Re: I got a panic for "nvme0: cpl does not map to outstanding cmd" on a MACHIATObin Double Shot

2021-05-23 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-23, at 00:08, Mark Millard via freebsd-current wrote: > On 2021-May-22, at 22:16, Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 10:44 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-arm >> wrote: >> # mount -onoatime 192.168.1.187:/usr/ports/ /mnt/ >> # diff -r /us

Re: I got a panic for "nvme0: cpl does not map to outstanding cmd" on a MACHIATObin Double Shot

2021-05-23 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-22, at 22:16, Warner Losh wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 10:44 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-arm > wrote: > # mount -onoatime 192.168.1.187:/usr/ports/ /mnt/ > # diff -r /usr/ports/ /mnt/ | more > nvme0: cpl does not map to outstanding cmd > cdw0: sqhd:

I got a panic for "nvme0: cpl does not map to outstanding cmd" on a MACHIATObin Double Shot

2021-05-22 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-arm
0-CURRENT #1 main-n246854-03b0505b8fe8-dirty: Sat May 22 16:25:04 PDT 2021 root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-dbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-DBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400013 1400013 === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)

FYI: Example USB3 boot failure on RPi4B ZFS-on-root system booting main: uhub_reattach_port notices involved

2021-05-22 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-arm
media present. Port 3 apparently had the USB3 SSD boot media (the same media that the FreeBSD loader got the kernel from before the above). Cutting power and starting over did not get the problem again (so far). === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)

Re: FYI for aarch64 main [14] running a mid March version: I ended up with [usb{usbus2}] stuck at (near) 100% cpu

2021-05-14 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system thread `bufdaemon' to stop... done Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system thread `bufspacedaemon-1' to stop... done Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system thread `bufspacedaemon-3' to stop... done Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system thread `bufspacedaemon-4' to stop... done Wai

Re: FYI for aarch64 main [14] running a mid March version: I ended up with [usb{usbus2}] stuck at (near) 100% cpu

2021-05-14 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
n to completion. >> >> When I retried after rebooting and scrubbing (no >> problems found), the problem did not repeat. >> >> I do not have more information nor a way to repeat >> the problem on demand, unfortunately. >> >> Details of the vintage of the

FYI for aarch64 main [14] running a mid March version: I ended up with [usb{usbus2}] stuck at (near) 100% cpu

2021-05-14 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
shot for mm's patched build in git context. merge-base: 7381bbee29df959e88ec59866cf2878263e7f3b2 merge-base: CommitDate: 2021-03-12 20:29:42 + 7381bbee29df (freebsd/main, freebsd/HEAD, pure-src, main) cam: Run all XPT_ASYNC ccbs in a dedicated thread n245444 (--first-parent --count for merge-base) The s

Re: zpool list -p 's FREE vs. zfs list -p's AVAIL ? FREE-AVAIL == 6_675_374_080 (199G zroot pool)

2021-05-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-5, at 17:01, Yuri Pankov wrote: > Mark Millard via freebsd-current wrote: >> Context: >> >> # gpart show -pl da0 >> => 40 468862048da0 GPT (224G) >> 40 532480 da0p1 efiboot0 (260M) >> 532520 2

zpool list -p 's FREE vs. zfs list -p's AVAIL ? FREE-AVAIL == 6_675_374_080 (199G zroot pool)

2021-05-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
19:52:14 2021 config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 da0p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in e

Re: ZFS rename with associated snapshot present: odd error message

2021-05-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-5, at 05:28, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-5, at 02:47, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> On 05/05/2021 01:59, Mark Millard via freebsd-current wrote: >>> I had a: >>> # zfs list -tall >>> NAME USED AVAIL

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files? [aarch64 test did not reproduce the issue]

2021-05-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-4, at 20:26, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-4, at 13:38, Mark Millard wrote: > >> [The first buidlworld is still in process. So while waiting . . .] >> >> On 2021-May-4, at 10:31, Mark Millard wrote: >> >>> I probably know why

