On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 01:39:08PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions.
*** Error code 1
Stop in
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 02:52:02AM -0700, Shizuka Kudo wrote:
--- aaron g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do beleive the OpenSSL library has moved to a new
default
location. I could be wrong.
- aarong
--
I don't think it has been moved as of yestersday.
OpenSSL has not moved (and
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 05:13:12PM +0900, Yamada Ken Takeshi wrote:
I have the following error when I try to install it.
Is it unique only to me?
I didn't get that when I built it on ref5. That's the only place I've
tried it.
Kris
msg39367/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:15:09AM -0400, Trevor Johnson wrote:
On my friend's BSD/OS system, there is no tar--or rather, it's just a hard
link to pax:
% ls -li `which tar` `which pax`
1819 -r-xr-xr-x 2 bin bin 58288 Jun 12 1998 /bin/pax
1819 -r-xr-xr-x 2 bin bin
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 06:05:06PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
This is very interesting ...
diff -ruN /usr/ports/lang/gcc31/work/gcc-20020527/libstdc++-v3
/usr/src/contrib/libstdc++ | more
I guess this issues has been fixed in the ports version, and is
still unfixed in the system.
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 04:56:45PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:52, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At Fri, 7 Jun 2002 12:43:27 + (UTC),
John Angelmo wrote:
(cd /usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dist/bin; /usr/bin/env
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=.
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 07:30:09PM -0500, drogoh wrote:
I tried compiling x11amp just a few minutes ago and got this:
Yes, this kind of thing should be expected after a compiler upgrade.
Follow the directions and report the bug to the gcc developers.
Kris
msg39285/pgp0.pgp
Description:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 09:43:59PM +0900, Motoyuki Konno wrote:
Please try the following patch.
Thanks, this fixed the XFree86-4-libraries build. I've committed the
patch.
Kris
msg39291/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:45:24AM +, Andres A Moya wrote:
src/gnu/usr.bin/tar source code deleted?
Yes, see the cvs logs.
Makefile can't find *.c *.h files
very funny
what is wrong???
You have stale .depend files?
Kris
msg39192/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:04:58PM -0700, walt wrote:
The kind of compile errors for mozilla have been changing as the
C++ problems get fixed. Today's error is one I haven't seen
before--a core dump. Does this suggest a non-c++ problem that
needs fixing? Sorry about the line-wrap: I put
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 02:29:17PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:42:24PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
* (lots of ports) The new C++ compiler deprecated a lot of headers by
moving them to a different directory: this breaks a heck of a lot of
ports). IMO we
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 07:52:19PM -0700, walt wrote:
...it tells me at
the end that all the files I told it to install remain
for me to merge by hand.
Read the messages more closely and you should see one about
perl not being installed. mergemaster tries to use perl,
but
I've done another package build run under a recent 5.0-CURRENT.
Things are not good: only 45% of the ports in the ports collection are
actually building, compared to a build rate of over 90% on 4.x.
The biggest chunk of damage comes from the XFree86-libraries failure
reported here already; apart
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:14:23PM -0700, Paul Herman wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
However, before proceeding I would like to get an advice with regard
to the most appropriate procedure for doing the upgrade.
This came up in another list somewhere (don't know off
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:21:24PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/bogosort-0.3.3.log
Any program which declares sys_errlist for itself is wrong. In most
cases, the program should be using either strerror() or strerror_r(),
depending on its
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:54:32PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
But the error handling path of any program is not one of them; if
you are optimizing something other than the success path, there is
something fundamentally wrong with your program or problem statement
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 02:10:28AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
last week, I've began to comlete your work done last year by resyncing
FreeBSD pax w/ the NetBSD/OpenBSD ones. would be done by the end of this
week...
Cool! Thanks for doing this.
Kris
msg39139/pgp0.pgp
Description:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:17:14PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
How long does it take to build world + all ports, vs. just world,
if what you are doing is building everything, not caring about
correcting ports dependencies? E.g. not serializing through the
ports build farm process? Is it
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:38:57PM -0500, Peter Schultz wrote:
I'm getting the following error on a just built -current, which was a
fresh install of 5.0-CURRENT-20020519-JPSNAP:
Yes, and if you'd been reading the mailing list like you're supposed
to you would have already known about this.
