I've got an ongoing problem with apache. Sometimes in normal operation,
and always when sent a SIGHUP, the main httpd process will spin and
consume the cpu. GDB reveals that it's stuck somewhere in a thread
handling routine:
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x2862a31c in _thread_sig_h
> > This could be related to the entropy gathering by the random kthread. Have you
> > tried removing the random device from your kernel?
>
> yes, i've tried. no effect.
This seems to have fixed the problem for me, thanks! I'm using the
machine now and am getting no keyboard-related glitches in
> i have Ensoniq ES1371-based soundcard supported by pcm driver and
> experience some problems. the sound played is interruped by clicks and
> distorsions, and they appear more often when the disk activity is high.
> during playback the kernel generates messages like 'pcm0: hwptr went
> backwards
> > That can't be true, at least not for the IBM DeskStars I own, I've
> > NEVER EVER seen them do that, one proof should be:
>
> same here
>
> wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): , DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16
> wd0: 8063MB (16514064 sectors), 16383 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S
> wdc0: unit 1 (wd1): , DMA, 3
Apple's QuickTime 4 uses these protocols for streaming QuickTime, and I've
got users asking me if the FreeBSD NAT box can be made to handle it.
Looks like these protocols are new internet standards, has anyone
integrated them into libalias yet? If not I might give it a shot, but I'm
probably in ov
Last summer I encountered a P133 machine where linux detected the IDE
controller, but FreeBSD did not. I wrote it off as a fluke. I've now
come into possession of a stack of DECpc 433dxLP machines. These are
486/33 machines in a slimline desktop case. They have integrated IDE
controllers, and I
> Ok! So I'll stop passing on this information, I'll try it again. Last
> time I used ISC-dhclient, it did infact REQUIRE a configuration file.
> Now a zero length file might of done the trick.. but it bitched about a
> non-existent file. and would not fetch an IP address for me when I ran
> it.
> > That argument won't work with Media-One, Roadrunner, RCN, etc who
> > just simply *DO* *NOT* *SUPPORT* *STATIC* *IP* *ASSIGNMENTS*. How
> > can we make this any clearer to you? Its fine to say `I don't want
> > to see DHCP in the base system' when you have the choice of getting
> > a static IP.
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > > These should be left has ports.
> >
> > Explain how I am to install FreeBSD at my campus when DHCP has been
> > mandated. Many univ. are moving in this direction.
> >
>
> Maybe, support WC by purchasing the cd-rom?
>
> Convince your University to get a large quant
> > If we want FreeBSD to have any credibility as a workstation OS, we
> > need DHCP. It should be possible for a user or admin to smack in the
> > boot floppy, have it autoconfigure the selected network interface, and
> > perform an FTP installation.
>
> So, we'll import a pop server, apache, g77
> speaking about DHCP-things (clients and servers) I would like to
> hear from some 'export' on choosing a the 'right' dhcp-software
> for FreeBSD.
> I'm mostly interested in choosing the server part. In the past I
> deployed only the wide-dhcp server from the ports collection; but
> only because
> Hmm.. I don't believe this can be true however. I do not program but
> I do run current on my workstation, it's just plain interesting thing
> to do. Just my opinion.
If you're running -current, you should at least be able to apply kernel
patches...
- Mike
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo
> Btw, if this is a new device, it is unlikely that the ft driver will support
> it anyway, I don't think it ever came above the 80Mbyte tapes...
I have a 2.2.x machine with a 120M device. I believe someone on this list
stated that they had it working with a 250M device as well.
- Mike
To Uns
13 matches
Mail list logo