Re: ZFS rename with associated snapshot present: odd error message

2021-05-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-5, at 02:47, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 05/05/2021 01:59, Mark Millard via freebsd-current wrote: >> I had a: >> # zfs list -tall >> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT >> . . . >> zroot/DESTDIRs/13_0R-CA72

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files? [aarch64 test did not reproduce the issue]

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-4, at 13:38, Mark Millard wrote: > [The first buidlworld is still in process. So while waiting . . .] > > On 2021-May-4, at 10:31, Mark Millard wrote: > >> I probably know why the huge count of differences this time >> unlike the original report . . . &

ZFS rename with associated snapshot present: odd error message

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
name -apKU FreeBSD CA72_4c8G_ZFS 13.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE #0 releng/13.0-n244733-ea31abc261ff-dirty: Thu Apr 29 21:53:20 PDT 2021 root@CA72_4c8G_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/13_0R-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/13_0R-src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1300139 1300139 === Mark Milla

Re: should bsdinstall work?

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
gt; worth submitting a PR? or is bsdinstall legacy and I need to use some > other method. I've not tried releng/12.2 yet. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list htt

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files? [Ignore recent test: -dirty vs. checked-in usage difference]

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
[The first buidlworld is still in process. So while waiting . . .] On 2021-May-4, at 10:31, Mark Millard wrote: > I probably know why the huge count of differences this time > unlike the original report . . . > > Previously I built based on a checked-in branch as part of > m

diffoscope's odd UnicodeDecodeError error message: reason found

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
ad return loads(fp.read(), File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/codecs.py", line 504, in read newchars, decodedbytes = self.decode(data, self.errors) UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xb7 in position 18: invalid start byte Not exactly an obvious error message for the issue. ===

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files? [Ignore recent test: -dirty vs. checked-in usage difference]

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-uns

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
[Just adding readelf -S info since it seems to show more.] On 2021-May-4, at 10:01, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-4, at 08:51, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2021-May-4, at 06:01, Ed Maste wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 22:26, Mark Millard wrote: >>

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-4, at 08:51, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-4, at 06:01, Ed Maste wrote: > >> On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 22:26, Mark Millard wrote: >>> >>> But I'll note that I've built and stalled py37-diffoscope >>> (new to me). A basic quick

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-4, at 06:01, Ed Maste wrote: > On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 22:26, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> But I'll note that I've built and stalled py37-diffoscope >> (new to me). A basic quick test showed that it reports: >> >> W: diffoscope.main: Fuzzy-matching i

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-3, at 21:27, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-3, at 19:26, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2021-May-3, at 10:51, Mark Millard wrote: >> >>> On 2021-May-3, at 07:47, Ed Maste wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 02:

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-03 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-3, at 19:26, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-3, at 10:51, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2021-May-3, at 07:47, Ed Maste wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 02:50, Mark Millard via freebsd-current >>> wrote: >>>> >>

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-03 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-3, at 10:51, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-3, at 07:47, Ed Maste wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 02:50, Mark Millard via freebsd-current >> wrote: >>> >>> Files /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/13_0R-CA7-chroot/sbin/ping and >>> /usr

Re: FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-05-03 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-May-3, at 07:47, Ed Maste wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 02:50, Mark Millard via freebsd-current > wrote: >> >> Files /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/13_0R-CA7-chroot/sbin/ping and >> /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/13_0R-CA7-poud/sbin/ping differ >> Files /usr/obj/DESTDI

Re: Build fail updating from n246398-388c0cde1029 -> n246413-c78ad207baed

2021-05-01 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
printf("\n%23s %012jx %012jx %08jx ", type, + (uintmax_t)map->md_phys, (uintmax_t)map->md_virt, (uintmax_t)map->md_pages); if (map->md_attr & EFI_MD_ATTR_UC) printf("UC "); === Mark Mi

Re: ZFS going forward, on stable/13 vs. main: question

2021-04-30 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
[Just a resend: asking the question on the list less than an hour before the UTC month change might not be all that effective relative to those that just web browse the list to read it.] On 2021-Apr-30, at 16:21, Mark Millard wrote: > Context . . . > > I've been experimenting

ZFS going forward, on stable/13 vs. main: question

2021-04-30 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
ZFS versioning is independent between 13 and 14. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any m

FYI: WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= problem for some files?