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Sebastien Gioria wrote:
Hello guys,
I've update May 25 my notebook with a fresh -CURRENT cvsup
source and now when I want to build a new -current on my notebook
I've got repeated build failures.
I've got a lot of time this type of error Illegal
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:56:50PM +0800, kai ouyang wrote:
Hi,everybody
I found many v_operations, such as VOP_UNLOCK, VOP_OPEN., there all have a
parameter(struct proc) in FreeBSD4.x, but,
there all be changed to thread in FreeBSD5.0. why? And what relation of the proc and
thread ?
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 10:58:54AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
Please raise your concern with [EMAIL PROTECTED] I provided them with
a USE_GCC patch that would make this easier 2 months ago. It still has
yet to be committed to bsd.port.mk.
For the benefit of others, there are problems with
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 06:58:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 04:21:17PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 10:58:54AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
Please raise your concern with [EMAIL PROTECTED] I provided them with
a USE_GCC patch
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 06:21:22PM -0700, Scott Reese wrote:
Hello,
I just upgraded my 4-STABLE machine to -CURRENT via source. Everything
seemed to go smoothly and things are running fine, EXCEPT when I try to
build *any* of the ports in the ports collection. Every time I run
'make' it
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 03:33:34PM +0200, Miguel Mendez wrote:
Hi,
Like I've reported before, I'm getting a panic with DP1 about once a day
in dumpsys () at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:505.
That's not actually where the panic is occurring (it's a second panic
caused by the kernel trying
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 09:46:06PM +0200, Martin Kacerovsky wrote:
Hi,
I've just CVSUPed sources of kernel (I had a snapshot) and there's no
crypto directory in src/sys and make writes error :
make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/rijndael-alg-fst.c. Stop
what
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:17:44PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
Ade == Ade Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ade Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place
Ade editing feature of sed that was recently added, and thus it
Ade needs to be conditional on
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:50:39PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
/usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re
OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It
needs some spit and polish,
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 11:27:42PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
That one's easy to diagnose:
You change your windowsize while tcsh happened to be in free(3) (frame #12).
I've been seeing malloc crashes in tcsh as well, but not in the same
codepath (they occur during a 'cd' operation).
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 04:00:53PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
KOMATSU Shinichiro wrote:
(add To: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
From: Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?
Date: Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:31:32AM JST
there's a circular dependency
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:12:16PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote:
-. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7
-_CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6 # gcc doesn't support athlon yet, but it will
+. if ${CPUTYPE} == athlon
+_CPUCFLAGS = -march=athlon
AFAIK the k7 is a valid name for the athlon (marchitecture name).
Don't
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:38PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:08:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:12:16PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote:
-. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7
-_CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6 # gcc doesn't support athlon yet
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:]
What do people think of this patch to embellish bsd.cpu.mk?
I also changed pN to be the more canonical pentiumN (with pN aliases of
course).
Index:
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
-87,17 +113,17
# presence of a CPU feature.
.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == i386
-. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7
-MACHINE_CPU = k7 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486 i386
+. if ${CPUTYPE} == athlon
+MACHINE_CPU = athlon 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:17:40PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:46:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
-87,17 +113,17
# presence of a CPU feature.
.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == i386
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:28:14PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:43:10PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
+if !defined(CPUTYPE)
+CPUTUNE ?= ev56
+.endif
CPUTYPE ?= ev4
What is this for?
Unlike i386, but catering to ev4 Alpha's; we strongly pessimize
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:38:39PM -0700, Galen Sampson wrote:
Hello all,
Experiencing some troubles with pthreads building ports. An example:
This is probably due to the gcc upgrade which you should have read
about.
Kris
msg38221/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:02:41AM -0500, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote:
rman on -current chokes and dies on gv.man from gv-3.5.8.
rman on -stable can take it with no problems at all.
It's an XFree86-4.x problem.
Kris
msg38092/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:27:55AM -0500, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 10:07:53PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:02:41AM -0500, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote:
rman on -current chokes and dies on gv.man from gv-3.5.8.
rman on -stable can take
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 07:49:50AM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
sobomax 2002/05/04 07:49:50 PDT
Modified files:
usr.sbin/pkg_install/info info.h main.c perform.c pkg_info.1
show.c
usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib lib.h plist.c
Log:
Add ability to
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:42:22PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
I definately do not call libiberty kernel related.
