, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Spil,
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:06:35AM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
S There seems to be quite a bit of overhaul on the firewall code, pf and
S ipfw have been moved to sys/netpfil? Can there be some regressions in
S there that I hit?
Yes, a regression is possible
Hi,
There seems to be quite a bit of overhaul on the firewall code, pf and
ipfw have been moved to sys/netpfil? Can there be some regressions in
there that I hit?
Just upgraded to r250404 but that does not help. Should I file a PR?
Kind regards,
Spil.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Spil Oss
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:52:05 +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
Hi all,
If I disable checksum offloading on the NIC I do the tcpdump on, then I
assume that the checksum-check will provide accurate results?
It certainly should.
With checksum disabled, I see that the checksum is incorrect
Hi YongHyeon,
Will post on freebsd-ipfw@ as well...
Does your engineering sample function normally with rxcsum/txcsum disabled?
Kind regards,
Spil.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:11 AM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:48:00PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
Hi
0xff00 broadcast 172.17.2.255
nd6 options=21PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:14 AM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:45:58PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
Hi
at 09:14:16PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
Hi all,
With checksum offloading enabled I cannot use my axe NIC (ASIX AX88772B).
ifconfig ue0 -txcsum -rxcsum
will make dhclient ue0 return
if I re-enable txcsum and rxcsum I get an immediate response from the
dhcp
server.
Tried to remove
Hi all,
With checksum offloading enabled I cannot use my axe NIC (ASIX AX88772B).
ifconfig ue0 -txcsum -rxcsum
will make dhclient ue0 return
if I re-enable txcsum and rxcsum I get an immediate response from the dhcp
server.
Tried to remove the csum features by commenting out
