On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 11:46:45PM -0500, Sean Kelly wrote:
> I'm surry I don't have much data to provide, but...
>
> I've been experiencing random lockups on a -CURRENT kernel from the August
> 5th source. I've gotten it a lot when running screen and ssh on two
> different terminals at the same
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:25:13PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very
> soon.
>
> The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code
> builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now,
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 01:26:34AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> Back in the old days -stable was reserved for bug fixes and some
> features/enhancements. ABI and API changes weren't allowed. When
> someone made a mistake, they got the same clout across the back of
> the head that they do now
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:28:09AM -0700, Glen Gross wrote:
> This gives me the opportunity to ask a question I have been wondering for a
> while... I've been building kernels with IPSEC support
> and was unclear what kind of load this puts on the system by default. If IPSEC
> has hooks into al
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:53:56AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote:
> libpam will not build if you don't have the stock ssh installed.
> I use ssh from ports.
>
> (libpam)502}make
> ===> modules
> ===> modules/pam_deny
> ===> modules/pam_ftp
> ===> modules/pam_nologin
> ===> modules/pam_opie
> ===> mo
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:54:00AM -0600, Brad Huntting wrote:
>
> Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
>
> Kris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responds:
> > I doubt it would be possible: it has hooks all through the network
> > code.
>
> Wh
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 04:55:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
I doubt it would be possible: it has hooks all through the network
code.
Kris
PGP signature
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:44:33AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > installed. This would involve a repo copy of crypto/openssl/crypto/bn
> > to contrib/openssl-bn or something, and I'd keep the two in sync
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 09:28:06AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 30-Jul-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For the past 2 or 3 weeks my -current system has been experiencing
> > temporary lockups, usually under disk load. The entire system will
>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 02:03:31AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1) For some reason, my mdmfs line in /etc/fstab always does a chmod
> > 777 /tmp at mount-time
> >
> > /dev/md0/tmpmfs
Hi all,
For the past 2 or 3 weeks my -current system has been experiencing
temporary lockups, usually under disk load. The entire system will
hang for around 20-30 seconds, during which time absolutely no
network/IO/keyboard/mouse activity is accepted. Usually, after 20-30
seconds the system wi
1) For some reason, my mdmfs line in /etc/fstab always does a chmod
777 /tmp at mount-time
/dev/md0/tmpmfs rw,-s=65536 0 0
2) the -X debugging option to mdmfs isn't documented in the manpage
3) The following sequence of commands will cause my -current b
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 06:38:36PM -0500, Steve Price wrote:
> I think I might have missed part of this thread so forgive me
> if this has already been brought up. We need to get a couple
> of package builds under our belts before this gets MFCd. I
> seem to recall there were a couple of ports t
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:06:58AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> I've imported the libmp-in-terms-of-OpenSSL library and connected it
> to the build. I've also disconnected libgmp and friends from the
> build, but have not `cvs rm`'d it yet. Assuming no problems turn up,
> I plan to do that in tw
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 10:27:05AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 06:38:25AM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > > > > Personally, I think it's worth it to get rid of a GNU dependency in
> > > > > the base system, as well as reducing the overall amount of functional
> > > >
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 03:46:15AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 03:15:38 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> > I've completed a pretty clean crossgrade [1] to -CURRENT and find that
> > su is broken. I thought this had been fixed.
> >
> > I have a virgin rev 1.17 /etc/pam
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 04:27:39PM +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I CVSuped at Thu Jul 19 11:33:58 UTC 2001, and did make world.
> Then Xwrapper always exits on signal 11, and I cannot use X11 now.
Rebuild them. Recent PAM changes broke binary compatibility within
5.0-CURRENT. Hopef
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 01:37:16AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > a) libcrypt has been "reunified" for 7 months now; Peter did it last
> > December.
>
> Someone needs to tell my newly installed 4.3 system this.
>
> 4.3-RELEASE _di
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 12:24:07AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > I'm saying "fix it both places, or it obviously is not a
> > > sufficient justification for a decision".
> > >
> > > Or to put it another way "if you are willing to live with
> > > it in one place, why not two?".
> >
> > What on
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:17:25AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > > I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under
> > > > 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.)