Nor do we, by default, advocate NO_WERROR. So in effect, we broke moving
from older versions to newer versions of CURRENT.
Can you track down what the actual cause of
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 07:31:30AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
-On [20020506 00:30], Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:42:22PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
I definately do not call libiberty kernel related.
Nor do we, by default, advocate
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:45:49PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
I just did a cvsup today to -current on a GENERIC+SMP kernel and my uptime
is showing 8909 days. Motherboard is an ASUS A7M266D with the (possibly
buggy) 1004 BIOS.
I'm seeing this too, but I expect it's probably caused by
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:05:47AM -0700, Hiten Pandya wrote:
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing this too, but I expect it's probably caused by out of sync
kernel and world. I haven't yet been able to test this hypothesis.
Just wondering, could this be because
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 07:46:27PM +0200, Richard Arends wrote:
Hello,
On a fresh current i get this
# truss /bin/echo hello
truss: cannot open /proc/13245/mem: No such file or directory
truss: cannot open /proc/curproc/mem: No such file or directory
procfs is not mounted by
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 08:11:58PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
On 28-Apr-2002 (17:56:47/GMT) Harti Brandt wrote:
RAOn a fresh current i get this
RA# truss /bin/echo hello
RAtruss: cannot open /proc/13245/mem: No such file or directory
RAtruss: cannot open /proc/curproc/mem: No
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 08:49:55PM +0200, Richard Arends wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
procfs is not mounted by default.
New to current (one day old baby :-), so didn't know that. sorry()
Why isn't it mounted by default??
Numerous and horrendous security
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:52:00PM +0200, Eric Jacoboni wrote:
I think this problem is related to my own /usr/src tree as i don't see
any other messages about such a pb in -Current. As i update with
cvsup, i don't know where this problem could come from.
Yeah..most likely explanation is
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:51:08PM -0700, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
phk 2002/04/26 14:51:08 PDT
Modified files:
sys/kern kern_tc.c
sys/sys timepps.h timetc.h
Log:
This commit causes the bento package cluster to hang at boot time:
[...]
I've had 4 panics on the ports cluster in the past couple of days.
They're running kernels from March 31 which have been very stable
since then, but on the other hand I've been building packages
intensively for the past few days. Is there anything interesting
here? I have the cores if more
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 02:22:10PM +0600, Vladimir G. Drobyshevsky wrote:
Have a nice day!
Yesterday I received that message from one of linux guys:
Perhaps you should read the security advisories we release.
Kris
msg37685/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 02:06:51PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
You have stale kernels.
Yes, as noted the cluster has been running for a few weeks with March
31 kernels.
I'll try again with WITNESS enabled next time I update them.
Kris
msg37704/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 05:49:52PM +0200, Christian Flügel wrote:
But I still get signal 12 exceptions when trying to installworld.
It seems to me that the install process still uses my old kernel and I am
not able to load the new one. Could anybody please tell me how to achieve
this?
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:58:42PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 05:49:52PM +0200, Christian Flügel wrote:
:
: But I still get signal 12 exceptions when trying to installworld
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:55:37PM +0200, Christian Flügel wrote:
Hello Folks.
I currently try to upgrade from 4.5 STABLE to CURRENT.
I have cvsuped my source and already made buildworld and buildkernel.
But installworld failed with Signal 12 while installing chpass.
You're attempting
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:09:44PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
I have cvsuped my source and already made buildworld and buildkernel.
But installworld failed with Signal 12 while installing chpass.
You're attempting to upgrade incorrectly. Follow the directions
_precisely_
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:27:50PM +0300, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
How-to-repeat: launch linux-netscape while in X11
Are you absolutely sure all kernel modules are up to date? A
sure-fire way to cause panics with linux applications is to use an
out of date linux.ko.
Isn't
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:58:22PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
Hi,
I see the new new behaviour of expr(1) requires you to add '--' if your
commandline arguments might start with a '-'. This does break things
a little because our old expr(1) does not understand a '--' in the
beginning and the
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:22:20PM +0300, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Panicstring: bremfree: bp 0xc77fb678 not locked
This isn't the real panic, it's a second panic caused by trying to
sync disks.
How-to-repeat: launch linux-netscape while in X11
Are you absolutely sure all kernel modules
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:02:11AM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:13:23PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
After yesterdays new build I found a problem
Xfree86-4 can't start as regular user (exept root)
Read the fine message you got at install
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:56:50PM -0700, James Satterfield wrote:
I've found that wrapper needs to be updated with XFree86-4.
wrapper always needs to be rebuilt when you update X, yes.
