Re: Restart at boot with new kernel

> Is your kernel up to r337773 yet? That should have addressed the EFIRT > boot issue. > > Rebuilding now. Not sure how late I started so I might have missed it. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Restart at boot with new kernel

Ok missed the solution posted earlier: adding ' efi.rt.disabled=1' to loader.conf fixed the issue for me as well ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Restart at boot with new kernel

Hi list, just compiled current and after reboot into the new kernel the machine reboots itself at the marked line below. No further info as the reset is sudden. Reboot with the old kernel from 12 aug works. Removed all kernel modules but with no result. Any pointers how to approach this? Aug 14

Re: Mac OS X on bhyve

On 9 December 2016 at 09:54, A. Wilcox wrote: > > > And VirtualBox can boot Mac OS X without any bootloader or hacking, so > it is much more stable, and resilient to automatic updates (which you > need much experience to disable on newer releases, including macOS Sierra).

Re: Mac OS X on bhyve (was: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary)

On 9 December 2016 at 04:16, A. Wilcox wrote: > > Depending on version and edition of Mac OS X, this may or may not be a > legal suggestion; Apple has made various terms in their license that you > can only virtualise Mac OS X on Apple-branded hardware. (Some creative >

Re: OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL (OpenBSD)

Isn't the latest news that Googleco and the linux foundation setup a construction that these vital opensource projects get the proper funding. Meaning more man power and hopefully less bugs ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL (OpenBSD)

Not per se more but with money it can become someones full-time job. No sure about LibreSSL. Wouldn't it be easier and keeping in mind that money and resources are scares in the BSD camps to use the, hopefully, heavily funded openSSL? On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Zack Gold z...@linux.com

Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

There are a few alternatives to Lightroom available in Ports Collection, you might want to give them a try one day. offtopic: But it does not even come close to Lightroom. Gimp is also not even close to Photoshop. Maybe Pixelmator. But Gimp? The UI and usability is such a mess. But again it's

Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

Since when is GIMP an alternative to Lightroom? I was talking about raw processors, not raster image manipulators. The opensource alternatives to Lightroom come not close to the original. The _same_ is true for GIMP which is hardly workable and is not more then a nice showcase but its

Re: libinit idea

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Bruno Lauzé brunola...@msn.com wrote: It's really good to read the comments and see people point of view on this topic. I totally agree RC system is really good and stable, easy and extensible. The main concern I have here is performance. Starting a system is

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

Hi, tried 10-8 iso in Virtualbox but after reboot I was looking at a bootloader with a nice '-' but nothing more. post setup 'gpart list' showed no entries at all. On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Allan Jude free...@allanjude.com wrote: On 2013-10-07 15:59, Allan Jude wrote: Devin Teske

Re: [HEADS UP] pkgng binary packages regression in 1.0.9. Fixed in 1.0.9_1

Due to the security incident, there are still no official FreeBSD packages. Do you know what the status is on that issue? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send

Re: ZFS v28 is ready for wider testing.

I got this compile error agains todays current patched with patch -p0 -E /usr/src9/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c: In function 'zfs_ioc_recv': /usr/src9/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c:3586: error: too