Hello, I'm trying to compile the current tree for my octeon device and
get the following error:
cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions
-Wmiss
On 20/02/2013 13:00, freebsd-current-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
Gathering informations from many places - as it is with "WHICH
PROFESSIONAL COMPILER WORKS ON FREEBSD WITH PROFESSIONAL HIGH
PERFORMANCE MATH LIBS" is horrible and time consuming. try it on Google
with the tag "Linux" makes you happ
On 2012-09-05 09:34, freebsd-current-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all,
I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD
10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.7.1 against
clang 3.1 and clang 3.2.
Hey,
you've got a cool idea, but the implementation ain't
On 2012-02-06 08:40, Matt Thyer wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012 3:50 AM, "Radio młodych bandytów"
mailto:radiomlodychbandy...@o2.pl>> wrote:
>
> I wonder if I'm the only one thinking about a decentralised package
management
> First, a decentralised transport layer
I wonder if I'm the only one thinking about a decentralised package
management
First, a decentralised transport layer. Torrents are faster and more
reliable than servers.
Second, decentralised management when anybody can upload a port directly
into the system.
--
Twoje radio
_
On 2012-01-05 21:03, kab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:31:55 -0800
wrote:
> Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking
> on[1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva configuration 'in the way the
> developers or production'. This is by rule. However, i poo
Well, the post is OT, but I need some vent.
On 2011-12-19 18:34, dan...@digsys.bg wrote:
For example, few checkboxes with common sysctl tuning would be perfect,
> even if they would be marked as "Experimental", or not recommended.
By following this, we push FreeBSD into the Linux style of doi
