> kernel in a minute.
>
> Mat
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of
> >free space!
> >
> >enigma# df -k
> >Filesystem 1K-blocks
...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of
free space!
enigma# df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/da0a 205434 123332 6566865%/
devfs 11 0 100%/dev
/dev/d
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:09:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 hierarchy
> cd /usr/src/etc;make distrib-dirs
> mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p /
>
>
> That's where it hangs, any help?
Which process is running? What sta
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:08:55PM -0500, David Hill wrote:
> Hello -
>
>
> I seem to not be able to get the IP address of a site. I am
> guessing its an issue with gethostbyname() and have a - at the end of
> the hostname...
...which is illegal.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:36:28PM -0800, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On 07-Nov-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > So far this has happened (well, the panic above was new) on 5 separate
> > > machines that were all w
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:51:21PM +1030, Alex Wilkinson wrote:
> Not sure how to interpret these errors on the console ??
>
> Running: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #4: Thu Nov 6 16:49:21 CST 2003
Part of a backtrace from an error detected by WITNESS. There was more
above that that you didn't post.
Kr
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:32:57PM -0500, Jason wrote:
> Ok, here is the last section of output and the error. After this if I
> do ethier gzip command I get an error, but if I enter the makeinfo
> commands first the gzip command then works. Could this be some kind of
> schedualling problem be
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 05:14:45PM -0500, ivan georgiev wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am running 5-1p10 and I wanted to try out -CURRENT. I cvsup-ed it in
> a different from /usr/src location. When I cd to that location and
> type "make buildkernel" I get:
>
> ~~
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:40:59PM -0500, Michael L. Squires wrote:
> The internal compiler error compiling R-letter (R-1.8.0) under 5-CURRENT went
> away when gcc was updated to 3.3.3.
Cool, it's good to know they're fixing bugs with those version updates :-)
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: P
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 06:05:06PM +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> ---
> panic: Most recently used by mount
I reported this the other day..tjr has a fix in his p4 branch.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 12:02:03PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> Are they any know issues with rpc.lockd under -CURRENT.
> I had a look at the gnats database and did not find anything related.
> I'm asking this because I have a lot of:
> kernel: pid 70065 (rpc.lockd), uid 0: exited on
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:36:28PM -0800, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On 07-Nov-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > So far this has happened (well, the panic above was new) on 5 separate
> > > machines that were all w
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:10:07AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 error=40
> ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 error=40
> ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left)
> ata0: resetting devices ..
> ad0: FAILURE - already active DMA on th
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 07:33:41PM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > 1) All my drives have performed mass suicide at once
>
> You know, with deathstar's you cant really rule that out :)
:-)
> > Furthermore, I'd like to know why the panic occurred above.
>
> Is this on a brand new -current ? lots
Since upgrading the bento package machines to -current I am getting
a lot of the following errors:
ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 error=40
For example:
ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 error=40
ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 error=40
ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51 error=40
ad0: FAILURE
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:19:53AM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> Clearly. :-)
> I should have mentioned that it is not in the Makefile or in variables
> defined through /etc/make.conf. (I was using gmake for this). It seems
> to be wired somewhere else.
There just aren't many possibilitie
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:43:43PM -0800, Aditya wrote:
> debug1: Connections to local port 8000 forwarded to remote address
> www.freebsd.org:80
> debug1: Local forwarding listening on 127.0.0.1 port 8000.
> bind: Can't assign requested address
> channel_setup_fwd_listener: cannot liste
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 03:10:49PM +1030, Alex Wilkinson wrote:
> CVSup'd today [Thu Nov 6 15:09:02 CST 2003].
>
> buildkernel fails on a warning.
Wasn't this fixed this morning?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:18:43AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> One of the amd64 machines died with the following. The kernel is a
> few weeks old, so this might already be fixed.
>
> Kris
>
> malloc() of "64" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
> exclu
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 08:36:38AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A few days ago I lost some files in /usr/src/gnu and erased /usr/src/gnu/*
> cvsuped to recover the files and now my build world stops in
>
> sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 strfile
> /usr/obj/usr/src/i3
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:55:46PM +0100, John Angelmo wrote:
> >This was already resolved. Java does a dlopen() on /usr/lib/libc.so.
> >Rumor has it that this is fixed.
