On 01/23/16 09:15, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Are you sure of this? I have not looked at the code, but my former
> colleagues at the high performance research network ESnet claim at
> http://fasterdata.es.net/data-transfer-tools/say-no-to-scp/ that the
> internal buffers and effective window size
On 11/10/15 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Some of you may have noticed that OpenSSH in base is lagging far behind
the upstream code.
The main reason for this is the burden of maintaining the HPN patches.
They are extensive, very intrusive, and touch parts of the OpenSSH code
that change
On 04/01/2014 07:46, dte...@freebsd.org wrote:
Eitan,
While I understand your frustration, VICOR is using FreeBSD as a Desktop since
FreeBSD 2.2. We don't use sound and we are fine relying on vesa.
While I understand that the things you listed are actual short-comings for
normal
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
I have an asr based RAID controller (Adaptec 2400A), though it is an IDE
RAID controller, it uses the SCSI asr driver. My controller has
worked very well with FreeBSD 5.x, and the server is currently running
5.1-BETA. The only thing that doesn't