2021-04-29 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
are about such differences. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "

Re: (D29934) Reorder commented steps in UPDATING following sequential order. (was: etcupdate -p vs. root on zfs (and bectl use and such): no /usr/src/etc/master.passwd (for example))

2021-04-25 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Apr-25, at 08:14, Graham Perrin wrote: > On 23/04/2021 08:39, Mark Millard via freebsd-current wrote: > >> [3] > > > With regard to mounting ZFS file systems in single user mode > > What's currently footnote 3 will probabl

Despite the documentation, "etcupdate extract" handles -D destdir (and its contribution to the default workdir)

2021-04-24 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
j/DESTDIRs/13_0R-CA7-for-chroot/var/db/etcupdate/ I have not checked on if "etcupdate build" has a similar issue vs. not. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing

https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/stable-13/?C=M=D messed up dates and HASHID-only use make things extremely hard to find "in time order"

2021-04-23 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
touched on the file server and would make time ordered finding of things (such as for build-less approximate bisecting) far more reasonable. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org

etcupdate -p vs. root on zfs (and bectl use and such): no /usr/src/etc/master.passwd (for example)

2021-04-23 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
ng / writable at this stage either.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any

13.0-RELEASE bsdinstall failure : looked for MANIFEST in wrong place (not with *.txz files)

2021-04-17 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
-- 1 root wheel 26552108 Apr 9 07:39:21 2021 kernel.txz # ls -Tla /usr/freebsd-dist/ ls: /usr/freebsd-dist/: No such file or directory NOTE: creating /usr/freebsd-dist/ with a copy of the MANIFEST file in it was enough to get past this issue: it is doing Archive Extraction now. === Mark Millard

Re: FYI: main (bad9fa56620e based): some unexpected SIGSEGV's using poudriere-devel to build armv7 ports on aarch64 (cortex-a72) system

2021-03-10 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Mar-10, at 10:09, Olivier Houchard wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 03:39:42PM -0800, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: >> After using poudriere to build ports for native cortex-a72 >> on the MACCHIATObin Double Shot (and similarly for >> cortex-a57 on

Re: FYI: main (bad9fa56620e based): some unexpected SIGSEGV's are tied to interrupted system calls for armv7 poudriere target (cortex-a53/a57/a72 fail, cortex-a7 works(?))

2021-03-09 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Mar-9, at 22:00, Mark Millard wrote: [Trying to be timely about reporting new information because of 13.0 not having much time left.] > On 2021-Mar-9, at 21:11, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2021-Mar-9, at 19:17, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> [My only testing c

Re: FYI: main (bad9fa56620e based): some unexpected SIGSEGV's are tied to interrupted system calls (cortex-a57/a72 fail, cortex-a53/cortex-a7 work)

2021-03-09 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Mar-9, at 21:11, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Mar-9, at 19:17, Mark Millard wrote: > > [My only testing context for this has been main, not 13.0. > But it might be a 13.0 worry.] > >> Using the quickest to so-far-reliably-fail type of example from >>

Re: FYI: main (bad9fa56620e based): some unexpected SIGSEGV's are tied to interrupted system calls (cortex-a57/a72 fail, cortex-a53/cortex-a7 work)

2021-03-09 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Mar-9, at 19:17, Mark Millard wrote: [My only testing context for this has been main, not 13.0. But it might be a 13.0 worry.] > Using the quickest to so-far-reliably-fail type of example from > another thread I used truss to see what happens, here filtered > down to two

FYI: main (bad9fa56620e based): some unexpected SIGSEGV's are tied to interrupted system calls while using poudriere-devel to build armv7 ports on aarch64

