Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031130 11:36]: > > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > I have a better idea, then we perhaps need something like a wrapper > > script that is part of the FreeBSD basic system under /etc/rc.d that > > checks for the start script under $LOCALBASE/etc

Re: Turkeys and dynamic linking

2003-11-27 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031127 17:50]: > On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:31 pm, Bill Moran wrote: > > walt wrote: > > > To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one! > > > > > > And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the > > > performan

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-26 Thread Michael Edenfield
* M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031126 14:51]: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Michael Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : They were on a single CPU Athlon 500 with 320MB of RAM. > > 320MB is not enough RAM not to swap. > > Howev

Re: df: negative overflow?

2003-11-26 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Melvyn Sopacua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031126 13:23]: > /dev/ad0s2e ? 989M ? 947M -36.4M ? 104% ? ?/var This is normal. Each filesystem has a chunk of reserved space for root-only, for disaster recovery and such. Your /var filesystem is full, and has begun overflowing into that reserved space by

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-26 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031126 06:56]: > At 12:23 AM -0500 11/26/03, Michael Edenfield wrote: > > > >Just to provide some real-world numbers, here's what I got > >out of a buildworld: > > I have reformatted the numbers that Michae

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-26 Thread Michael Edenfield
* M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031126 00:43]: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Michael Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : * M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031125 12:07]: > : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-25 Thread Michael Edenfield
* M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031125 12:07]: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "boyd, rounin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : i see that there some doubt about whether running lots of > : shell scripts ever happens. what happens when you > : use make? lots of shells get run

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-25 Thread Michael Edenfield
* boyd, rounin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031125 05:16]: > i see that there some doubt about whether running lots of > shell scripts ever happens. what happens when you > use make? lots of shells get run and they run small > (one line?) scripts. Just to provide some real-world numbers, here's what I g

Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked

2003-11-24 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031124 14:11]: > I doubt there is any perfect answer which will satisfy > everyone, but perhaps we can recognize that and figure out > some flexible middle ground. Would it be possible, through some make.conf magic, for the end-user to set extra programs t

Re: Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything

2003-11-22 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Tim Kientzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031121 18:40]: > Leo Bicknell wrote: > >To boot a machine into single user mode you need a kernel, init, > >and /bin/sh (minimally). It would seem to me that alone is a good > >argument for those three things to be static. > * Rewrite dlopen() to not require d

Re: init and USB oddities-ULE-ATA

2003-11-17 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Harald Schmalzbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031116 23:42]: Content-Description: signed data > On Monday 17 November 2003 05:25, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 04:39:08AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > Content-Description: signed data > > > > > Salve, > > > > > > since about on

Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked

2003-11-17 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031116 23:21]: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 07:24:00PM -0700, Brent Jones wrote: > > This is just a case of OS evolution. /sbin used to be the place where > > the statically linked recovery things would be placed, in case the > > shared libraries got hosed. The

Re: General debug/kernel question

2003-11-16 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Harald Schmalzbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031116 20:43]: Content-Description: signed data > Salve, > > I always thought that building a kernel with debug symbols would increase the > kernel size dramatically. But if I understand things right the additioal > "symbols" (code snippets?) are not in

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-24 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Michael Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030924 13:21]: > * Ian Dowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030924 12:03]: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel > > Eischen writes: > > >On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote: > > >> PTHREAD_LIBS is

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-24 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Ian Dowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030924 12:03]: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel > Eischen writes: > >On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote: > >> PTHREAD_LIBS is a great tool for the /usr/ports mechanism, but doesn't > >> mean anything outside of that. > > > >That just meant it makes it ea

Re: Initial list of ports that fail due to -pthread

2003-09-24 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030924 01:50]: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:34:13AM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote: > > One very important group of ports that should get looked at when this > > gets worked out is KDE. Apparently, Qt uses a different means of > >

Re: Initial list of ports that fail due to -pthread

2003-09-23 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030923 22:21]: > Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect > PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I > just grepped for the "-pthread is deprecated" error message). None of One very important group of

Re: Shared object "libintl.so.4" not found

2003-09-13 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030913 00:26]: > > From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Please don't give bogus advice. The solution is to update everything > > that depends upon gettext, e.g. by using portupgrade. > > Maybe, but this bit me and the solution was to re-build gmake. T

Re: Quo vadis, -CURRENT? (recent changes to cc & compatibility)

2003-09-10 Thread Michael Edenfield
* David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030910 15:33]: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:41:41PM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote: > > gnome2 depends on gnomemedia2. > > gnomemedia2 depends on gstreamer-plugins. > > gstreamer-plugins fails because ARTSD_FLAGS in several dozen

Re: Quo vadis, -CURRENT? (recent changes to cc & compatibility)

2003-09-10 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030910 10:53]: > In 5-current we have 3 threads libraries and want to be able to install > and use them in parallel. So there has to be a way to specify which one. > This is why we need the ports collection to respect the PTHREAD* > variables. A lot of po

Re: re-fdisk'ing a partition - permission denied?

2003-09-09 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Ulrich Spoerlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030909 12:33]: > On Mon, 08.09.2003 at 18:10:38 -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote: > > e.g., if you have ad0s1a mounted as /, you cannot: > > > > * fdisk ad0 to create ad0s2 > > * disklabel ad0s2 to create ad0s2a > > * pe

Re: new MB = ACPI Errors?

2003-09-08 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Steve Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030908 20:26]: > > Hey. I installed a new motherboard today and now I get a lot of ACPI > errors (with a kernel from today and one from a few days back). This > anything to worry about? Not really, just annoying. A fair number (all that I've seen!) of motherboar

Re: re-fdisk'ing a partition - permission denied?

2003-09-08 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Jason Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030908 17:54]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > You have hit one of the main issues still to be resolved in GEOM. (I > > don't know that phk thinks it's a problem to be resolved or a feature to > > be documented.) > > > > In any case, si

Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin Makefile src/lib Makefile src/sbinMakefile src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.sbin Makefile

2003-08-30 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030830 09:18]: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > See /etc/defaults/make.conf > > Only in RELENG_4, last time I checked. In 5.x, since make.conf was not a set of defaults but merely a list of available make flags, it was moved

no more unkillable kse threads.

2003-06-26 Thread Michael Edenfield
Just an FYI: After doing a rebuild of my kernel/world over night I can no longer reproduce the unkillable 'ksetest' program problem. I didn't apply any of the signal handling patches or anything special, so I guess something was just flukey with my setup. Thanks! --Mike pgp0.pgp Descr

Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030624 19:01]: > As of last testing (yesterday my laptop (non SMP) acted the same.. > > I'm not sure what to suggest. > can you confirm that you are running the newest of everything.. > (though as far as I know it was ok, even several weeks ago). I'll re-cv

Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030624 14:47]: > > I had the same experience just running the KSE test application from > > /usr/src/tools last night. I ended up with three unkillable ksetest > > applications and ultimately rebooted to get rid of them. I was > > planning to report it a

Re: Unkillable processes with libKSE

2003-06-24 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030624 12:45]: > Thought I would give libKSE a try making use of the 'libmap.conf' library > translations. KDE loads fine, but when I tried to run Firebird I get a > process with 3 threads, and it is completely unkillable. It also is I had the same experience

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Michael Edenfield
* James Tanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030529 17:18]: > How does one go about using libthr? Is all that is > involved is symlinking libc_r to libthr? That's the easiest way. You can also explicitly link applications with -lthr instead of -lc_r. And since libthr and libc_r are both 6 characters lo

Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

2003-05-27 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030527 23:51]: > >I am thinking of ports like rtc, ltmdm or Vmware here.. where it is not > >uncommon that they require reinstalling after an upgrade. I have > >experienced kernel panics on several occasions from out of date vmware > >kernel modules. > > I'm real

Re: sendmail_enable="NONE" doesn't appear in rc.conf

2003-03-08 Thread Michael Edenfield
From: "Daniel Flickinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 11:48 AM > I have not checked recently, but 'make installworld' has > always trashed files: > > /usr/sbin/sendmail > /usr/bin/mailq > /usr/bin/newaliases > > which, in the default, are symbolic lin

Re: What's happened to CPUSTATES in /usr/include/devstat.h?

2003-03-02 Thread Michael Edenfield
From: "Paolo Pisati" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 2:24 PM > i noticed it while i was compiling kdebase-3, cause > ksysguard failed. > > Add > > #include > > to devstat.h to fix it. FWIW, I had the same problem (and used the same solution) with a few other X ports, particular