sh: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 02 Dec 2003 11:48, Sean McNeil wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've tried over several weeks to get ATAPICAM to work for me. I've
> > tried with and without acpi (compiled in or disabled via. boot). I've
> > tried turning on
I saw that message about rev.1.23 of ata_lowlevel.c. I had this problem
prior to that change.
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 05:12, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Sean McNeil wrote:
>
> > I've tried over several weeks to get ATAPICAM to work for me. I've
> >
Hello,
I've tried over several weeks to get ATAPICAM to work for me. I've
tried with and without acpi (compiled in or disabled via. boot). I've
tried turning on all debug. I've tried a few misc. thigs. All leave my
system hanging after the GEOM initialization without any indication of
debug ou
Yes, I use the following in make.conf:
WITH_LDAP=openldap2
WITH_OPENLDAP=yes
Great, I will give your patch a try. Thanks!
Sean
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 10:23, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:10:20AM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote:
> > This was with Heimdal from an instal
It only complained about libldap.so.2, so I would guess kerberos is
using the -rpath for the others?
Thanks,
Sean
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 05:25, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:37:08PM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I was having troub
Hello All,
I was having trouble with startup and kdc/kadmin5 failing. Turns out
that they were trying to access a shared library in /usr/local/lib
(libldap.so.2). Unfortunately, both were getting started before
ldconfig.
I added ldconfig to the REQUIRE: for kerberos and now all is well.
What s
Hi all,
I just sent email to obrien and I would like to encourage getting the
ports collection changed to link bash dynamically. Hopefully before 5.2
release.
It was the last frustrating problem I had with getting all the LDAP
stuff working on FreeBSD-current. bash was displaying:
I have no na
Perfect!! This is exactly the thing I need. I will investigate. Memory
is an option, but this project is pretty much done. Knowing how to do
the bktr approach is something worth the excercise.
More RAM won't teach me anything new ;-)
Sean
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 16:09, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
eal for me. This is for a customer of mine and they
are OK with loading the module early during boot when memory isn't
fragmented yet.
Just thinking "out text",
Sean
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 00:31, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Sean McNeil wrote:
> > Yes, thanks for the clarificatio
Yes, thanks for the clarification. I still am inclined to believe,
though, that the disk driver is what is fragmenting the physical memory
with disk cacheing. It is only a theory, but it sounded plausible.
Thanks again,
Sean
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 00:13, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Sean McN
Hi everyone,
I was wondering if there is a way to flush out pages in memory that
might not be required. I have a device driver that allocates 16 distict
buffers each 32K in size. This is done with a bus_dma call as they will
be accessed by a PCI device. The problem is that if I do a compile on
11 matches
Mail list logo