2021-03-09 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
- UNKNOWN FreeBSD32 SYSCALL 542 -- 83316 100123: #542(0xcd54,0x0) = 0 (0x0) -- UNKNOWN FreeBSD32 SYSCALL 2 -- 83842 100199: 83316 100123: #2() = 83842 (0x14782) -- UNKNOWN FreeBSD32 SYSCALL 6 -- -- UNKNOW

Re: FYI: main (bad9fa56620e based): some unexpected SIGSEGV's using poudriere-devel to build armv7 ports on aarch64 (cortex-a72) system

2021-03-09 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Mar-9, at 17:18, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Mar-9, at 15:39, Mark Millard wrote: > >> After using poudriere to build ports for native cortex-a72 >> on the MACCHIATObin Double Shot (and similarly for >> cortex-a57 on the OverDrive 1000) I attempted to d

Re: FYI: main (bad9fa56620e based): some unexpected SIGSEGV's using poudriere-devel to build armv7 ports on aarch64 (cortex-a72) system

2021-03-09 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Mar-9, at 15:39, Mark Millard wrote: > After using poudriere to build ports for native cortex-a72 > on the MACCHIATObin Double Shot (and similarly for > cortex-a57 on the OverDrive 1000) I attempted to do my > usual bulk build targeting cortex-a7 via poudriere-devel: >

FYI: main (bad9fa56620e based): some unexpected SIGSEGV's using poudriere-devel to build armv7 ports on aarch64 (cortex-a72) system

2021-03-09 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
fc GENERIC-NODBG arm armv7 145 145 The host system reports: # ~/fbsd-based-on-what-freebsd-main.sh merge-base: bad9fa56620eb82395c5ab66d300e91a0222dde2 merge-base: CommitDate: 2021-03-06 21:46:28 + e48a1c379bfc (HEAD -> mm-src) mm-src snapshot for mm's patched build in git context. bad9

Re: Waiting for bufdaemon

2021-03-07 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Mar-5, at 17:35, Mark Millard wrote: > Yasuhiro Kimura yasu at utahime.org wrote on > Fri Mar 5 23:34:59 UTC 2021 : > >> From: Konstantin Belousov >> Subject: Re: Waiting for bufdaemon >> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 22:43:58 +0200 >> >>> My b

Re: Waiting for bufdaemon

2021-03-06 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
natives [ACPI-fast(900) i8254(0) TSC-low(-100) dummy(-100)] failed to make a usable environment. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.

Re: Waiting for bufdaemon

2021-03-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
# sysctl -ad | wc 11153 57922 604736 # sysctl -a | wc 13080 29457 449667 So: not a trivial amount of material. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: "grep -rI ... /" vs. processing of /dev/ : should "--exclude-dir /dev" be required in order to avoid /dev/?

2021-02-17 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Feb-17, at 11:44, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 7:29 PM Kyle Evans wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 7:23 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-current >> wrote: >>> >>> I historically on occasion have done something like: >>>

Re: Is stand/kshim/bsd_kernel.h 's __FreeBSD_version supposed to track main's 13->14 change?

2021-02-17 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Feb-17, at 01:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 2/17/21 1:58 AM, Mark Millard via freebsd-current wrote: >> stand/kshim/bsd_kernel.h has its own define of __FreeBSD_version and >> seems to have last had it changed in the main branch as shown below. >> Is it as

Re: pkg vs uname troubles after upgrade to 14 (lld not rebuilt issue? (X_)LINKER_FREEBSD_VERSION still 13 based?)

2021-02-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Feb-16, at 15:37, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Feb-16, at 11:49, Brandon Bergren wrote: > >> It looks like there were recently some fixes to release.sh, that just got >> backported to 13. I wonder if the problem is the packages themselves being >>

"grep -rI ... /" vs. processing of /dev/ : should "--exclude-dir /dev" be required in order to avoid /dev/?