> > >
> > > The cryptography libraries have set a precedent h
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> Okay. So it sounds like there's a "shim" to libedit which would be
> the API replacement for libreadline. Could we call that something
> cute like 'libreadlinele' ('le' for 'libedit') or 'libeditrl', but
> leave libreadline as
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:23:28PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> I may be misunderstanding what you mean here, but I don't think
> we should replace libreadline with libedit. However, I do find
> this very interesting, as some of my friends and I have a program
> that we're going to switch f
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:31:27AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Fetch the following file and unpack it in /usr/src; it will overwrite
> the contents of lib/libedit. You should also disable libreadline in
> gnu/lib/Makefile (and might want to remove /usr/include/readline/* to
>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:16:12AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Personally, I think it's worth it to get rid of a GNU dependency in
> > the base system, as well as reducing the overall amount of functional
> > code duplication.
>
> I don't, particularly since the two programs wh
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 02:33:00PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > It doesn't actually impliment all of libreadline - just it's most
> > common uses. Last time I checked libedit couldn't emulate readline's
> > callback mode. I looked at implimenting the callback stuff, but it
> > would be rea
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:33:51AM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:31:27AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > I've just finished syncing up our libedit to the version in NetBSD,
> > which includes a number of bugfixes, but perhaps more interestingly
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:31:27AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> for GNU libreadline (unfortunately it's not binary compatible with our
> present libedit). I've tested this so far with bc and gdb and it
..or source compatible, apparently. I thought I'd tested this with
Hi all,
I've just finished syncing up our libedit to the version in NetBSD,
which includes a number of bugfixes, but perhaps more interestingly it
can function as a drop-in (apparently binary compatible) replacement
for GNU libreadline (unfortunately it's not binary compatible with our
present li
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:48:27PM -0400, Chris Collins wrote:
> Here is what I get when I do a which. I don't think that there is anything
> wrong with my gzip binary. I use it almost everyday. I'll think that I
> will re-install it just to be sure.
>
>
> bsduser# which gzip
> /sbin/gzip
> bsdu
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 01:01:47AM +0400, Juriy Goloveshkin wrote:
> In my system kernel(WITH SSE) falls when I use commands netstat and swapinfo.
> kernel without SSE works fine.
Proper panic traceback, please?
Did you remember to rebuild your userland when you updated your kernel
sources?
Kri
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:41:21PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> Did you read my other mails? I doesn't appear that you have. Or you
> didn't understand them. I was laughing because, yes, WARNS was turned on
> prematurely which killed things.
Well, your email didn't translate well, because it ca
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 08:07:40PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:12:22PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > > Since David's busy, I'm working on it now. Just some build issues
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 05:49:56PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 12:12:22AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > This kind of language isn't called for. People make mistakes, and
> > insulting them for it serves no useful purpose.
>
> People ar
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 05:38:31PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> What is so hard with ``make -m /home/kris/mk''?
That's actually not one of the hoops you need to jump through on beast
-- I think I got someone to install the new mk files already. The
main hoops are related to stale /usr/include
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:54:45PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > Matt Jacob usually steps in and fixes breakages on the alpha. At the minimum,
> > people should be either testing the build on all archs, or asking for someone
> > else to review the patch on archs they don't have available (this
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:00:25PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 05-Jul-01 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:12:22PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> >> Since David's busy, I'm working on it now. Just some build issues to
> >> be w
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:12:22PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> Since David's busy, I'm working on it now. Just some build issues to
> be worked out since warnings were made fatal recently.
What problems? There shouldn't be any fatalities from warnings unless
people have marked something with
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:00:09AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > it's just the same old same old refrain of "beast is broken" or
> > "oh well", etc. etc. etc but yer right, insulting does no
> > good.
> >
> > I beg too much hard cider at din
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 09:34:10PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> S> > > are on for is the kernel- and even that isn't -Werror.
> > >
> > > You're about two months out of date; we started locking down userland
> >
> > > code around that timeframe. This one probably wasn't tested
> > > thorou
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:41:33PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> Hmm. Somebody must have cranked some C compilation up enough to turn
> warnings into errors.
