Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-15 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
15.12.2011 17:36, Michael Larabel пишет: On 12/15/2011 07:25 AM, Stefan Esser wrote: Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel: No, the same hardware was used for each OS. In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was used. Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on

Re: Panic after upgrade 7.2 - 7.3

2010-06-02 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
02.06.2010 01:56, Bjoern A. Zeeb пишет: On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Hi. Just after upgrade from 7.2-p5 to 7.3-p1 I've got periodic panics on my router (after about a hour uptime). ... Any ideas? Are you using IPsec

Panic after upgrade 7.2 - 7.3

2010-06-01 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Hi. Just after upgrade from 7.2-p5 to 7.3-p1 I've got periodic panics on my router (after about a hour uptime). Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 2; apic id = 06 fault virtual address = 0xc fault code =

pthread_mutex_lock crashed

2003-11-01 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Hello! I've tested MICO port (CORBA implementation) both on -stable and -current. I use lang/gcc33 port for -stable. On -stable all goes right, but on -current one example crashed in pthread_mutex_lock(). Here is gdb back tracing: #0 0x280830c9 in _atomic_lock () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 #1

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-30 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Richard Nyberg wrote: Doug White wrote: yes, this is a change to -current. It is for your own safety. I think this change in current is for the worse. I don't see why I can't manage slices and partitions from my regular OS, but have to boot up a CD to do the job. It's not even safer; I am

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-29 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Doug White wrote: Missing operating system comes out of the DOS default bootblock, not the BIOS. Yes, I know. But I don't feel better then. Don't use chainloader with FreeBSD. Use 'kernel /boot/loader' instead. This is documented in the GRUB info doc. Again, I have set this exact system up with

problems with sysinstall

2003-10-28 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
The first one: when I install -current on disk where WinXP on first slice, sysinstall brakes WinXP boot complete. I got 'Missing operation system' everytime. Even I've tried 'fixboot' and reinstall WinXP. Helps only 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0 count=100' and reinstall WinXP on clean disk.

Re: Initial list of ports that fail due to -pthread

2003-09-24 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Kris Kennaway wrote: Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I [skipped] omniORB-4.0.2 PR/56862 is waiting for ports unfreezing. -- Sem. ___ [EMAIL

Re: -current brake ufs for -stable

2003-09-22 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Bruce Evans wrote: -current doesn't write extended attributes unless you enabled them. OK. I'm wrong. Really I don't understand a problem. Superblock was corrupted. I've fix it with fsck (from other sector). But I decided remake the FS and run newfs from -stable again. Now I write on it buth

-current brake ufs for -stable

2003-09-21 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Hello! I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there). I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I booted with -stable I've found the partition FS was broken. I think it's because of extended

Re: gcc 3.3.1

2003-07-12 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 06:08:57 +0400 Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't forget bump __FreeBSD_version. :) What for? Bumped __FreeBSD_cc_version is enough. The ports system use it. How can we check is gcc changed? !defined(OSVERSION) .if exists(/sbin/sysctl

gcc 3.3.1

2003-07-11 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Don't forget bump __FreeBSD_version. :) Sem. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

5.1 and nawk

2003-06-06 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Tonight I'v installed a devel/newfile. When it's build it run nawk. In that time my computer was a very slow reaction without disk operation. When I'v runned top command I'v seen: -- last pid: 38039; load averages: 1.58, 1.80, 1.73up 0+01:21:08 05:22:28 53 processes: 3 running, 50

Flushing CD-ROM?

2003-06-05 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Why 5.1 flush acd0 on shutdown? - syncing disk, buffers remaining... done Uptime ... acd0: timeout waiting for cmd=e7 s=01 e=04 acd0: flushing device failed The operating system has halted. - Well, it's cd-writer really, but there is no disk there any way.

slow console input

2003-06-05 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Hello! When I'v upgraded from 4.x to 5.x and I'v noticed more slow console input. Will it be so? Or can I faster it? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Re: ACPI

2003-02-23 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
That's saying the acpi.ko module was not built and installed. When you install your new kernel, use the Makefile target, instead of using cp, or it won't install the modules it builds. If you did this, then check your make.conf to see if you are specifically telling it to not build modules,

Re: ACPI

2003-02-23 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
MODULES_WITH_WORLD causes modules to be installed during installworld. But when you later do installkernel, it renames /boot/kernel to /boot/kernel.old, so all your modules end up there. Don't use MODULES_WITH_WORLD, or use ``make reinstallkernel'' which is safe for MODULES_WITH_WORLD

ACPI

2003-02-22 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
I'v cvsup'ed from 5.0-RELEASE to RELENG_5_0_0 last night and ACPI doesn't work now. When booting I'v got a message: ACPI autoload failed - no such file or directory. How to fix? Sem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the