2021-02-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
shot for mm's patched build in git context. 3acea07c1873 (pure-src) Restore the augmented strlen commentary FreeBSD FBSDFHUGE 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT mm-src-n244686-c1845d00f818 GENERIC-NODBG amd64 amd64 144 1400004 === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in e

Is stand/kshim/bsd_kernel.h 's __FreeBSD_version supposed to track main's 13->14 change?

2021-02-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
n -#define__FreeBSD_version 110 +#define__FreeBSD_version 130 #include #include === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.o

Re: pkg vs uname troubles after upgrade to 14

2021-02-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
e.sh would have to contribute as a side effect of its prior use in some way for that sequence, if I understand right. > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, at 12:20 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >> There are other reports of a: >> >> pkg: Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected. Run

Re: pkg vs uname troubles after upgrade to 14

2021-02-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
ruary/120154.html Steve Kargl: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2021-February/120298.html https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2021-February/120314.html (The last for Steve K. is about how solved.) But I cannot not tell if there is a common cause or a common solution.

Re: New Optane AIC does not show up in FreeBSD until . . . ?

2021-02-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Feb-16, at 02:22, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > Am 16.02.2021 um 11:08 schrieb Mark Millard: >> On 2021-Feb-16, at 00:48, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: >>> Am 14.02.2021 um 02:36 schrieb Mark Millard via freebsd-current: >>>> On 2021-Feb-13, at 16:40, Warner Lo

Re: New Optane AIC does not show up in FreeBSD until . . . ?

2021-02-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Feb-16, at 00:48, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > Am 14.02.2021 um 02:36 schrieb Mark Millard via freebsd-current: >> On 2021-Feb-13, at 16:40, Warner Losh wrote: >> >>> Are you aware of gpart create? >>> >>> Warner >> From which I derive

Re: HEADSUP: math is broken with clang and optimization

2021-02-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
adwell, skylake, skylake-avx512, skx, cascadelake, cooperlake, cannonlake, icelake-client, icelake-server, tigerlake, knl, knm, k8, athlon64, athlon-fx, opteron, k8-sse3, athlon64-sse3, opteron-sse3, amdfam10, barcelona, btver1, btver2, bdver1, bdver2, bdver3, bdver4, znver1, znver2, x86-64 # cc -

Re: New Optane AIC does not show up in FreeBSD until . . . ?

2021-02-13 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Feb-13, at 17:38, Warner Losh wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021, 6:36 PM Mark Millard wrote: > > On 2021-Feb-13, at 16:40, Warner Losh wrote: > > > Are you aware of gpart create? > > > > Warner > > From which I derive that I had an implicit, incorrec

Re: New Optane AIC does not show up in FreeBSD until . . . ?

2021-02-13 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
. So I need to find such a drive another way, something I was not even trying to do. That answers my question. Thanks. Mark >> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021, 4:41 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-current >> wrote: >> I plugged in a new Optane and booted FreeBSD on the >> ThreadRipper 1

New Optane AIC does not show up in FreeBSD until . . . ?

2021-02-13 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
004 But this is not a new thing, more of a "still true" thing. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe,

Re: cgit: orientation

2021-02-10 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
ight when what was being looked at was from stable/12 after it was branched (or some other such mis-matched example) and that he was indicating that the mismatches are misleading, especially if one does not know to expect them. Part of the issue is that nothing else on the commit page indica

Re: cgit: orientation

2021-02-10 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
ith the one that has "?h=stable/12&" shows stable/12 in the upper right and copy/ptase of the commit link show does include "?h=stable/12&" text. Further activity from there continues to have the text. Of course if one does a range search for the id, the context is lost.

