Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

Hi! > The sysctl for block cloning is vfs.zfs.bclone_enabled. > To check if a pool has made use of block cloning: > zpool get all poolname | grep bclone One more thing: I have two pools on that box, and one of them has some bclone files: # zpool get all ref | grep bclone ref bcloneused

Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

Hi! > Am 2023-12-31 19:34, schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > > I already have > > > > vfs.zfs.dmu_offset_next_sync=0 > > > > which is supposed to disable block-cloning. > > It isn't. This one is supposed to fix an issue which is unrelated to block > clon

Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

Hi! > On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 06:43:58AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > markj@ pointed me in > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276039 > > to > > https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15719 > > > > So it will probably be fixed sooner or lat

Re: ZFS problems since recently ?

Hi! > > I can crash mine with "sysctl -a" as well. markj@ pointed me in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276039 to https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15719 So it will probably be fixed sooner or later. The other ZFS crashes I've seen are still an issue. --

ZFS problems since recently ?

Hi! Short overview: - Had CURRENT system from around September - Upgrade on the 23th of December - crashes in ZFS, see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261538 for details - Reinstalled from scratch with new SSDs drives from

Re: Updating motherboard BIOS without MS Windows

Hi! > How do you update BIOS without Windows since most brands only have bios > software to windows? > > I'm about to buy a new pc without windows license and I'm looking for > brands that have bios-cli that work in FreeBSD. There's sysutils/flashrom which allows to flash some BIOS systems.

Re: [UPDATE] FreeBSD 14.0-BETA3 Now Available

Hi! > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:50:08PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > > === Upgrading === > > > > Due to a known delay, freebsd-update(8) binary update builds are not yet > > ready for BETA3. A separate email will be sent once they are available. > > > > Binary updates via freebsd-update(8)

Re: ZFS deadlock in 14

Hi! > > At some point between 42d088299c (4 May) and f0c9703301 (26 June), a > > deadlock was introduced in ZFS. It is still present as of 9c2823bae9 (4 > > August) and is 100% reproducable just by starting poudriere bulk in a > > 16-core VM and waiting a few hours until deadlkres kicks in. > >

Re: ZFS deadlock in 14

Hi! > At some point between 42d088299c (4 May) and f0c9703301 (26 June), a > deadlock was introduced in ZFS. It is still present as of 9c2823bae9 (4 > August) and is 100% reproducable just by starting poudriere bulk in a > 16-core VM and waiting a few hours until deadlkres kicks in. I have a

Re: poudriere && git

Hi! > In the past I created the jails based on svn, for example with > > # poudriere jail -c -j freebsd-r368166 -m svn+http -v head@r368166 I have the src repo in /usr/src, build the host system from that tree and then use: poudriere jail -j head -u -m null -S /usr/src -- p...@opsec.eu

Re: Tooling Integration and Developer Experience

Hi! > > > This can be as easy as moving everything into Phabricator. > > There's the issue that Phabricator itself is no longer supported > > upstream: [...] > > https://we.phorge.it/ > Should be no harder than regular update. They even have a HOWTO >

Re: Tooling Integration and Developer Experience

Hi, > > On 1/30/23 02:54, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >The main idea: to prevent information fragmentation andimprove > >discoverability, cross-referencing abilities, search, etc. > > With regards to improving discoverability, Phabricator's Owner > tool could be a good tactical move:

Re: Tooling Integration and Developer Experience

Hello, > I had a similar thing happen to me, the mailing list FreeBSD-doc seemed to > exist as if no one existed, and there was no one posting in it except for > the automated bug reports from the bots. > I have not had any replies to my several posts either. > So can the admins tell how many

Re: Tooling Integration and Developer Experience

Hi! ihor@antonovs.family wrote: > This can be as easy as moving everything into Phabricator. There's the issue that Phabricator itself is no longer supported upstream: https://admin.phacility.com/phame/post/view/11/phacility_is_winding_down_operations/ https://github.com/phacility/phabricator

Re: Tachyum Prodigy processors

Hi! > does anyone have any information regarding the new Tachyum Prodigy > processors? golem had an article 3 days ago (written in german), which was detailled enough to trigger my interest. https://www.golem.de/news/tachyum-prodigy-t16128-der-wunderkind-prozessor-2206-165307.html --