>
> If I check out chkgrp into /tmp now on a system that's currently trying
> to update itself, I get:
>
> yorp.feral.com > make
> Warn
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 09:38:42AM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 09:20:44PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> > Hmmm... Looks like,
> >
> > # syslogd -a 192.168.1.0/29
> >
> > Will work and,
> >
> > # syslogd -a 192.168.1.1/29
> >
> > Won't.
>
> That's the standard beh
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 11:52:52AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I want to remove S/Key from CURRENT completely, and replace it
> > with OPIE where necessary.
>
> How will this affect OpenSSH's SKeyAuthentication option, which is
> required for ce
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 10:13:06PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 08:07:51 +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 21:03:21 +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > > > I want to remove S/Key from CURRENT completely, and replace it
> > > > with OPIE where necessary.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:44:40PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 01:51:56PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > > libbn is already part of OpenSSH; it's a trivial matter to make it
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 06:22:56PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 11:38:45PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> > It should not be too hard to have build a lightweight 'libbignum' that
> > is extracted from the openssl sources and make that available in the base
> > system.
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:25:41PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 04-Jun-01 Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> >
> > Data modified on freelist: word 2 of object 0xfe000190b780 size 72
> > previous type inodedep (0xd6adc0de != 0xdeadc0de)
> > ...
> > Data modified on freelist: word 2 of object 0x
Was it determined that the fsck corruption problems which were seen
with fsck after the introduction of the dirpref changes do not affect
RELENG_4? I haven't seen any MFC of changes to the RELENG_4 fsck
code, and I'm kind of worried now that I've reverted my current system
back to RELENG_4 :-)
K
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:28:57PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> David> Committers do not need Alpha users to verify that a patch compiles,
> David> Beast.freebsd.org can be used for that. Testing on a running system is
> David> of course a different matter.
>
> I will test building a GENERIC
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:31:58AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
> > > > used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
> > >
> >
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:18:43PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Another problem I'm having in -current right now is with softupdates. When
> the system panic'ed the first time, it came up ok and fsck'ed fine with no
> apparent loss of data. However, during the fsck it complained bitterly
> ab
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 01:48:33PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2001-May-27 20:36:54 -0700, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I've been getting rather a lot of these tonight..any ideas?
> >
> >May 27 18:52:06 xor /boot/kernel/kernel: Data modified
I've been getting rather a lot of these tonight..any ideas?
May 27 18:52:06 xor /boot/kernel/kernel: Data modified on freelist: word 2 of object
0xc1a60100 size 64 previous type pagedep (0xd6adc0de != 0xdeadc0de)
May 27 18:52:06 xor /boot/kernel/kernel: Data modified on freelist: word 2 of objec
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:51:58AM -0500, Matt Bedynek wrote:
> is it possible to use the 5.0-current kernel with releases such as 4.3?
> I would like to take advantage of the SMP optimizations that are in
> 5.0current.
No.
Kris
PGP signature
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:59:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Shouldn't the includes/Makefile be installing headers using
> INCOWN/INCGRP instead of BINOWN/BINGRP? I ran into this when trying
> to do a 'make includes' as a normal user.
Oops, hit send too soon; more
Shouldn't the includes/Makefile be installing headers using
INCOWN/INCGRP instead of BINOWN/BINGRP? I ran into this when trying
to do a 'make includes' as a normal user.
Kris
Index: include/Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/inc
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:04:24AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> I get the above panic when just running aviplay (/usr/ports/graphics/avifile) or
>wine.
> Since both programs use USER_LDT functions I suspect a problem there in the kernel.
> The kernel is the latest -current.
> I get
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:16 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>
> > Why can't that program _replace_ mount_mfs? And assume the name too?
>
> The objection that impressed me the last time this was suggested is that
> it's totally
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 12:04:11PM -0500, Storms of Perfection wrote:
> Latest CVS from a couple minutes ago, on the kernel compile (make depend
> goes fine)
>
> [root@home] SMP.Kernel> make
> cc -c -x assembler-with-cpp -DLOCORE -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall
> -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-ext
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:36:42PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Sheldon Hearn posted a patch to add such a knob around January when we
> were having this exact discussion. Personally, I think it only solves
> half a problem; what if you want /tmp and /tmp2? And why should it be
> limited to boo
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:12:14PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On 24 May, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 10:35:43PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> >> On 24 May, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >> > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 06:13:21PM -0700, Gordon Tetl
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 10:35:43PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On 24 May, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 06:13:21PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> >> Should there be a mount_smbfs to go with this? How does one mount smb
> >> shares otherwise?