FYI for main (14: 847dfd2803f6 based) on arm64 (cortex-a72): 2 odd g_vfs_done failures happened

2021-02-08 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
eBSD 14.0-CURRENT mm-src-n244686-c1845d00f818 GENERIC-NODBG arm64 aarch64 144 144 and had no troubles doing so. The other systems will all be updated to be based on the 3acea07c1873 source code vintage. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early

gcc bootstrap or such outdated references in src.conf and make.conf for 13 and 14

2021-01-30 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
c88 GENERIC-NODBG amd64 amd64 143 143 === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send

Re: FreeBSD-provided .vhd with VirtualBox: gpart I/O errors after resizing the virtual hard disk

2021-01-26 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
volved might avoid later getting cylinder checksum failure notices. I hope this proves of some help, but, if it is not, I'm unlikely to have more information, sorry. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___

Re: FYI: Why META_MODE rebuilds so much for building again after installworld (no source changes)

2021-01-26 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Jan-23, at 21:37, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Jan-22, at 01:45, Mark Millard wrote: > >> Given an already built, installed and booted system version, I've >> noted a big difference for META_MODE in 2 rebuild contexts (no >> source updates involved): &g

Re: fsck strange output

2021-01-26 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
to be the same type of "UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY" issue on an old 2-socket/2-cores-each PowerMac G5 powerpc64 configuration that was running main from after 5cc52631b3b8 . So, in this case, I do not expect that the problem is special to Ryzen or related CPUs. === Mark Millard m

Re: problem building virtualbox-ose-kmod

2021-01-26 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
if there was a problem about a month ago, there may be another problem as well as the above that was something else, the above just happens first now.) Looks like emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod needs to track the kernel change(s). === Mark Millard marklmi at

Re: pkg for 14-current

2021-01-25 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
names like main-armv7 , main-armv6 , main-mips , or main-mip64 . So I assume that those are not being experimented with yet. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Getting /usr/src to match specific git hash?

2021-01-24 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
On 2021-Jan-24, at 23:37, Mark Millard wrote: > >> How cat one track multiple branches with git without keeping entirely >> separate trees? > > There are multiple possibilities here and it is not > clear which you are hoping for. > > A) You could be trying to

Re: Getting /usr/src to match specific git hash?

2021-01-24 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-current
== 2756 total to also have a separate one for stable/13 in, say, /usr/fbsd/stable-13-shallow/ . === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailma

Re: Getting /usr/src to match specific git hash? (just about out of swap space messages and tuning)

2021-01-24 Thread Mark Millard
to wait for free pages before retrying the page fault handler # sysctl -d vm.pfault_oom_attempts vm.pfault_oom_attempts: Number of page allocation attempts in page fault handler before it triggers OOM handling I hope that helps. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( d

Re: FYI: Why META_MODE rebuilds so much for building again after installworld (no source changes)

2021-01-24 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-22, at 01:45, Mark Millard wrote: > Given an already built, installed and booted system version, I've > noted a big difference for META_MODE in 2 rebuild contexts (no > source updates involved): > > *) Prior buildworld buildkernel, installkernel, installworld, bo

FYI: Why META_MODE rebuilds so much for building again after installworld (no source changes)

2021-01-22 Thread Mark Millard
need to contribute to what needs to be rebuilt (just based on being newer). So the option to ignore (some of?) them could be useful in making META_MODE builds quicker. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar

Re: git: a9fc14fbf445 - main - newvers.sh: add support for gitup(1) [the removal of git branch information]

2021-01-21 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-21, at 09:24, Mark Millard wrote: > Ulrich Spörlein uqs at FreeBSD.org wrote on > Wed Jan 20 09:49:49 UTC 2021 : > >>While here, drop the redundant branch name from the git output and don't >>count commits in shallow clones. >> > >

Re: Silent hang in buildworld, was Re: Invoking -v for clang during buildworld

2021-01-21 Thread Mark Millard
t to use more like <=1800 MiByte to avoid what the documentation warns about for tradeoffs for having too much swap space. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://l

Re: Silent hang in buildworld, was Re: Invoking -v for clang during buildworld

2021-01-20 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-19, at 17:42, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Jan-18, at 21:12, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2021-Jan-18, at 19:19, Mark Millard wrote: >> >>> . . . >>>> FYI: I re-established my access to a RPi2B V1.1 and made >>>> i