Re: recover deleted file

Hi! > Maybe UFS developer would do a rework so latest deleted inodes would put in > a "recycle bin" Use ZFS and snapshots, that should help your use-case. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: VDSO on amd64

Hi! > I have mostly finished implementation of "proper" vdso for amd64 > native binaries, both 64bit and 32bit. Vdso wraps signal trampolines > into real dynamic shared object, which is prelinked into dynamically > linked image. Eleven years ago Giuseppe Cocomazzi posted this:

Re: BUG in libm's powf

Hi! > > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 10:22:02PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote: > > > > could you turn to test program into an AFT test to prevent further > > > > regressions? > > > > > > I cannot tell if you are addressing Mark or me. > > > For me, I know nothing about ATF. > > > > man 7 atf > >

Re: BUG in libm's powf

Hi! > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 10:22:02PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote: > > could you turn to test program into an AFT test to prevent further > > regressions? > > I cannot tell if you are addressing Mark or me. > For me, I know nothing about ATF. man 7 atf has more details. -- p...@opsec.eu

Re: Spam mail being sent via the FreeBSD mailing lists

Hi! > > On May 25, 2021, at 8:53 PM, jake h wrote: > > I have recently received several pieces of spam mail, apparently sent via > > this mailing list. These pieces of mail are the usual spam formula; Your > > phone has a virus, Ads, Fake blackmail, so on and so forth. > > Has anyone else

Re: ZFS: out of temporary buffer space

Hi! > ZFS: out of temporary buffer space > > Any ideas on how to fix this ? Ok, fix was this: Using the same memstick, I wrote a new efi partition as a copy from the efi partition on the memstick. gpart (simplified) showed this: =>40 2000409184 nvd0 GPT (954G) 40

ZFS: out of temporary buffer space

Hi! Upgrading a c256294-g2cf84258922f kernel (14.0 from 27th of January) to a more recent version displays this error on reboot: ZFS: out of temporary buffer space Any ideas on how to fix this ? I've tried the fix as described in

Re: FreeBSD 13.0-RC3 Now Available

Hi! > The third RC build of the 13.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available. Upgrading a 13.0-RC2 poudriere jail to RC3 seems to fail ? # poudriere jail -u -j 130 -t 13.0-RC3 [...] To install the downloaded upgrades, run "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update.fixed install". Installing updates...Scanning

Re: Is there any OS builtin git command like svnlite ?

Hi! > I'm working on clean installed VM -current from NFS > mounted src like : > > admin@tbedfc:~ % df -h > Filesystem SizeUsed Avail > Capacity Mounted on > /dev/vtbd0p2 11G4.1G5.7G > 42%/ >

Re: libifconfig_sfp.h does not compile for me

Hi! > This https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/lib/libifconfig/libifconfig_sfp.h > includes libifconfig_sfp_tables.h which does not exist. > > My build fails on this. I cleaned /lib/libifconfig and /sbin/ifconfig, but no > succes. > The last change in these files is a few days ago, am I the only

Re: zpool upgrade to draid feature: does it require updated zfs boot code ?

Hi! > > Short question: > > Does a zpool upgrade on 14.0 (current) for the draid feature > > require a boot code update ? > > Long version of the same question: > > With the draid update, no message was displayed. > > > > Does it require the bootcode update anyway or, if not, why not ? > >

zpool upgrade to draid feature: does it require updated zfs boot code ?

Hi! Short question: Does a zpool upgrade on 14.0 (current) for the draid feature require a boot code update ? Long version of the same question: I've upgraded my testbox to FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #0 main-c256294-g2cf84258922f and the system listed the zfs-feature draid as available if I do an

Re: Preparing ZFS drives

Hi! > How should I label and prepare the drives for ZFS? Someone ought to write a > ???cookbook??? on that! Basically, what I once did, was this: zpool create bck raidz2 ada2 ada3 ada4 ada5 ada6 ada7 ada8 ada9 Therefore: raw disks, nothing else. > Do I need to start the volume on a

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD src repo transitioning to git this weekend

Hi! > It's also hard to collect ALL the keys of the devs at any point in > time to decide if that key is authorized to sign a commit in the > repo... We do have most of the keys in docs/share/pgpkeys/ plus history. > Like if a dev starts in 2021, any commits made by that > dev prior to 2021

Re: firewall choice

Hi! > What's the "best" [1] choice for firewalling these days, in the list's > opinion? At work, we use pf for complex setups, editing the rules using fwbuilder, and ipfw for the simple setups and the quick blocks... -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: zpool export: umount failed, device inexplicably busy (lsof found nothing)

Hi! > If the problem recurs: is it _ever_ sane to get nothing listed by lsof > for a volume that can not be unmounted? Use fstat -- this is part of the base system. Maybe lsof does not catch every corner case ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: Deprecating ftpd in the FreeBSD base system?