>
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 06:26:40PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any sense at all in bumping __FreeBSD_version in -CURRENT?
> (I would have liked to see FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE go with 50.)
I think so :-) We need the ability to feature test.
Kris
PGP signature
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 10:19:34PM -0500, Mark Sergeant wrote:
> Another solution would be to remove this users access ?
Yeah, that also basically goes without saying :-)
Kris
PGP signature
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:20:35AM +0700, John Indra wrote:
> Dear all...
>
> First of all, really sorry for cross-posting...
>
> I am running a -CURRENT system (Apr 30th 2001). There is a user in my
> machine running this small program to DoS my xl0 interface. I doubt that
> this program is spe
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:16:31AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Having built and installed -current from last Friday, I find that ssh*
> is now reporting "no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto. See ssl(8)"
> and will only talk SSH2. I couldn't find anything relevant in ssl(8).
>
> I haven't sp
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:37:07PM -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote:
>
> I wrote a trivial program to fill vm and found I can reliably freeze my
> system. It may not work on the first attempt, but certainly within three.
> My command line is:
>
> a.out&;a.out&;a.out&;a.out&;a.out&
>
> The goa
Hi all,
Please test binary compatibility of the OpenSSL 0.9.6a release
available from the below address. By this, I mean: test whether your
SSL applications such as webservers, etc, continue to work without a
recompile after making world. Since 0.9.6a is a point release along
the 0.9.6-STABLE b
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 06:23:59PM -0500, GH wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:15:34PM -0700, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> > Any -current kernel built over the weekend is a likely victim of this bug.
> > In a nutshell, it will eat your root filesystem at the very least, leaving
> > you with
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:25:34AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Sounds like some excellent work that was long over due. Go for it. :)
Agreed.
I've always found there are doc hackers willing to help with markup
problems on request, so I don't think that's a serious issue.
Kris
PGP signat
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 01:58:05PM +0200, Mart Norman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to upgrade from 3.0 to 4.3 but make buildworld fails
Why are you sending this to freebsd-current?
> Any hints what should i do to make buildworld successful?
Do a binary upgrade; it will be much easier.
Kris
P
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 06:11:25PM +0400, Ilya Naumov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 'make buildworld' fails with the following symptoms:
>
> ===> usr.sbin/rpc.lockd
> cc -pipe -march=k6 -I. -I/usr/obj/garbage/src/i386/usr/include/rpcsvc -g
>-I/usr/obj/garbage/src/i386/usr/include -c /garbage/src/usr.sb
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 04:49:24PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Is this still true?
I don't believe so; I updated from 4.3-RC to 5.0-CURRENT on this
machine and didn't have to do anything special (except set NOMAN,
because I was being studly and updating using 'make all' instead of
'make world'
I committed this earlier..thanks.
Kris
PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 02:31:38PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm running 5.0-Current-4.12.2001, X-Kern-Developer with all binaries,
> have just installed the samba package (pkg_add -r samba) but the smb
> client services, specifically mount_smbfs, aren't installed.
>
> I cannot find ref
Did you remember to run mergemaster?
Kris
PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 11:57:05AM +1000, Andrew Newlands wrote:
> > Do you have the src-sys-crypto collection?
>
> I fixed this last night; solution was to get the contents of /usr/src/sys/crypto
> via ftp rather than using cvsup. Slightly surprising since src-crypto is in my
> cvsupfile.intl
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 03:16:42PM +1000, Andrew Newlands wrote:
> If I attempt to build a kernel with the random device it bombs out with this
> message:
>
> Error output:
>
> make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/rijndael-alg-fst.c. Stop
>
> The kernel build happily if I c
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:07:02PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>
> On 29-Mar-2001 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:20:33PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> >> I've been notified that one of the ports I'm responsible for, xswallow, will
>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:20:33PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> I've been notified that one of the ports I'm responsible for, xswallow, will no
> longer build under -current. Here's a snip from the build log:
a.out support is entirely optional thesedays for ports, so it's up to
you whether or
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:15:51PM +0200, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
> Oh and while I'm on it: where is src/crypto/rijndael in the CVS?
in src/sys/crypto/rijndael :-)
> CVSWEB doesn't find it, neither does it get downloaded (this time
> using a complete supfile ;-)...
You need the src-sys-crypto c
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:55:15AM +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
> You should have src/secure/lib/libcrypt/crypt-blowfish.c. If you don't
> have, it's your problem. The CVS repository has this file already:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/crypt-blowfish.c
>
> Ha
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 04:46:45PM -0500, Mike O'Dell wrote:
>
> gee - being like SysV is more comprehensible than worrying about IPv6
Perhaps if you're living in 1994 :-)
Kris
PGP signature
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The syntax for declaring manual pages has been changed.
>
> The manual pages to be installed can now be listed in a
> single MAN variable. The old MAN[1-9] syntax is still
> supported, for backwards compatibility.
>
> Th
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 07:55:01PM -0800, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can everyone please test this patch against OpenSSL, which should fix
> > the problems observed with -j builds as well as cleaning out the
> > temporary ASM fil
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:32:36AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> k6-2 is already over-engineered. The only difference between it and k6
> is 3dnow, but neither gcc nor any source files support 3dnow (now :-).
3dnow support exists in several ports, though.
OTOH, k6-3 doesn't add any new features,
Can everyone please test this patch against OpenSSL, which should fix
the problems observed with -j builds as well as cleaning out the
temporary ASM files.
This fix will need to be committed to -stable prior to the release, as
it shares the same code.
Kris
Index: Makefile
==
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:29:58AM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there anything against adding support for
> k6-3 to the just added CPUTYPE mechanism? :)
> My little machine feels left out. Hehehhe
> I made a simple patch to etc/defaults/make.conf
> a
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:15:27PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:11:09PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > We really need to provide a better rc.conf hook for doing this --
> > expecting people to write their own script just to create a /tmp is
> &g
We really need to provide a better rc.conf hook for doing this --
expecting people to write their own script just to create a /tmp is
lame.
Kris
PGP signature
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:32:29AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> I changed nothing from whatever the default is. It seems like a bit of POLA to
> freeze now.
>
> But I'll check this - if I can get that machine up again :-)...
Press ^T when it freezes and see if it's just blocked in rndslp or
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 05:07:40PM +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
> If there is no mean to create *.pl.s, how about using a pipe to pass
> an assembler code to as(1) ?
Sounds reasonable: I'll take a look.
Kris
PGP signature
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:23:21AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> [on -current]
>
> So I updated the vmware port via CVS today
> but it refuses to build with:
> jules# make
> Error: your port uses an old layout. Please update it to match this
> bsd.port.mk. If you have updated your ports co
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 10:29:42PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> This is on a UP system.
Had another one of these, under the same conditions. Both times I was
running more(1) on a stdin stream which was generated by a "find |
grep | more" operation, and I suspended the pr
This is on a UP system.
Kris
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is a
This is on a UP system.
Kris
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is a
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 03:48:36PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> What on *earth* are you all referring to?
> With current top of tree I get
>
> QUARM:253: unknown option "INVARIANT_SUPPORT"
You're a few days back from the top. It was removed briefly then
reappeared.
Kris
PGP signature
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:33:23PM -0800, Pete Carah wrote:
> I got a panic today on a fresh kernel...
>
> Compiled with netgraph but non of the netgraph modules.
>
> Immediately after the memory probe, a message about sequencers 0-15,
> then:
> Panic: spinlock ng_worklist not in order list
>
>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:23:56PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I have never popluated src/tools in my local tree and
> I've not experienced a problem with "make buildworld"
> because src/tools was empty. In fact, I had a successful
> "make buildworld && make installworld" last night at 2231 PST.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:29:12AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:23:23AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > > The problem is that libtermcap.so, still hanging around, is used by things
&
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:23:23AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> The problem is that libtermcap.so, still hanging around, is used by things
> that don't usually get rebuilt in a buildworld/installworld run (like X11
> tools like xterm)- and attempts to use such things yield:
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root
901 - 1000 of 1570 matches
Mail list logo