Re: Silent hang in buildworld, was Re: Invoking -v for clang during buildworld

2021-01-19 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-18, at 21:12, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Jan-18, at 19:19, Mark Millard wrote: > >> . . . >>> FYI: I re-established my access to a RPi2B V1.1 and made >>> it report: "maximum recommended amount (468832 pages)" >>> >

Re: Silent hang in buildworld, was Re: Invoking -v for clang during buildworld

2021-01-19 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-18, at 19:19, Mark Millard wrote: > . . . >> FYI: I re-established my access to a RPi2B V1.1 and made >> it report: "maximum recommended amount (468832 pages)" >> >> (The figure can vary some from release to release.) >> >> 468832

Re: Silent hang in buildworld, was Re: Invoking -v for clang during buildworld

2021-01-18 Thread Mark Millard
) arm64: fix early devmap assertion FreeBSD OPiP2E_RPi2v11 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT mm-src-c255938-g4180404713ec GENERIC-NODBG arm armv7 1300135 1300135 This suggests that you should be able to build on the RPi2B v1.1, using -j4, with appropriate configuration for what and how to build. It is

Re: Silent hang in buildworld, was Re: Invoking -v for clang during buildworld

2021-01-18 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-17, at 19:19, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Jan-17, at 17:50, bob prohaska wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:30:51PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2021-Jan-17, at 09:40, bob prohaska wrote: >>> >>>>

Re: Silent hang in buildworld, was Re: Invoking -v for clang during buildworld

2021-01-17 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-17, at 17:50, bob prohaska wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:30:51PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> >> On 2021-Jan-17, at 09:40, bob prohaska wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 03:04:04PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >>>>

Re: Silent hang in buildworld, was Re: Invoking -v for clang during buildworld

2021-01-17 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-17, at 09:40, bob prohaska wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 03:04:04PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> Other than -j1 style builds (or equivalent), one pretty much >> always needs to go looking around for a non-panic failure. It >> is uncommon for all

Re: boot loader blank screen

2021-01-16 Thread Mark Millard
reen mode for VT VGA backend is graphics (unless we are running on hypervisor or hw.vga.textmode is set to 1). Using hw.vga.textmode for loader does remove possibility to have graphical mode VT VGA with text mode loader. screen.textmode can have possible values "0" to disable te

Re: boot loader blank screen

2021-01-16 Thread Mark Millard
ics (unless we are running on hypervisor or hw.vga.textmode is set to 1). Using hw.vga.textmode for loader does remove possibility to have graphical mode VT VGA with text mode loader. screen.textmode can have possible values "0" to disable text mode, and "1"

Re: Invoking -v for clang during buildworld

2021-01-16 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-16, at 14:03, bob prohaska wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:17:52AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> >> On 2021-Jan-16, at 07:55, bob prohaska wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:25:00PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >>>&

Re: Invoking -v for clang during buildworld

2021-01-16 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-16, at 07:55, bob prohaska wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:25:00PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> On 2021-Jan-15, at 20:37, bob prohaska wrote: >> >>> While playing with -current on armv7 using a raspberry pi 2 v1.1 >>> an e

Re: Invoking -v for clang during buildworld

2021-01-16 Thread Mark Millard
sole. > > In past occurrences, an old kernel (pre-git) worked through the problem. > If a restart of make buildworld doesn't get past the stoppage I'll check > again. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)

Re: WARNING: Device "kbd" is Giant locked and may be deleted before FreeBSD 13.0.