Hi! > > I've been advocating removing FTP (and HTTP) from libfetch as well. People > > should be using HTTPS only. > Isn't this a bit too much? I often find myself in need to download > something starting with "http://; or "ftp://; and use fetch for this. It's a bit too much. Deprecating it,

Re: Plans for git

Hi! > Why was the intention to switch NOT announced as such MUCH sooner? Because communicating complex issues which might cause conflict and flame wars etc is not easy. Everyone prefers to hack on code, and possibly procrastinates on the hard stuff 8-} And all those that do the really heavy

Re: Plans for git (was: Please check the current beta git conversions)

Hi! > On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 13:14:10 -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > > We've been updating the svn-git converter and pushing out a new > > converted repo every two weeks, and are now approaching the time where > > we'd like to commit to the tree generated by the exporter, > > ... > > Somehow

Re: OpenZFS support merged

Hi! > > > I caution against 'zpool upgrade' for the next few weeks. > > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision=364746 > > A system running r363767 can upgrade to some revision after r364746 > > and reboot and come up without big issues, running the new openzfs code ? > > Or is some

Re: APM BIOS set to go in FreeBSD

Hi! > APM BIOS support will likely be removed from FreeBSD for FreeBSD 13. This > was once quite important for LAPTOP users. However, it is now no longer > relevant. It stopped being supported around the time that ACPI started to > be released for laptops. This was around the Pentium 200MHz

Re: OpenZFS support merged

Hi! > r364746 merged OpenZFS support in to HEAD. > > The change should be transparent unless you want to use new features. > I caution against 'zpool upgrade' for the next few weeks. > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision=364746 A system running r363767 can upgrade to some revision

Re: The spkr driver

Hi! > I'd like to retire the spkr driver. It was a cute hack before sound cards > were ubiquitous, but it's not been kept up to date, and it's not clear that > it still works It is still Giant locked, and though it's not a huge > effort to do the locking I literally have no way to test it

Re: Does FreeBSD have an assigned Internet OID?

Hi! > For the NFS over TLS work, I have a need for an Internet OID. > (I understand that IETF assigns ones for things like SNMP under > 1.3.6.1.4.1...) > > I'm referring to the long strings of numbers separated by "."s, > where each number is a subtree administered by someone.

Re: test suite for NIC features...

Hi! > Has anyone compiled a script/test suite for testing various NIC > features to make sure they work/function properly? > > That is, being able to run a couple interfaces back to back, and turn > off the features off on one, and make sure things like checksum offload > and the like work

Re: editors/libreoffice PDF export/printing broken

Hi! There is https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247444 which discusses this in more detail. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: lock order reversal and poudriere

Hi! > > > I am compiling some packages with poudriere on 13-current kernel. I > > > noticed some strange messages printed into the terminal and dmesg: > > > > > > lock order reversal: > > [...] > > > Are those the debug messages that aren't visible on non-current kernel > > > and should they be

Re: lock order reversal and poudriere

Hi! > I am compiling some packages with poudriere on 13-current kernel. I > noticed some strange messages printed into the terminal and dmesg: > > lock order reversal: [...] > Are those the debug messages that aren't visible on non-current kernel > and should they be reported? Yes, they should

Re: How to enable tcp bbr in FreeBSD???

Hi! > You can enable the stack globally on new connections without > restarting the box or daemons by running these commands: > > kldload tcp_bbr > > sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_inherit_listen_socket_stack=0 > sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=bbr This fails on the box running 13.0: #

Re: How to enable tcp bbr in FreeBSD???

Hi! > > Thanks. Is BBR active automatically or is there a sysctl or > > socket option to activate it ? > > net.inet.tcp.cc.available: List available congestion control algorithms > net.inet.tcp.cc.algorithm: Default congestion control algorithm Hmm, On my FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT amd64 r359631M

Re: How to enable tcp bbr in FreeBSD???

Hi! > > On 24 Apr 2020, at 07:29, ykla wrote: > > > > I search by Google but found no results about how to enable bbr in > > FreeBSD. BBR had developed in 2019. So I want to enable it. > > See: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision=352657 Thanks. Is BBR active automatically or is

Re: PCIe NVME drives not detected on Dell R6515

Hi! > > pciconf -lBc pcib12 > > pciconf -lBc pcib13 > > Printscreen attached. Attachments are stripped from the list -- can you put them somewhere online ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___

Re: New Xorg - different key-codes

Hi! > On 2020-Mar-11 10:29:08 +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: > >This has to do with switching to using evdev to handle input devices on > >FreeBSD 12 and CURRENT. There's been several reports, and suggested > >solutions to this, as well as an UPDATING entry detailing the change. > > The

Re: lame reverse DNS?

Hi! > The problem has been resolved but I still sometimes see "connect from > unknown[2610:1c1:1:606c::19:2]" in the maillog (today: 6 of 131 > connections). Local unbound issue? That IPv6 has a valid reverse DNS record, so please try to investigate. Something like the output from: dig +trace

Re: Lockdown adaX numbers to allow booting ?

Hi! > > > You're probably looking for this: > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2011-March/011036.html > > > > Thanks, that looks like a very useful approach. > > > > Will test that when I'm in the housing facility, and report back. > > I tested it, no change 8-( Update on

Re: Lockdown adaX numbers to allow booting ?

Hi! > >>> You're probably looking for this: > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2011-March/011036.html > >> > >> Would glabel solve it? > > > > The disks are not gpart-formatted, they are used raw. > > What file system are they formatted with? ZFS, see

Re: Lockdown adaX numbers to allow booting ?

Hi! > > You're probably looking for this: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2011-March/011036.html > > Thanks, that looks like a very useful approach. > > Will test that when I'm in the housing facility, and report back. I tested it, no change 8-( -- p...@opsec.eu

Re: Lockdown adaX numbers to allow booting ?

Hi! > > You're probably looking for this: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2011-March/011036.html > > Would glabel solve it? The disks are not gpart-formatted, they are used raw. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372One year to go !

Re: Lockdown adaX numbers to allow booting ?

Hi! > You're probably looking for this: > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2011-March/011036.html Thanks, that looks like a very useful approach. Will test that when I'm in the housing facility, and report back. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372One

Re: Lockdown adaX numbers to allow booting ?

Hi! > >> Also the question is, what you mean with ???system looses track > > I interpret the hang during boot as 'it looses track'. So I guess > > it tries to read the kernel from the wrong drives. > no, loader does probe disks to see which devices make up the pool and hung > system is not

Re: Lockdown adaX numbers to allow booting ?

> > I've made a few more details available here: > > https://people.freebsd.org/~pi/host/gpart.txt > What about gpart output of the pool drives? No gpart on the bck pool, raw drives. > In general you would create zpools using gptids or gpt labels, not the > devices, so you???re independent of

Re: Lockdown adaX numbers to allow booting ?

Hi! > > We have a system with 10 SATA disks. 2 disks are for the system, > > 8 disks drive a data pool 'bck', configured as raidz2, for backup purposes: > > > > bck72.8T 38.7T 34.1T- - 1%53% 1.00x ONLINE > > - > > The problem is that if all 10 disks are

Lockdown adaX numbers to allow booting ?

Hi! We have a system with 10 SATA disks. 2 disks are for the system, 8 disks drive a data pool 'bck', configured as raidz2, for backup purposes: bck72.8T 38.7T 34.1T- - 1%53% 1.00x ONLINE - The problem is that if all 10 disks are connected, the system looses

Re: poudriere, swap full and top says memory is free ?

Hi! > > Mem: 4598M Active, 2854M Inact, 11G Laundry, 6409M Wired, 6375M Free > > ARC: 3850M Total, 1721M MFU, 2090M MRU, 665K Anon, 19M Header, 19M Other > > 3406M Compressed, 3942M Uncompressed, 1.16:1 Ratio > > Swap: 18G Total, 18G Used, 396K Free, 99% Inuse, 68K In > > > > So: Swap is

poudriere, swap full and top says memory is free ?

Hi! I'm running - a poudriere build - of a list of ports - on 12.0-RELEASE-p10 - on a 4 core+4 hyperthreads CPU, an Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v6 @ 3.50GHz - with 32 GB RAM - zpool with 2x 500 GB SSDs as a mirror and right now, this can be seen: last pid: 90922; load averages: 5.02,

Re: PCengines APU2C4, 12-STABLE: bootloader failure: Panic: free: guard2 fail @ 0x1000 + 2311663946 from

Hi! > on APU2C4 from PCengines with latest firmware apu2_v4.9.0.7.rom, SeaBIOS > rel-1.12.1.3-0-g300e8b7, booting via legacy MBR FreeBSD 12-STABLE r350274 > (the same with > r350115) fails to boot with an immediate loader error: Why did you choose -STABLE ? I have 12.0p7 running on APU2C4 and

Re: Fwd: ZFS Crash/Pool in unhealthy state

Hi! > the drives are fine. > > If I import the pool readonly, zpool status is also fine. > > https://www.lerctr.org/~ler/ZFS_STATUS.png Interesting. Which version of FreeBSD is this box running ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372One year to go !

Re: Fwd: ZFS Crash/Pool in unhealthy state

Hi! > Forwarding to -Current as well, since it's a -current box What is the status of the drives ? zpool status ? There's a crash recovery tool, if all else fails: https://www.klennet.com/zfs-recovery/default.aspx -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372One year to go

Re: Crash on very recent CURRENT if using poudriere

Hi! > > > > [panic] non-zero write count during poudriere run > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238031 > > > > > > > > Ideas on how to proceed ? > > > > > > Try this. > > > > Unfortunatly, I can no longer reproduce the crashes after the > > update of the kernel to

Re: Crash on very recent CURRENT if using poudriere

Hi! > > [panic] non-zero write count during poudriere run > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238031 > > > > Ideas on how to proceed ? > > Try this. Unfortunatly, I can no longer reproduce the crashes after the update of the kernel to r348454. -- p...@opsec.eu

Crash on very recent CURRENT if using poudriere

Hi! [panic] non-zero write count during poudriere run https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238031 Ideas on how to proceed ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372One year to go ! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Re: FreeBSD and Coreboot

Hi! > * The PC Engines boards evidently use coreboot, and I've heard multiple > reports of them running FreeBSD systems without a problem. I have approx. 130 of the PC Engines APUs in varius versions up until the most recent, running with FreeBSD just fine. No special setup, just the generic

Re: Updating bugzilla password?

Hi! > > I have forgotten my bugzilla account password. I've > > entered the Login: account name, and clicked the > > "Forgot Password" button. > I'll file a bugzilla bug on your behalf in 10-20 mins. There's > a better mailing list for this kind of query.. it's just evading my mind.

Re: Multiport serial card Exsys EX-44388, where are the devices ?

Hi! > > > Well no longer needed as puc0 has found and allocated the > > > device(s) which would of shown up had you done this before > > > you fixed puc0 to find them. > > > > The problem is that the found 4 uarts are not 8 uarts, and they do not > > seem to work (tested using kermit), either

Re: Multiport serial card Exsys EX-44388, where are the devices ?

Hi! > >> > Well no longer needed as puc0 has found and allocated the > >> > device(s) which would of shown up had you done this before > >> > you fixed puc0 to find them. > >> The problem is that the found 4 uarts are not 8 uarts, and they do not > >> seem to work (tested using kermit), either

Re: Multiport serial card Exsys EX-44388, where are the devices ?

Hi! > Well no longer needed as puc0 has found and allocated the > device(s) which would of shown up had you done this before > you fixed puc0 to find them. The problem is that the found 4 uarts are not 8 uarts, and they do not seem to work (tested using kermit), either 8-( Any hints on how to

Re: Multiport serial card Exsys EX-44388, where are the devices ?

Hi! > > none1@pci0:7:4:0: class=0x070002 card=0x000814a1 chip=0x000814a1 > > rev=0xb0 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Systembase Co Ltd' > > class = simple comms > > subclass = UART > > bar [10] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x1040, size 64, enabled > > bar [14]

Re: Multiport serial card Exsys EX-44388, where are the devices ?

Hi! > > > uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 10 on acpi0 [...] > > I compared it to a second, similar hardware and there I found the same > > uart2, > > even if no card was installed 8-( > > > > So it seems the card is not detected at all 8-( > > Need to find out why it is not

Re: Multiport serial card Exsys EX-44388, where are the devices ?

Hi! > > It only detects four (or six?) serials... > Are perhaps 2 of them being consumed by sio? See my other post, the system found 13 uarts 8-} > > So I think I found a 'somehow' working setup and have to add stuff to > > sys/dev/puc/pucdata.c to match it. Thanks for the pointer! > > Ok,

Re: Multiport serial card Exsys EX-44388, where are the devices ?

Hi! > uart is the new thing. sio info should be ignored. > > Chances are good that this device doesn't have the proper entries in the > puc driver. Do you have any pci devices that show up as unclaimed? In a different box, I got this: none1@pci0:7:4:0: class=0x070002 card=0x000814a1

Re: Multiport serial card Exsys EX-44388, where are the devices ?

Hi! > uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 10 on acpi0 Ah, that is a false lead. I compared it to a second, similar hardware and there I found the same uart2, even if no card was installed 8-( So it seems the card is not detected at all 8-( -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171

Re: Multiport serial card Exsys EX-44388, where are the devices ?

Hi! > > Trying to get a 8-port serial PCIe card into operation (Exsys EX-44388). > > After reboot, dmesg shows: > > > > uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 10 on acpi0 [...] > uart is the new thing. sio info should be ignored. > > Chances are good that this device doesn't have the

Multiport serial card Exsys EX-44388, where are the devices ?

Hi! Trying to get a 8-port serial PCIe card into operation (Exsys EX-44388). After reboot, dmesg shows: uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 10 on acpi0 and /dev/ has cuau2* devices. It's unclear, which of the 8 ports is cuau2 (I'll test that later, I promise 8-), but where are the

Re: UEFI, loader.efi and /boot.config

Hello, > I was wondering if people will expect /boot.config to still be read and so > code should be added to loader to continue to parse it, or if loader.conf can > be considered the correct place and boot.config forgotten about? If the early boot messages are not displayed as Olivier

Re: UEFI, loader.efi and /boot.config

Hi! > With a recent change I made for UEFI, we now install loader.efi onto the ESP > and don???t run boot1. That means that /boot.config is no longer read, and so > console settings need to be put in /boot/loader.conf Which change is that ? > I was wondering if people will expect /boot.config

Re: openssl 1.1.1 utils mkerr.pl

Hi! > Did you try to use the openssl port? cd security/openssl111 $ grep mkerr pkg-plist $ does not have it, either. -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 One year to go ! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: kernel config question

Hi! > FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r331659: Thu Mar 29 12:31:36 EDT 2018 amd64 > > to CURRENT (as of last midnight. > Does this, in src/UPDATING: > > [8] In order to have a kernel that can run the 4.x binaries > needed to do an installworld, you must include the >

Re: pkg problem on FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT

Hi! > On 10/25/18 5:19 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > pkg-static install -f pkg > > It works better now, but there are some complaints. If it's only the certificate issue, try this: cd /usr/local/etc cp pkg.conf.sample pkg.conf vi pkg.conf - PKG_ENV : { SSL_NO_VERIFY_PEER: 1 }

Re: pkg problem on FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT

Hi! > FreeBSD konjak 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r339705 GENERIC  amd64 > > pkg-static install -f pkg > pkg-static: Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected.  Running > "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > pkg-static: Repository FreeBSD

Re: problems on lists.freebsd.org error 503 backend fetch failed

Hi! > Hi, if there's a better place to report this then please advise cluster...@freebsd.org or postmas...@freebsd.org -- they are informed about it already. > It seems the web-mail-list software for FreeBSD has failed partially (mostly?) It's the load-balancer in front of the mailman instance

Re: Bad DHCP Checksums over VLANs

Hi! > >> ifconfig igb0 -rxcsum -txcsum -wol -tso4 -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag > >> -vlanhwcsum -vlanhwtso > >> > >> Try to disable everything that can be disabled, e.g. LRO etc. > > > > Disabling vlanhwtag works around the problem. > > > > Also note that only DHCP traffic has this problem. If I assign