Kris
msg37453/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:13:23PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
After yesterdays new build I found a problem
Xfree86-4 can't start as regular user (exept root)
Read the fine message you got at install-time and install the wrapper
port.
Kris
msg37428/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:31:06PM +, Jan Stocker wrote:
twoflower# make install clean
Check you
a) don't already have an .install_done cookie in the ${WRKDIR}.
b) have an up-to-date bsd.port.mk
Kris
msg37331/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:36:49AM -0700, Seth Hettich wrote:
Trying to update to -current, in SU mode, doing the make installworld:
[ ! -e /usr/bin/passwd ] || echo foo
will make sh die
This is even with the new sh from my buildworld (I am running the new
kernel).
You're probably
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:04:34PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
Since a recent upgrade to one of my development systems, I can't use
nfsd. I've completely reinstalled /etc, set all appropriate knobs in
rc.conf. rpcbind no longer gets started, and mountd dies with can't
register
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 06:40:52PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 02:17:45PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
Just for the record, and to make things more fun, the program works when
linked with efence. Could this narrow the problem to libc? Any ideas?
Sounds like it could
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 05:54:36PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 06:43:13PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: David O'Brien committed a workaround to the clog port yesterday to
: move the initializer to main() instead of trying to do it statically
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 08:42:48AM +0100, Rasmus Skaarup wrote:
httpd in free(): error: junk pointer, too high to make sense
Do ls -l /etc/malloc.conf
Then read the malloc(3) manpage.
Then complain to the apache and/or mod_perl developers about the bug
in their code.
Kris
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:38:49AM +0100, Ollivier Robert wrote:
Since I upgraded to my CURRENT machine into two days ago sources, I'm
getting this from ntpd.
Mar 28 07:37:03 caerdonn ntpd[171]: time reset -1.151848 s
Mar 28 08:00:47 caerdonn ntpd[171]: time reset -1.222628 s
Mar 28
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 10:31:36PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
I use the following quick fix for the corresponding core dump in man and zgrep.
I'd like to see this committed and merged to the DP1 tree ASAP so my
packages stop dumping core and we can produce a DP1 snapshot that
includes linux
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:25:17AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:49:42AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I use the following quick fix for the corresponding core dump in man and zgrep.
I'd like to see this committed and merged to the DP1 tree ASAP so my
packages
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:43:07PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020324 14:26] wrote:
The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track
down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the
following lock order reversal
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:30:39PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
OK. Someone needs to go and fix those 84 ports then.
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest-4-latest.html
Has anyone contacted the maintainers? I'm sure that not all
The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track
down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the
following lock order reversal in sys_pipe.c overnight:
Mar 24 07:31:44 user.crit gohan17 kernel: lock order reversal
Mar 24 07:31:44 user.crit gohan17 kernel:
...for example, the w3m port. As part of the configure script, it
executes the following shell command:
expr --prefix=/usr/local : -*prefix=\(.*\)
expr: syntax error
Is expr to blame, or w3m?
Kris
msg36527/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 08:05:26PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 16:59:36 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
expr --prefix=/usr/local : -*prefix=\(.*\)
expr: syntax error
Is expr to blame, or w3m?
w3m is to blame. See expr(1) for more details
The changes to the definitions of stdout/stdin/stderr from a while
back caused a number of ports to break (somewhere around 84, according
to bento). For example, the cap port fails like this:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/cap-6.0.198.log
cc -DBYTESWAPPED -DPHASE2 -O
..include the following:
bftpd-1.0.22.log
pam-pgsql-0.5.2_2.log
pam_ldap-1.4.0.log
pam_mysql-0.4.7.log
pam_ssh-1.5.log
samba-3.0a15.log
vlock-1.3.log
Logs available on bento:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/
Kris
msg36531/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 06:43:13PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: David O'Brien committed a workaround to the clog port yesterday to
: move the initializer to main() instead of trying to do it statically.
:
: Is this something which is supposed to work?