2021-01-15 Thread Mark Millard
BSD 13.0. powerpc (old PowerMac G4): WARNING: Device "agp" is Giant locked and may be deleted before FreeBSD 13.0. WARNING: Device "consolectl" is Giant locked and may be deleted before FreeBSD 13.0. Note: FreeBSD has boot problems for various powerpc64 and 32-bit powerpc Po

Re: Waiting for bufdaemon

2021-01-15 Thread Mark Millard
In the interest of documenting some variability . . . While not readily reproducible, on a ThreadRipper 1950X that I have access to, a recent reboot had one "system thread" time out: bufspacedaemon-3 . The rest of the "system thread" list behaved normally. === Mark Millard

Re: Old PowerMacs, Giant, and stable/13 branch and other futures: What is the intent?

2021-01-12 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-12, at 13:11, Mark Millard wrote: > PowerMac G5's and G4's with not much in them or connected to them report: > > WARNING: Device "openfirm" is Giant locked and may be deleted before FreeBSD > 13.0. > WARNING: Device "kbd" is Giant locked and

Old PowerMacs, Giant, and stable/13 branch and other futures: What is the intent?

2021-01-12 Thread Mark Millard
if this one is modal in some way and it I happen to be using a mode that avoided the usage. (I do not normally run an unpatched FreeBSD on old PowerMacs as well.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebs

Re: boot loader blank screen

2021-01-06 Thread Mark Millard
). This initial material displays in screen.textmode="1" style before the display switches to the screen.textmode="0" style of display for alter output. (I'm not complaining, just noting the visible sequence.) === Mark Millard marklmi at

Re: boot loader blank screen

2021-01-06 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-6, at 09:51, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <63a29589-22b5-495b-8e0d-14e13091d...@yahoo.com>, Mark Millard > write > s: >> >> >> On 2021-Jan-5, at 17:54, David Wolfskill wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan

Re: boot loader blank screen

2021-01-05 Thread Mark Millard
t; It's a medium-light blue, so it's easy enough to read (unlike a navy > blue, for example). FYI: whiteish on black (or at least something very dark) in my hw.vga.textmode="1" context. I saw everything here as well. I did not take videos to do detailed inspections. I did not notic

Re: boot loader blank screen

2021-01-05 Thread Mark Millard
>>> toomas >>> >> >> the 58661b3ba9eb should hopefully fix the loader text mode issue, it would >> be cool if you can verify:) >> >> thanks, >> toomas > > I think, I got it fixed (at least idwer did confirm for his system, thanks). >

Re: aarch64 based on main 58661b3ba9eb : panic for "ufs_dirbad: /: bad dir ino 66371814 at offset 106496: mangled entry"

2021-01-05 Thread Mark Millard
On 2021-Jan-5, at 13:28, Mark Murray wrote: >> On 5 Jan 2021, at 20:15, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> The machine is a MACCHIATOBin Double Shot. > > Thanks for the warning :-) > > I'm using an MBin/DS as my firewall/gateway, and in its Copious Free Time™, > an

aarch64 based on main 58661b3ba9eb : panic for "ufs_dirbad: /: bad dir ino 66371814 at offset 106496: mangled entry"

2021-01-05 Thread Mark Millard
r range of behavior for the cortex-a72 is involved here.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubsc

Re: CURRENT, usr/src on git, howto "mergemaster"?

2021-01-04 Thread Mark Millard
ed differences. Afterwards, the changes in the tree at /usr/src can be merged via a regular merge. END QUOTE I do not remember mergemaster having a bootstrap stage in setting it up, a stage that should be executed before /usr/src (or whatever) is updated. So the pro

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD src repo transitioning to git this weekend

2020-12-22 Thread Mark Millard
On 2020-Dec-22, at 13:31, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2020-Dec-22, at 13:06, bob prohaska wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 09:34:25PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote: >>> >>> what does "pkg install git" do for you? NB: I use "pkg install gi

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD src repo transitioning to git this weekend

2020-12-22 Thread Mark Millard
content. Checking out stable/12 from the clone should be possible after the above, but that is not what I've been doing. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD src repo transitioning to git this weekend

2020-12-22 Thread Mark Millard
status.freebsd.org/builds?type=package does not yet seem to include ampere2.nyi.freebsd.org based builds. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >