[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have played with the statistics collection in GEOM a bit, and need
more feedback, but first: try to play with it a bit.
Assuming you're running -current as of today, otherwise install
include files and libgeom by hand first.
Apply this patch in src/sys/geom and make a
Terry, FreeBSD has no support for BGP. To get BGP support you install a
router daemon. That inserts routes in the routing table in the kernel. The
kernel will do all packet forwarding. The kernel has to support two or
more routes to the same destination if you are going to do BGP (or OSPF)
equ
> This is on a recently-built -current box. When I try to move ftp from
> port 21 to port 2121 in /etc/services, I get a "Connection
> refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites. Should ftp
> be this dependent on /etc/services? What if you _have_ no services
> running, e.g. ine
> Ok, I checked, and vmstat shows cpu usage to be quite normal, about 6%
> while playing. What's up w/ top?
Not on my computer:
pantzer@skalman ~ >vmstat -w 1
procs memory pagedisks faults cpu
r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr ad0 da0 in sy
> Patrick Mau wrote:
>
> > On all Unix-like systems I know, the load average is the average mumber
> > of processes running during a given time interval. I can't see what use
> > it may have to count load for _waiting_ processes.
> >
> > I/O load is not process load, if a process waits for I/O c
> > If I put INET6 in my kernelconfig my network stops working. Even IPv4. I have
> > a Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B Ethernet (fxp) card. I found a fix for
> > FreeBSD on an OpenBSD mailinglist :-)
> >
> > http://www.sigmasoft.com/~openbsd/archive/openbsd-tech/199912/msg00321.html
> >
> > So
If I put INET6 in my kernelconfig my network stops working. Even IPv4. I have
a Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B Ethernet (fxp) card. I found a fix for
FreeBSD on an OpenBSD mailinglist :-)
http://www.sigmasoft.com/~openbsd/archive/openbsd-tech/199912/msg00321.html
Something better than that is
> :That has nothing to do with it. Not for cpu usage. If you have two users
> that> :are using all the CPU they can they ought to get 50% of the CPU each.
> Even if> :one of the users have 1 process and the other have 100 processes.
> :
> :Sun has a product for this, Solaris Resource Manager.
>
>
> :
> :It should be possible to prevent a user from hogging a system if the system's
> :naive scheduler is improved.
> :
> : Amancio
>
> No, it isn't. For a very simple reason: The resources users need to do
> real work are very similar to the resources users need to hog the syste
> > No. installworld more or less assumes single user.
>
> This is really what I'm getting at. :-)
>
> If installworld assumes single-user mode, why do we install -C
> ld-elf.so.1 ? The first time I asked this question, I didn't mention
> single-user mode and your answer was that it's to protect
10 matches
Mail list logo