No. This isn't something that is
I upgraded the bento package building cluster to a more recent
-current to try and get packages building again (every other snapshot
I've tried for the last week has either been broken or does not
build). One of the client machines panicked after about an hour under
load:
The kernel and
Hi all,
With the 5.0 Developer Preview snapshot just around the corner it's
very important that we get as many ports building as possible. There
are a *lot* of easily fixed compilation errors under 5.0 (for example,
over a hundred ports are still broken because of malloc.h). In
total there are
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:03:01AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
With the 5.0 Developer Preview snapshot just around the corner it's
very important that we get as many ports building as possible. There
are a *lot* of easily fixed compilation errors under 5.0 (for example,
over
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 09:23:33AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:41:58AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I upgraded the bento package building cluster to a more recent
-current to try and get packages building again (every other snapshot
Could you run the actual DP#1
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 06:34:00PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 20:43:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Jeff Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you both running with WITNESS and INVARIANTS? UMA is slightly slower
with these options on than the original malloc vm_zone code. I'm not
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 08:44:48AM -0600, Michael D. Harnois wrote:
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 07:02, Thomas Quinot wrote:
Le 2002-03-21, Harti Brandt écrivait :
This revision of kern_linker.c entirly disables module loads from /etc/rc
during boot:
Or even after boot. Confirmed
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:42:22AM -0600, Eric Liedtke wrote:
So I cvsuped last night and did a make buildworld and make buildkernel,
both of which finished without a problem however when I did a make
installworld it died right away with the cp command giving usage
details.
This isn't the
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:11:05PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
I cvsuped again. Got the vm_map.c now compiled but now
kernel compilation stops somehwere in ipv6 files.
Can one switch off compiler pickyness?
Go back and read what config(8) is telling you, it's right there in
front of
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:36:15PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:16:05 PST, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Go back and read what config(8) is telling you, it's right there in
front of you!
You shouldn't be too hard on people about missing config(8)'s output,
given
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 11:16:23PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 22:55] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please let me know if this works for you.
[...]
+ PROC_LOCK(td);
*cough* *cough*
:)
It was untested.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:36:31PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020318 08:23] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think you're right, I'm pretty sure the fix is basically moving
the p-p_fd = NULL to after the closef will fix
I tried upgrading the bento cluster to 5.x so I can actually get 5.0
packages built (eaccess problems), and 5 of them blew up in about 10
minutes with this (I think this is going to be an .. uh .. interesting
test of the stability of 5.0-CURRENT):
IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x004a6000
initial
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:49:58PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I tried upgrading the bento cluster to 5.x so I can actually get 5.0
packages built (eaccess problems), and 5 of them blew up in about 10
minutes with this (I think this is going to be an .. uh .. interesting
test of the stability
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:49:58PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I tried upgrading the bento cluster to 5.x so I can actually get 5.0
packages built (eaccess problems), and 5 of them blew up in about 10
minutes with this (I think this is going to be an .. uh .. interesting
test of the stability
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 10:17:39PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020317 19:27] wrote:
...the process has no open files at all, because...
(kgdb) p p-p_pid
$4 = 10099
(kgdb) p p-p_comm
$5 = wc\000oot, '\000' repeats 13 times
(kgdb) p
Hi all,
I'm just uploading a new 5.x package set. This run was better than
the previous (5364 packages vs. 5123 for the last run, but far fewer
than the 5973 packages which are building in 4.x), but there were
still a number of significant failures: qt2 is still failing so kde
doesn't build,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 04:41:59PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 04:31:44PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm just uploading a new 5.x package set. This run was better than
the previous (5364 packages vs. 5123 for the last run, but far fewer
than the 5973 packages
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 08:36:29AM +0600, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
I've installed qt23 from ports painlessly
Fine, I'm glad to hear it :)
The compile problems seem to be related to recent compiler toolchain
changes, which you might not see unless you recompiled everything qt23
depends on from
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:56:53PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:40:37PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
The compile problems seem to be related to recent compiler toolchain
changes, which you might not see unless you recompiled everything qt23
depends on from scratch
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:56:53PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:40:37PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
The compile problems seem to be related to recent compiler toolchain
changes, which you might not see unless you recompiled everything qt23
depends on from scratch
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:25:39PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Alex Zepeda wrote:
As far as Qt goes, rip out that objprelink crap. Without it Qt will build
and work just fine. At least Qt 3.whatever works for me. I don't know
why objprelink isn't working correctly for Qt, but I don't
701 - 800 of 1469 matches
Mail list logo