Re: Bad DHCP Checksums over VLANs

Hi! > The server NIC is common (I211), so maybe it's easy to reproduce. I'll > help as much as I can, of course. Can you disable all the options of the NIC ? ifconfig igb0 -rxcsum -txcsum -wol -tso4 -vlanmtu -vlanhwtag -vlanhwcsum -vlanhwtso Try to disable everything that can be disabled,

Re: github freebsd and svn freebsd

Hi! > What's the difference between github freebsd and svn freebsd, other than > one is on github and the other is on svn? The github repo isn't official, because there are still some consistency issues. The consistency problem is: If an repo-copy from svn to git is done, how can that repo-copy

Re: NFS via IPv6 between 11.2-REL amd64 and larger (>45 files) directories?

Hi! > As Rick told me there's a ongoing debate on this, here's a copy > from my mail to stable@: PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231050 -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 2 years to go ! ___

Re: NFS via IPv6 between 11.2-REL amd64 and larger (>45 files) directories?

Hi! As Rick told me there's a ongoing debate on this, here's a copy from my mail to stable@: I've seen a strange effect: NFS via IPv6 between 11.2-REL amd64 boxes failed for directories with more than 45 files or directories. Small directories worked. It seems to be an issue with ipv6

Re: Unexpected results with 'mergemaster -Ui'

Hi! > line 133 onwards, for example. > > I never before found any potential change to > /etc/group > > Please, is it unusual? No, it is normal, that happens if you have local changes. I suggest you discard the incoming /etc/group and go with your current version

Re: updates to HEAD online, RSS non-browser ??

Hi! > secnetix.de used to let me read HEAD updates to src daily. > About > several monhts ago, my browsers cannot reach it and the 2ndry site > is tedious to read in an equivalent manner. AFAIK the site is still up. I've checked (from .de) and the site is down. Why don't you use the mailman

Re: em0 link fail

Hi! > On June 1st, I was able to do my monthly laptop ZFS snap-shot/back-up > (using "zfs snapshot -r zroot@backup; zfs send -R >nfs-filesys"). Now I > can't without the em0 interface stalling :-( I had a similar case on a current r334918 and saw this in the kern syslog: Jun 30 15:40:34 fc

Re: swapping is completely broken in -CURRENT r334649?

Hi! > > I just started it again, and after a while the qemu-ppc64-static > > was at approx. 23 GB memory and increasing, without much progress. > Last time I tried (2 weeks ago) qemu-ppc64-static was broken, not sure the > situation has evolved since that. Ok, thanks! Then it's not the same

Re: swapping is completely broken in -CURRENT r334649?

Hi! > > > The change was committed as r334752. Are you seeing unexpected OOM > > > kills on or after that revision? > > > > When I tried to run a qemu-based poudriere run yesterday on a r334918 > > box, it killed a few processes outside of that run and did not > > work out. > > > > I'm unsure

Re: swapping is completely broken in -CURRENT r334649?

Hi! > The change was committed as r334752. Are you seeing unexpected OOM > kills on or after that revision? When I tried to run a qemu-based poudriere run yesterday on a r334918 box, it killed a few processes outside of that run and did not work out. I'm unsure it was because of that problem

What's in FreeBSD12

Hi! > As OpenBSD fan, who also uses OpenBSD on EdgerouterLite, > I would be pleased to hear that FreeBSD-12 would be a release where PF > is updated to some newer version, possibly having parity with OpenBSD. > > In the meantime it looks like I will need to learn IPFW to do QoS. > > BTW: I was

Re: pfctl: igb0: driver does not support altq

Hi! > I get a message: > pfctl: igb0: driver does not support altq > > on: > 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #1 r88: > Wed May 9 00:58:52 CEST 2018 > root@***censored***:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GUSTIK > amd64 [...] > Problem does not seem to appear on

Re: AES67

Hi! > Is there any known attempt to implement AES67 (is an open standard > for audio over IP and audio over ethernet interoperability) on FreeBSD? > http://medianetworkingalliance.com/faq-aes67/ I found

Re: netmap with ix/igb?

Hi! > I'm having problems* using netmap with 12-CURRENT from late 2017. Anyone > know if a newer kernel would work better? Something like this ? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221317 Look in bugs.freebsd.org for ixgbe, there are several other issues. -- p...@opsec.eu

  1   2   3   >