> >
> >Scott
>
> But still after importing e_scalb.c or e_scalbf.c and rebuilding gives
> me this:
>
>
> cc -fpic -DPIC -O
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 11:48:13PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : To respond to myself, I got ahold of a 4.8 libm.so and made sure that the
> : linker used it. No change in the problem, and it still hints that
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 08:08:08PM -0800, SteAltH FanThoM wrote:
> yes it does!
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
>
> 21.4.2 Check /etc/make.conf
>
> Examine the files /etc/defaults/make.conf and /etc/make.conf. The first
> contains some default defines
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:03:38PM -0800, SteAltH FanThoM wrote:
> I am running 5-current the last cvs i did " 12.30 pm. today CST "
> failed on buildworld with this.
>
> ===> gnu/usr.bin/cvs/doc
> makeinfo --no-split -I /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/doc -I
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/doc/../../../.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:07:09PM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Matt wrote:
> > I'm now running a kernel/world of October 26th on both NFS client and
> > server machines. I am still seeing NFS lockups as reported by several
> > people in these threads:
> >
> > http://docs.freebsd.org/c
One of the amd64 machines died with the following. The kernel is a
few weeks old, so this might already be fixed.
Kris
malloc() of "64" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
exclusive sleep mutex mntvnode r = 0 (0x80758220) locked @
/a/asami/portbuild/amd64/src-client/sys/ufs/ffs
Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
- Forwarded message from pecquetj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>Number: 58581
>Category: kern
>Synopsis: System call hang 5.x triggered by gnunetd
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:free
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:40:29PM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:07:11PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> > > I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with
&
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 11:37:56AM +0100, "Branko F. Gra?nar" wrote:
> Hi.
>
> FreeBSD 5.1-p10 (and also possible other 5.1-pX version) can be remotely
> locked up if the following criteria is met:
>
> + apache2 has mod_ssl loaded and enabled
> + apache2 has the following configuration directives
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 02:53:44PM +1300, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
> Hi There,
> Any time I try to install my 5.1 current version I have got this error:
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.5" not found
> and I need install all again
> someone can help me please
It sounds like you've
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with
> the libm fix from a few days ago). It does not look good; possibly an
> issue with both the compat libc and native libc being linked in? Maybe
> libm.so is stil
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 04:15:00PM -0700, Stephane Raimbault wrote:
> I followed the instructions found in the handbook.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-advanced.html
>
> I've used this method for all my SuperMicro 6013P-8 servers some running
> 5.1-R and oth
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 04:07:27PM -0700, Stephane Raimbault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install 5.1-R or 5.1-C from floppies redirected output to serial port
> and it won't boot to the install screen. 4.9-R floppies with output redirected to
> serial port works and installs properly. This
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with
> the libm fix from a few days ago). It does not look good; possibly an
> issue with both the compat libc and native libc being linked in? Maybe
> libm.so is stil
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:24:28PM -0500, Mathew Kanner wrote:
> Hello All,
> I tried to fix some LOR in -current and attached you will find
> some patches.
> I sent these to the -sound list but I didn't get a response.
> (Maybe I should mention that I'm also part of the -sound list).
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:13:37PM +0100, John Angelmo wrote:
> Doug White wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that
> >>this was fixed last night in:
> >>
> >>src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c,v1.8
> >>src/
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:21:09PM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote:
> >
> >>i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails
> >>with a lot of errors in s
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote:
> i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails
> with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected
> soon?
Post the errors you're seeing so we don't have to guess.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Des
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 03:34:53AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just committed to switch Advanced Sockets API for IPv6 from
> RFC2292 to RFC3542 (aka RFC2292bis). Though I believe this commit
> doesn't break backward compatibility againt existing binaries, it
> breaks backward comp
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 07:42:06PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Michael L. Squires wrote:
>
> > The "R" statistics port (ports/math/R-letter) is at version 1.7.0. Being
> > the impatient type I tried compiling the recently released 1.8.0 using
> > the same Makefile (with 1.7 ch
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 10:05:48PM +0100, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> With a just recent current I'm getting the following error message.
> I wasn't there just few days ago. I suppose u_int32_t should
> be substituted with the stdint.h POSIX types uint32_t.
>
> tcc -Ysystem -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFI
1 - 100 of 1570 matches
Mail list logo
